Engaging with and being able to hold meaningful conversation with those who differ from you is a fantastic skill to possess.

Charlie Kirk did this on a regular basis and we loved him for it. At every event, he spoke with people whose lives and worldviews varied vastly from his own. His goal was to get to a place where the two of them agreed on something because that's where civil discourse begins. If we're not willing to engage with those who think differently from us, how do we share Truth?

Why is it different if the interviewee is already famous/infamous? It's because there are preconceived notions about him/her. Those notions may end up being correct in the end, but why is it considered wrong to engage in the conversation? All humans are redeemable according to God. Are we afraid that we'll find a place where we have something in common with the guy? I needed redemption as much as I know this guy needs it.

Of note, Joe Biden had three children: Beau established a child predator task force and worked to get convictions for child predators, enact mandatory sentences for child abusers, etc, during his time as AG of Delaware. Ashley famously "lost" a diary detailing abuse by her father. Hunter famously "lost" a laptop detailing nefarious dealings by his father and his very broken son.

Three kids who were (most likely) victimized by their father. Three different outcomes which point to that (alleged) abuse. I've thought there was more to Hunter Biden for years. Yes, I believe he should be in prison for pedophilia and yes, I believe the drug-fueled behavior has destroyed multiple lives.

He was also willing to have a conversation. In that conversation, he talked about spending time in confession which reminded me that I should spend more time in confession, too.