How about cracking down on the foreign intelligence agencies behind these turds?

2 birds 1 stone.

Let's get REAL now...

u/#popcornmonster

https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/2026-USCT-Strategy-1.pdf

This doc. points out the Byden policies “fact pattern” (legal terminology) = treasonous! + “**confidence can only be won back when…those who used their counterterrorism powers as a weapon against the innocent pay the full judicial cost for their crimes against the civil rights of innocent Americans”

AI summary /outline of the policy

Presidential Foreword

The document opens with President Trump presenting the strategy as a return to “America First” national security and “Peace through Strength.” The foreword argues that previous administrations weakened U.S. security through poor border enforcement, failed foreign policy, and weak counterterrorism policies.

Key claims include:

The capture of the Abbey Gate attack mastermind Recovery of over 100 American hostages Expanded action against cartels and gangs Operations targeting Iran’s military and nuclear infrastructure Declaring some Muslim Brotherhood branches terrorist organizations Using military force against cartel operations The tone establishes the strategy as aggressive, offensive, and sovereignty-focused.

Introduction | Good Versus Bad Counterterrorism (Pages 4–5)

This section defines the philosophy behind the new counterterrorism framework.

Main arguments:

Counterterrorism should focus solely on protecting Americans Intelligence and security agencies should not be politicized Prior administrations allegedly weaponized CT tools against political opponents Americans lost trust in federal institutions due to perceived political targeting The document claims a “new domestic terrorism” threat has emerged involving violent extremists opposed to traditional American values. It also states that CT efforts will be “apolitical” and rooted in “reality-based threat assessments.”

The Threat (Page 5)

The strategy identifies three primary categories of terrorist threats:

[1] Narcoterrorists and Transnational Gangs Drug cartels Smuggling organizations Human trafficking groups [2] Legacy Islamist Terrorists al Qaeda ISIS Islamist networks [3] Violent Left-Wing Extremists Anarchists Anti-fascist groups Radical ideological movements

The report argues these groups are often supported by hostile states seeking to weaken the United States. It describes fentanyl trafficking and border insecurity as existential national threats.

Our Counterterrorism Strategy (Pages 6–7)

This section explains the operational framework of the strategy.

Core Principles

America is the homeland and first priority Terrorist threats should be neutralized aggressively CT tools must not be used politically Offensive cyber and military operations are legitimate tools Main Priorities

Destroying cartel infrastructure Targeting Islamist terrorist organizations Neutralizing violent domestic extremist groups Preventing WMD terrorism The strategy proposes:

Expanded use of FTO designations Cyber warfare Financial sanctions Intelligence operations Military campaigns against “external operations-capable” groups The document also emphasizes identifying state sponsors assisting terror organizations.

The Goals of Our CT Strategy (Page 7)

The report summarizes counterterrorism into three main missions:

[1] Identify terrorists before attacks occur [2] Cut off weapons, funding, and recruitment [3] Destroy established terrorist groups

Operational tools include:

Military strikes Intelligence operations Diplomatic pressure Covert operations Financial disruption Cyber campaigns The section emphasizes prioritization due to limited resources despite U.S. military strength.

Counterterrorism Resources (Pages 8–9)

This section outlines the institutions and capabilities supporting the CT strategy.

Resources include:

Intelligence agencies Special operations forces Treasury sanctions teams Homeland Security International CT partnerships

The report highlights:

Offensive information warfare Counter-propaganda efforts International burden-sharing Use of sanctions against terror-linked entities

It argues prior administrations weakened information operations for political reasons and that these capabilities are now being restored.

Counterterrorism and Presidential Diplomacy (Page 9)

The document describes diplomacy as a strategic CT tool.

Key themes:

Hostage recovery operations Pressure on governments detaining Americans Diplomatic leverage against state sponsors of terrorism The strategy argues that diplomacy, backed by military strength, can force adversaries to release detained Americans without concessions.

Counterterrorism by Region (Pages 10–14)

A. Our Hemisphere (Page 10)

The Western Hemisphere is presented as the highest-priority region..

Main goals:

Destroy cartel infrastructure Stop fentanyl trafficking Prevent illegal migration Eliminate cartel financial networks Key claims:

U.S. military strikes reduced maritime drug smuggling by over 90% Nicolás Maduro was captured and extradited Cartels and terrorist groups are operationally linked The strategy states the U.S. will act unilaterally if regional governments fail to cooperate.

B. The Middle East (Pages 11–12)

This section focuses on:

Iran Hezbollah ISIS al Qaeda Hamas Houthis

Key points:

Iran is described as the primary state sponsor of terror

Maritime security in the Red Sea and Strait of Hormuz is a strategic priority Military commanders were given expanded strike authority Muslim Brotherhood branches are being designated as terrorist groups The strategy argues that modern Islamist terrorism traces its ideological roots to the Muslim Brotherhood.

C. Europe (Page 12)

Europe is described both as:

America’s most important CT partner A vulnerable operating environment for terrorism

The report criticizes:

Open-border policies Mass migration Weak CT spending Failure to confront Islamist extremism Recommendations include:

Increased CT investment Greater intelligence sharing Stronger border controls Countering “hybrid threats” like sabotage and assassination plots

D. Africa (Pages 13–14)

Africa is presented as a growing terrorist safe haven after ISIS lost its territorial caliphate.

Major concerns:

ISIS resurgence al Shabaab Sahel instability Christian persecution The strategy proposes:

Limited U.S. military footprint Increased local partner involvement Intelligence-sharing Protection of Christian populations The document rejects large-scale “nation-building” missions while supporting targeted CT partnerships.

E. Asia (Page 14)

This section focuses on:

Islamist radicalization Diaspora recruitment Maritime trade routes Terror networks operating across Asia

Key proposals:*

Expanded regional partnerships Counter-propaganda operations Intelligence cooperation Shared CT burden with regional allies The report states that wealthy regional nations should assume greater responsibility for counterterrorism operations.

Terrorists and Weapons of Mass Destruction (Page 15)

The document labels WMD prevention as a “no-fail mission.”

Threats identified:

Nuclear terrorism Chemical attacks Biological weapons Radiological devices AI-enabled terrorism Autonomous weapons Additive manufacturing technologies The strategy also classifies fentanyl trafficking as a WMD-scale threat because of overdose deaths.

Main objectives:

Deny terrorists access to WMD materials Hold state sponsors accountable Maintain global crisis-response capabilities Improve detection and attribution technologies America First Counterterrorism (Page 16)

The final section summarizes the strategy as:

Reality-based Sovereignty-focused Aggressive Anti-globalist Security-first The report concludes that the United States will use all instruments of national power — diplomatic, intelligence, military, economic, cyber, and law enforcement — to destroy threats against Americans.

The document frames the strategy as a complete departure from prior “forever war” and nation-building policies and a return to direct action and homeland defense.

u/#pepepopcorn

so Albert Bourla CEO of Pfizer is still at large?