Anons on this site tend to blindly trust anyone who is on Trump's team and we know from the past, that not everyone on his team is good. Actually many of them are evil. Tulsi has some shady connections in her past.
We should not 'blindly' trust anyone, but go in with eyes well open. It's important to be informed and apply reasoning, critical thinking and then reach conclusions or opinions this way.
But as I have done in the past, I want to question the whole concept of 'trust'. I mean, what kind of trust are you/we talking about? Do you trust [N] to babysit your kids? Do you trust them with your money?
I think by 'trust' here you actually mean 'assign a credibility to' or something, because in reality, the 'trusting' part isn't substantial. And, as far as any government official or organization is concerned, trust should not be equated with 'no need to have oversight or to hold accountable'. That is the fundamental responsibility of citizens in a nation where the government is the servant of the people it serves.
I always knew Tulsi was on the white hat team.
Don't just assume things anon, because she made a post. How do we even now they are the ones posting?
Well said.
Fwiw, even if Gabbard is posting this herself, it doesn't require special 'white hat' privilege.
But, "on the white hat team"? So is anyone who supports Trump, his agenda, and the side of goodness in the war of good vs evil.
Anons on this site tend to blindly trust anyone who is on Trump's team and we know from the past, that not everyone on his team is good. Actually many of them are evil. Tulsi has some shady connections in her past.
Such as?
We should not 'blindly' trust anyone, but go in with eyes well open. It's important to be informed and apply reasoning, critical thinking and then reach conclusions or opinions this way.
But as I have done in the past, I want to question the whole concept of 'trust'. I mean, what kind of trust are you/we talking about? Do you trust [N] to babysit your kids? Do you trust them with your money?
I think by 'trust' here you actually mean 'assign a credibility to' or something, because in reality, the 'trusting' part isn't substantial. And, as far as any government official or organization is concerned, trust should not be equated with 'no need to have oversight or to hold accountable'. That is the fundamental responsibility of citizens in a nation where the government is the servant of the people it serves.