Armand Hammer most famously refers to the influential 20th-century American oil tycoon, art collector, and philanthropist who led Occidental Petroleum. However, the name is also well-known today through his great-grandson, actor Armie Hammer, and the critically acclaimed hip-hop duo of the same name.
"Why âCitizen Vigilanteâ Is Being Blocked in Germany
By Uwe Boll (**AUTHOR AND DIRECTOR OF THE MOVIE)
Mon, May 25, 2026
While âCitizen Vigilanteâ is showing in other countries, Uwe Bollâs film has not been approved by the FSK in Germany. Eight reviewers have thus decided that a film about migrant crime, violence, and the failure of the justice system should not reach German audiences.
Developing, financing, and producing a film often takes years and involves an immense financial, emotional, and time investment. Each of my films represents not only money but also the passion and energy of hundreds of crew members.
For readers who donât feel like reading a lengthy article about the FSK (the German Film Industryâs Voluntary Self-Regulation Body), hereâs the short version first: I shot the English-language action thriller âCitizen Vigilanteâ in Croatia, starring U.S. actor Armie Hammer (The Social Network, Death on the Nile, Hotel Mumbai, etc.) and Costas Mandylor (My Big Fat Greek Wedding, Greenland, etc.). The film will be shown in every other country in the world and will generally be accessible to viewers aged 16 and older. It opens in the U.S. on June 19.
But not in Germany.
According to the FSK, the film promotes vigilante justice. Thatâs why a review juryâcomposed like a broadcasting council, a lay judgesâ court, or a board of directorsâdecided not to rate the film for ages 18 and up or assign it the âKJâ rating (not approved for minors), but instead to label it âKKâ (no rating). This means that not only should minors under 18 not see the film, but ultimately no one shouldâregardless of age.
Eight people selected by the FSK thus decide what adult citizens in Germany are allowed to watch and what they are not. The âKKâ label ensures that all providers in Germany who show or sell filmsâfrom Amazon to retailers like MĂźller and MediaMarkt, as well as movie theaters, streaming services, and TV stationsâwill not offer the film. The irony is: The film is neither pornographic nor extremely violent. The level of violence is on par with films like John Wick starring Keanu Reeves or The Equalizer starring Denzel Washington.
So what is the real reason for this ban? Our main character becomes a wanted terrorist and, at the same time, a social media hero because she hunts down criminals and also takes action against mass rapists.
The mass rapists in the film are young migrants, which, according to crime statistics, is unfortunately particularly common in cases of mass rape. Letâs recall a case in Hamburg that, among other things, inspired me to write the screenplay, as I am a filmmaker who likes to grapple with reality in a clear and unflinching way.
Of the nine young men convicted, only one actually had to go to prison at the time of the verdict.
In November 2023, the Hamburg Regional Court sentenced nine men between the ages of 19 and 23 to juvenile sentences ranging from one year to two years and nine months for the rape of a 15-year-old girl.
For eight of the nine convicted men, the sentence was either suspended directly on probation or the decision on suspension was initially left open as part of a so-called âpreliminary probationâ process.
Since the perpetrators were between 17 and 20 years old at the time of the crime, juvenile criminal law was applied, which prioritizes rehabilitation over punishment. The court justified the suspended sentences, among other things, by citing the long time that had elapsed since the crime in 2020 and the perpetratorsâ positive social development since then.
Two other defendants were acquitted because their involvement in the crime could not be proven beyond a reasonable doubt.
Both the judge and the press referred to the âpoor, traumatized perpetratorsâ at the time. This is, of course, a joke and a mockery of the victim, because rape is a serious crime. The court seemed indifferent to victim protection, as the girl in question continues to live in the same city as the perpetrators, who are not in custody.
My film is fictional and is subject to entirely different criteria than a documentary.
In my assessment, the FSKâs intention with this rating is not only to ensure that minors are protected from the film, but also to ensure that as few people as possible in Germany get to see it at all. Since, according to my research, âCitizen Vigilanteâ is the only film that takes a critical look at crime committed by migrants, it is precisely this one filmâthe only one that seeks to portray the reality on the streets, in back alleys, and in the bushes across Europe as it actually unfoldsâthat is being blocked. In my view, this is a politically motivated decision by the FSK that reflects a larger problem in our society.
This problem is the trendâclearly visible for yearsâof the ruling parties, in collaboration with public broadcasters, NGOs such as Correctiv, as well as taxpayer-funded social media campaigns and reporting platforms like âTrusted Flaggers,â to maintain and expand their power, privileges, and positions under the guise of âdo-goodismâ and the âfight against Nazis.â Anyone who opposes them is denigrated as anti-democratic and, if necessary, prosecuted under criminal or civil law. In this interpretation, the protection of minorsâincluding under the European Digital Services Actâis merely a façade for political censorship and control of public opinion.
