Robert F. Kennedy Jr. says that DARPA is spraying dangerous “chemicals” into the sky.
(twitter.com)
🔴 RED DOT LASERS 🔴
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (125)
sorted by:
Great comments/questions.
Hard to believe? No.
Hard to prove? Thats different.
Its one thing to say it. But for proper research, you need to reference the evidence through direct links to the actual reports and statements.
Dont just mention the patents, reference them. Link them with good statements and more reseach how they could be used.
Link/post the public figures statements, so they can be analyzed further. The people can then be researched further for how it links. Bank records, payoffs, board member associations. Those in the know are involved and can be exposed.
Heavy metals need time-indexed to specific times, so can be cross-checked with flight logs. Compared to type of aircraft, and other specific info to identify the aircraft, which might be FOIA'ed for any strange modifications like chemical holding tanks, sprayer assemblies, relations to companies that do those things.
Lots of good research starts out with individual strings, which eventually expose a pattern, which can end up showing the tapestry.
I'm not aware of any of this having been done by anyone. Heavy metal in soils is real, but no one has linked it to anything substantial outside of conjecture.
I dont think mods would be objective to this type of research.
"Its one thing to say it. But for proper research, you need to reference the evidence through direct links to the actual reports and statements."
I'll stop you right there. I have zero interest in spending hours collating the hard data I have on this subject and presenting here when there's already enormous headwinds from the moderators. It's time I don't have for little to no reward.
"Heavy metals need time-indexed to specific times, so can be cross-checked with flight logs."
There have been several scientific teams that have performed before & after samplings of the water and surface areas (grass, trees, etc). There's no cross checking flight logs. These planes are nearly always unmarked and nearly always do not have transponders (or disabled transponders) despite the legal requirement.
There are many people out there that have done good, meticulous work on this subject.
The reason for my post is simply confusion. To be brutally candid, GAW is deluged by terrible posts that have not been validated, corroborated or properly sourced on a daily basis. But GeoEngineering and CT posts are verboten and have been for a very long time. That is to say nothing of the other extremely fringe, less-supported theories that frequently find their way onto this board.
Again, I have zero interest in burning the hours required to do posts on this subject that are up to my personal standard. My original post was simply about me being curious as to why this is a hot button issue. Doubly so when anecdotally, I'd say the majority of the community thinks there's a "there there".
While i cant say too much about your multiple responses, and i totally respect your opinion, you do inadvertantly support my case, bigly.
Regardless of the contentious state of the topic here, you never disagreed or refuted that you could, in fact, get the topic posted if you put effort into it, which you've also vehemently declined to do. Again, like others, you've stated there is proof but refuse to post any other than anecdotal.
Dont get me wrong. I agree with you, this and flat earth have gotten extra reactions from pedes and mods. I dont pretend to know exactly why either.
However, i know if someone does as I've suggested, that would be a quality post, and should not be taken down, and i would fight a mod if they did.
To be transparent, cloud seeding has long now been admitted to be real, as has been weather manipulation. To what degree, how, why, and how it has been abused by team evil has yet to be seen, or how it can be stopped.
But, as i said before, lots of quality posts have been here, but none of quality about this topic, at least that I've seen. I wish there had been, I'm very interested in the topic.
"you do inadvertantly support my case, bigly"
I certainly don't see how.
"this and flat earth have gotten extra reactions from pedes and mods"
The flat earthers deserve the extra reactions.
There is also the problem that if there were no chemtrails, there would still be contrails. They would still cross the sky. It is a "problem" whose harm is difficult to prove, whose existence is also difficult to prove, and whose absence is impossible to prove. One can hardly ask for a more perfect distraction to occupy time and attention.
Oh, and correct, quality posts have beenfewer as time has gone by. Then again, while we love research, we have had fun too:
https://greatawakening.win/p/12j0MXgwid/115-104-97-108-108-32-119-101-32/
https://greatawakening.win/p/11S0l2CyMF/we-will-become-the-news-after-th/c/
True the effort has gone down as people just depend on this site for news and think it just magically appears. I post 20 times a day. And I mean no disrespect to you, but, it's laughable watching you complain about the quality of posts here on GAW when your last post here was 63 days ago.
The problem is is that when contrails conditions are prevalent, all jets leave contrails equally. Is your argument that all jets are spraying, or only some jets are spring? Yes we have patents for spraying aerosols from airplanes. But how do we explain the absence of dedicated tanks in the airplanes? I know so many aircraft mechanics from my time working in the airlines. I have never once met someone that actually works in aircraft maintenance or operations that believes in chemtrails. They know that it is absolutely patiently ridiculous. Explain the mechanism. If there's no dedicated tanks and spraying, or injection into the engine, because we don't have those systems, then it must be in the fuel. Okay, well, as I reference above in a different comment, I worked in airline refueling after high school, we sample the jet fuel every time we refill in order to prove that we did not give them contaminated fuel. Nobody cared as long as I filed the vials. If I had taken a second vial of fuel a sample home in my jacket nobody would have cared. Because nobody cares because nothing's in the fuel.