Kirsch, a vaccine-injured man, has been putting out information on the subject for years now. Still no (or almost no) traction with the mainstream propaganda centers. At least SOME movement on the issue in the Trump admin, but nothing like what will be needed to bring real help to those harmed and to ensure another such disaster is never allowed to be pushed on us in the future.
Note: https://airtable.com/, the site linked below to the surveys and data, isn't loading for me and I've not been able to view the contents of those links.
https://kirschsubstack.com/p/as-many-as-2m-americans-were-seriously
I recently did two surveys (your family and your medical practice if you work in a medical practice).
The full live results can be viewed here: family and medical practice. The Notes column is available as well. Only the emails were removed for privacy reasons. The records count at the time of this article were 2908 and 107.
I had Claude Opus 4.7 co-work evaluate the survey solicitations, the survey questions, the survey results, the notes column, my reader base and gave it unrestricted use of publicly available data (CDC, Insurance industry, FRED data, etc) to reconcile everything. This allowed Claude to give me a more objective answer because my reader base is not representative (e.g., half of the respondents had no vaccinated family members) and because my reader base are more likely to attribute disability and deaths to the vaccine.
The key results:
As many as 1M Americans killed by the COVID vaccine
As many as 1.5M working-age Americans disabled for 6 months or more
Silence from health authorities worldwide on this issue. Not a single national public-health authority, anywhere in the world, has produced an estimate of the type constructed in this article — a comprehensive, all-cause, all-ages, attributable-deaths-plus-disabilities total for the COVID-19 vaccines.
(Graphs and other data in the original)
. . . I asked Claude if any other health authority has done a similar analysis.
Answer: no.
. . . The asymmetry
There is an asymmetric pattern in what public health officials have estimated:
Multiple large official and quasi-official estimates of deaths prevented by COVID vaccines: the Commonwealth Fund (~3.2M US deaths prevented through 2022), Imperial College (millions globally), WHO Europe (1.4M lives saved), various Lancet papers. These are policy-shaping numbers.
Zero official estimates of total deaths caused by COVID vaccines, despite using broadly the same counterfactual modeling techniques that would be required.
The asymmetry is striking and is the reason the public conversation has the shape it does: one side of the ledger gets quantified at population scale, the other side does not.
. . . Summary
Claude noted that its estimates were “reconcilable with every independent dataset above.”
So they can’t write this analysis off. [Just WATCH THEM do so!]
The fact that no public health official anywhere in the world has ever even attempted to estimate the number of disabled and killed by the COVID shots is not surprising. None want to know the damage they have caused. There appears to be no political will to do that.
If you ask any public official (lawmaker, public health official) how many people the COVID shots have disabled and killed, the honest answer would be “We don’t know and we really don’t want to know.”
Sticking your head in the sand?
Similarly, The New York Times, Washington Post, Wall St. Journal, CNN, 60 Minutes, etc. Well, they don’t want to know either. They could have easily done what I just did.
None of them want to know. It’s that simple.
That is not serving the public interest, is it?
Not only that but...They made VAERS so obscure and convoluted that hardly anyone (those not afraid of repercussions...) actually reported observed adverse reactions.
u/#WoahCat
👍
Where are the results?
A summary of the key results are in the text above, in my post.
If you can't read the entire article, you'll need to subscribe (worthwhile if you're interested in the topic) or click the links included in the text above to go to the primary documents. As I said (and still true), I haven't been able to get those to load so haven't seen them.
I'd argue that some of them do want to know. The ChiCom Theresa Tam in Canada for example. They want to know how successful their kill program was, how far it fell below target, and thus inform how to sculpt their second attempt.