It's like looking at clouds and finding human faces and animals in the cloud shapes. You'll see shapes that look familiar, and then your mind tries to make sense of the shape. .
In this case, these just look like taxable income ranges.
Maybe! I’ve said that exact thing myself with a lot of “decodes”.
There’s no way the 1776 was an accident, but any of the 17’s could absolutely just be staring at clouds.
Funny that the amount that the 24% bracket is calculated on is almost exactly 17%, either way. You’re probably right, and it’s just a coincidence. Kek.
Seeing as the correct amount would be 17966 and OP changed it to the incongruous 71966, without boasting of another 17, seeing as the OP didn't boast of "201775" or "103291.75" that contain 17, the answer is yes, it's OP's imagination.
As you know, the actual tax code is designed to tell us that you are free to voluntary assess yourself as owing the government, even if the code is written so deceptively that it's trillions of dollars easy to overassess yourself. Tax pros brag that people are overpaying by "billions" and they can help, but that's basically revelation of method.
Am not a pro decoder, for the record. Got one that I’m convinced on, another 2 or 3 that eehhhh maybe, and a handful of “hmmmmm!”s like this one.
Didn’t notice that the 17k was flipped to 71k in the bracket image. A correct 17k from a correct image was used for the original calculations, and the 71 made it in while transcribing from this erroneous one.
Just seemed peculiar that they would shove the 100k bracket up juuuuust high enough above it that the net 100k tax amount was 17%.
Looks like imagination at work.
It's like looking at clouds and finding human faces and animals in the cloud shapes. You'll see shapes that look familiar, and then your mind tries to make sense of the shape. .
In this case, these just look like taxable income ranges.
Maybe! I’ve said that exact thing myself with a lot of “decodes”.
There’s no way the 1776 was an accident, but any of the 17’s could absolutely just be staring at clouds.
Funny that the amount that the 24% bracket is calculated on is almost exactly 17%, either way. You’re probably right, and it’s just a coincidence. Kek.
Seeing as the correct amount would be 17966 and OP changed it to the incongruous 71966, without boasting of another 17, seeing as the OP didn't boast of "201775" or "103291.75" that contain 17, the answer is yes, it's OP's imagination.
As you know, the actual tax code is designed to tell us that you are free to voluntary assess yourself as owing the government, even if the code is written so deceptively that it's trillions of dollars easy to overassess yourself. Tax pros brag that people are overpaying by "billions" and they can help, but that's basically revelation of method.
Am not a pro decoder, for the record. Got one that I’m convinced on, another 2 or 3 that eehhhh maybe, and a handful of “hmmmmm!”s like this one.
Didn’t notice that the 17k was flipped to 71k in the bracket image. A correct 17k from a correct image was used for the original calculations, and the 71 made it in while transcribing from this erroneous one.
Just seemed peculiar that they would shove the 100k bracket up juuuuust high enough above it that the net 100k tax amount was 17%.