Basically SCOTUS would not hear the petition to review the 9th Circuit Courts ruling. Therefore, it must be handled state by state in their respective legislatures. It will be up to the people to refuse these mandates. That is where we are folks. There needs to be better cases built with the goal of getting SCOTUS to actually make a ruling that would apply nationally. This is how this stuff works.
How sad that SCOTUS can't fix the problem of "mandated healthcare crap" ... America was built on FREEDOMS ...so what's their problem in RECOGNIZING "freedom to NOT BE VAXXED"??? 😱😡💥
I wonder what the "vote count" was on DENYING CERT???
Thank you. I am not sure I understand what your question is asking. From what I understand, this matter was not heard by the high court. The petition to hear the case before the full court was denied thus leaving the lower appellate ruling stand. That would be Justice Elena Kagan that reviews emergency petitions for the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals. That may simply be a failing in the petition itself to make the matter hearable by the full court. Basically the high court refused to hear the matter on its merits. That was the risk of the petition for review coming out of the 9th Circuit Court for SCOTUS. It has to make it past the 9th Circuit gatekeeper which is Kagan. Although the case out of Calif was important, the matter may have to originate from another similar lawsuit coming out of a different Circuit Court to get to the full court. Say from the 11th Circuit Court which would be Justice Thomas' jurisdiction. That is just how the system works. However, the 9th Circuit Court's history has probably one of the highest number of reversals of any US Appellate Court in the country. If at first you don't succeed, try again - just through a different court.
Basically SCOTUS would not hear the petition to review the 9th Circuit Courts ruling. Therefore, it must be handled state by state in their respective legislatures. It will be up to the people to refuse these mandates. That is where we are folks. There needs to be better cases built with the goal of getting SCOTUS to actually make a ruling that would apply nationally. This is how this stuff works.
Thy can mandate all they want. They still cant actually force me to take it.
Right there with you fren. In the end, it will be up to all of us to tell them to take their mandates and shove them.
When they engineer the vaccine to self-disseminate, will mandates mean anything since we will not be able to choose to take or not?
GGGGGGGGGGGGREAT clarification...THNX
How sad that SCOTUS can't fix the problem of "mandated healthcare crap" ... America was built on FREEDOMS ...so what's their problem in RECOGNIZING "freedom to NOT BE VAXXED"??? 😱😡💥
I wonder what the "vote count" was on DENYING CERT???
Thank you. I am not sure I understand what your question is asking. From what I understand, this matter was not heard by the high court. The petition to hear the case before the full court was denied thus leaving the lower appellate ruling stand. That would be Justice Elena Kagan that reviews emergency petitions for the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals. That may simply be a failing in the petition itself to make the matter hearable by the full court. Basically the high court refused to hear the matter on its merits. That was the risk of the petition for review coming out of the 9th Circuit Court for SCOTUS. It has to make it past the 9th Circuit gatekeeper which is Kagan. Although the case out of Calif was important, the matter may have to originate from another similar lawsuit coming out of a different Circuit Court to get to the full court. Say from the 11th Circuit Court which would be Justice Thomas' jurisdiction. That is just how the system works. However, the 9th Circuit Court's history has probably one of the highest number of reversals of any US Appellate Court in the country. If at first you don't succeed, try again - just through a different court.