But WAY more interested in anything dealing with Antarctica. I believe Antarctica is THE keystone holding back so much that's been suppressed about humanity's past.
With the proverbial knee bone connecting to the leg bone - there's a lot of of things that are adjacent to Antarctica in terms of our history.
You've got the mythical island of Mu, of course Atlantis and all of that, Lemuria and to a lesser degree on the other pole, Hyperborea.
The mythical Mu, which allegedly was geographically adjacent to Antarctica AND of course, Easter Island and the "missing tablets" aka Rongorongo, an indigenous writing system from Rapa Nui.
There's just so much entangled with Antarctica... it's a huge subject. Of course that's not to mention plenty of theories regarding, land beyond the poles, like Byrd mentioned, UFO/alien structures and alleged stories by military personnel that talked to Linda Moulton Howe about massive underground structures that defy belief. LOTS to research and unwind on this subject for sure!
I listened to this yesterday. I wonder what Hancock is referencing when he admits to trying to get his word out ahead of "....personal information that will be used to slander him in the next two months..."
Curious, as he doesn't deny what these allegations are... and, given he is very open about his past concerning drug usage and such, it really makes you wonder what dirt is fixing to come out against him.
As a long time fan of Mr. Hancock, it pains me to say that tidbit leaves little to the imagination as to what he is vaguely referencing. My best guess is that he engaged in a relationship with a teenager or something similar in the past.
Since the show was two hours and I really didn't want to watch all of it, could you tell us if this episode had anything to do with discoveries in Antartica? Thanks.
Sure, no problem. Absolutely nothing new in terms of information that Hancock (and others) have hypothesized and speculated upon.
The only major difference I noticed in his presentation is that he (as well as others e.g. Randall Carlson) are now connecting their previous Younger Dryas hypothesis to a greater "Atlantean" (for lack of better words) civilization.
So basically NO, there is not new information or proof (besides some brief mentions of the subterranean Egyptian stuff that has gone mainstream in recent years) of anything relating to Antarctica
... just rearranging of Hancock's own hypothesis to cover a broader definition of the antidiluvian world.
Thank you for your reply. The title of the video is somewhat misleading, but that's why I asked for a quick synopsis. I appreciate your effort at appeasing my curiosity.
u/#spicy
I'm curious about the scuttlebutt...
But WAY more interested in anything dealing with Antarctica. I believe Antarctica is THE keystone holding back so much that's been suppressed about humanity's past.
With the proverbial knee bone connecting to the leg bone - there's a lot of of things that are adjacent to Antarctica in terms of our history.
You've got the mythical island of Mu, of course Atlantis and all of that, Lemuria and to a lesser degree on the other pole, Hyperborea.
The mythical Mu, which allegedly was geographically adjacent to Antarctica AND of course, Easter Island and the "missing tablets" aka Rongorongo, an indigenous writing system from Rapa Nui.
There's just so much entangled with Antarctica... it's a huge subject. Of course that's not to mention plenty of theories regarding, land beyond the poles, like Byrd mentioned, UFO/alien structures and alleged stories by military personnel that talked to Linda Moulton Howe about massive underground structures that defy belief. LOTS to research and unwind on this subject for sure!
Ahhhhh, a kindred spirit ☘️💚🐸
I listened to this yesterday. I wonder what Hancock is referencing when he admits to trying to get his word out ahead of "....personal information that will be used to slander him in the next two months..."
Curious, as he doesn't deny what these allegations are... and, given he is very open about his past concerning drug usage and such, it really makes you wonder what dirt is fixing to come out against him.
As a long time fan of Mr. Hancock, it pains me to say that tidbit leaves little to the imagination as to what he is vaguely referencing. My best guess is that he engaged in a relationship with a teenager or something similar in the past.
Since the show was two hours and I really didn't want to watch all of it, could you tell us if this episode had anything to do with discoveries in Antartica? Thanks.
Sure, no problem. Absolutely nothing new in terms of information that Hancock (and others) have hypothesized and speculated upon.
The only major difference I noticed in his presentation is that he (as well as others e.g. Randall Carlson) are now connecting their previous Younger Dryas hypothesis to a greater "Atlantean" (for lack of better words) civilization.
So basically NO, there is not new information or proof (besides some brief mentions of the subterranean Egyptian stuff that has gone mainstream in recent years) of anything relating to Antarctica ... just rearranging of Hancock's own hypothesis to cover a broader definition of the antidiluvian world.
Thank you for your reply. The title of the video is somewhat misleading, but that's why I asked for a quick synopsis. I appreciate your effort at appeasing my curiosity.
What a wonderful man!