I do not understand why the OP on X has put misinformation into his post when the email as it stands is incredibly damming.
The email DOES NOT read "‘Trying to give the fucking vegetable, particularly during the debate on Thursday, a talking point to push back on Trump on this issue.’”
It reads "Trying to give the campaign...."
There is no faster way to lose an argument than to overstate one's case. I don't know if this "Real_Robert" is an idiot or if he's deliberately trying to insert a poison pill into a damning communication.
Just something to be aware of folks if you forward this post to the Leftists/Communists in your life. They'll latch onto the hyperbole and use it as a rationale to dismiss treason.
Brandon WAS an FV, but on such a crucial piece of evidence, exaggerating, misrepresenting the document is inexcusable.
Using the actual words “campaign” presents potential line of defense, but still not a good look.
Intel community needs to take a seat…
Maybe regain credibility in, say, a century of just doing their effin’ jobs. When it comes to possessing any special insight into political campaigns, former “Intelligence Community” members need to have a nice hot cup of shut the F up.
Behavior looks like “true believers” and “fellow travelers” to be sure.
I do not understand why the OP on X has put misinformation into his post when the email as it stands is incredibly damming.
The email DOES NOT read "‘Trying to give the fucking vegetable, particularly during the debate on Thursday, a talking point to push back on Trump on this issue.’”
It reads "Trying to give the campaign...."
There is no faster way to lose an argument than to overstate one's case. I don't know if this "Real_Robert" is an idiot or if he's deliberately trying to insert a poison pill into a damning communication.
Just something to be aware of folks if you forward this post to the Leftists/Communists in your life. They'll latch onto the hyperbole and use it as a rationale to dismiss treason.
That is excellent point and good catch.
Brandon WAS an FV, but on such a crucial piece of evidence, exaggerating, misrepresenting the document is inexcusable.
Using the actual words “campaign” presents potential line of defense, but still not a good look.
Intel community needs to take a seat…
Maybe regain credibility in, say, a century of just doing their effin’ jobs. When it comes to possessing any special insight into political campaigns, former “Intelligence Community” members need to have a nice hot cup of shut the F up.
Behavior looks like “true believers” and “fellow travelers” to be sure.