Robert F. Kennedy Jr. says that DARPA is spraying dangerous “chemicals” into the sky.
(twitter.com)
🔴 RED DOT LASERS 🔴
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (125)
sorted by:
When people declare contrails to be chemtrails, the eyeball test is meaningless. There is nothing to compare. Depending on altitude and humidity conditions, there can be zero contrails, transient contrails, or persistent contrails. And only contrails.
Cloud seeding and airborne fire suppression are done at low altitude and do not resemble contrails. Patents are not evidence of implementation (I have nine, none implemented as patented, alas). When I worked at Boeing, I was a member of a research team that was looking into distance detection of wake vortices. The idea of chemical tracer injection was regarded as a complete non-starter.
It's worth investigating and merits discussion is all I'm saying. Everyone said that I needed a tinfoil hat for not getting the jab and now there's all sorts investigating and discussing. We stopped using leaded gasoline, dusting our children with DDT and prescribing cigarettes for a reason. I eat MSG without fear now because of investigation and discussion...
I refueled jet engines for a year solid straight immediately after high school. It would have been absolutely trivial for me to take a vial of jet fuel home. We tested samples and collected samples every time we refueled the plane In order to prevent the airlines from claiming that we gave them contaminated fuel. Where are the samples??
You would think their mechanics would have something to say. These are the conversations I want to hear. I'm not in aviation but I know engines and can tell when something ain't right with fuel. Then I hear about laws passed and companies openly admitting to geoengineering. I'm not on one side or the other. I'm with you, I'd be very interested to see some proof. There's enough ruckus over it to make me somewhat curious.
Contrails are not worth investigating when the investigation will turn up Zero. Other subjects have other circumstances. My rejection of the jab was founded on the fact that I caught them lying early in the game about the safety of hydroxychloroquine---and paying attention to those who were obtaining cures using it. Leaded gasoline was outlawed, but I cannot recall any clear evidence of public harm from it. It results in hardship with the need for high-octane fuel in airplane piston engines. (Now we just get to breathe organic poisons instead of metallic ones. Methyl-tert-butane, anyone?) DDT was unfairly condemned by a publicity campaign based on fudged information, and its banning led to the deaths of millions of children in the Third World. I don't know about monosodium glutamate, but do not recall any controversy in particular. And, of course, everyone is terrified of radioactivity and we've had nuclear power stupidly curtailed for half a century.
I am not opposed to caution, but there have been too many cases of things being banned or shunned or imposed based on propaganda campaigns by those with an axe to grind. The whole "green" movement is a case in point, where industry itself is throttled for the sake of a magical fear, unsupported by "the science."
But let them study to their hearts' content. Just be prepared for the conclusion to be "nothing here," and live with it. Here's a pretty decent debunking website that provides a lot of education: https://skepticproject.com/articles/chemtrails/.
I'm going to check this out.