I saw the post a few hours ago, keeping it under advisement, thinking of the 72 hour rule.

It would have been a hell of story if true.

CIA being prohibited by law to any action of American soil, raiding the offices of the DNI? That would not only amount to a palace coup, but an overt declaration of rebellion against a sitting President.

The fall-out from such an action would be .... devastating to the CIA itself.

So, why now?

1. It falls clearly within the scope of the attacks on key people within the Trump administration. [Noem, Hegseth, Gabbard] One could pose the question: what is the common denominator here?
2. Timing. Potus is in China negotiating, holding a hand of cards enough to squeeze CCP of the map. Is it not peculiar that exactly in this moment, such a claim surfaces? What could be the objective? Yeah, right: the covid files ...chayna....biolabs (which DNI already identified)
3. The claim is of such extraordinary nature, that more than extraordinary proof should be required to hold up under a sniff test. Hence, the 72 hour rule. Especially when it is a flagrant violation of law and executive order.
4. My words were twisted. https://x.com/RepLuna/status/2054932076718109120

She writes:

stating falsely that I claimed there was a raid on Tulsi Gabbard’s office by the CIA. This is completely false. There is no clip or statement that exists.

Listen carefully: Did she say: This is what the whistleblower claims? She says: we were notified this happened. And I acted upon it.