Freedom of art must also apply here, in accordance with Article 5, Paragraph 3, Sentence 1 of the Basic Law. It simply states: âArt and science, research and teaching are free.â
This fundamental right is among the most strongly protected freedoms in the German Constitution.
There is no legal reservation: Unlike freedom of expression under Article 5, Paragraph 2 of the Basic Law, freedom of art contains no explicit restrictions through âgeneral laws.â The state may neither censor art based on its content nor judge whether it is âgoodâ or âbad.â This is the so-called prohibition against the state acting as a judge of art.
The protection is comprehensive: Both the creation of the workâthat is, the sphere of creationâand its presentation and disseminationâthat is, the sphere of impactâare protected, so that art can reach the public at all.
The historical background is clear: The framers of the Basic Law enshrined this strong right in direct response to the Nazi dictatorship, during which art was defamed as âdegenerate artâ and banned.
The FSK is using the pretext of protecting minors to undermine the Basic Law in this instance, even though minors would be protected by an 18+ rating. In my case, this is happening because this specific part of the film depicts a reality that people do not want to acknowledge: the reality that mass migration from predominantly Muslim countries has severely undermined the security situation in Germany. Instead of ensuring the safety of the populationâfor example, by directly deporting non-German criminals and reducing migration from Africaâefforts are being made to suppress reporting on the security threat.
With this decision, the FSK mayâwithout even realizing itâbe serving not the protection of minors, but the preservation of the current government and its status quo, at the expense of freedom of speech, freedom of the press, and artistic freedom. The thousands of criminal complaints that politicians in Germany file against dissatisfied citizens who voice their opinions online are further evidence of the ruling classâs determination to suppress freedom through intimidation. While all my films can be viewed uncut even in Austriaâand in 100 other countries as wellâI have also had major problems with the FSK in the past regarding six of my films. They were released in Germany only with mandatory cuts. With Citizen Vigilante, this was made impossible this time, as I would essentially have to cut out half the film. Thus, eight people determine what 50 million adults in Germany are allowed to consume.
Following Hanau (FSK 16) and Run, Citizen Vigilante is the final part of my trilogy Germany in Winter, which aims to expose the dangers and political consequences of our time and, precisely through its radical narrative style, makes it clear that violence is not a solution. Our character Sanders is not a good person and is not portrayed as one either. He is not a comic-book character like Batman, but a selfish, very wealthy businessman who, out of boredom, so to speak, begins to take justice into his own hands. Drug gangsters, teenage bullies, and two men who want to use drugs to subdue women are brought to justice. He goes to a brothel because no one loves him and he doesnât love anyone either; heâd rather pay for sex. When, in the end, he shoots teenage rapists along with an entire family and kills the judge who failed to send those rapists to prison, itâs so harsh and shocking that the viewer is more likely to conclude that this violence goes too far.
Iâm a genre filmmaker, but Iâve always been a political filmmaker as well (Darfur, Postal, Assault on Wall Street, Rampage, Barschel, etc.). All my films have received R ratings in the U.S. and in every other country in the worldâmeaning theyâre rated for audiences 16 and older. Only in Germany was this often different, and many films had to be cut in order to even receive an 18+ rating. In the case of Rampage, in which a mass murderer gets away with it, I had to cut several gory scenes and include a note in the end credits stating that the main character was apprehended by the police in order to obtain a rating. When Rampage 2 came out, many viewers in Germany asked how it could be that he wasnât in prison. That was a direct infringement on artistic freedom and caused me harm, because Rampage and all the other censored Boll films would have been better received by critics and audiences if they had remained uncut.
Movies must show reality, comment on it, and even cause pain. They must be able to make people angry and spark discussions. In Run, I show my empathy for migrants; in Hanau, the madness of a deluded racist gunman; and in Citizen Vigilante, a dark character who doesnât really bring about justice, even if he commits acts that some people approve of.
In an age when even children can see real-life killings and pornography at any time on streaming services and social media platforms, the FSK has lost any justification for its existence anyway. We even have to pay over 1,000 euros for these unnecessary reviews. In most countriesâsuch as Austria, Scandinavia, or the Benelux countriesâthere is no FSK. There, the film distributors themselves indicate on a DVD or in the stream the minimum age for which a film is suitable. For horror movies, for example, the cover says â18 and up,â because no one wants to watch horror movies rated for ages 12 and upâfans expect violence and blood. These self-assigned ratings are by no means misleading; they are sufficient. The FSK should be abolished. Alternatively, DVD retailers and at least the streaming platforms should distance themselves from it and announce that they will no longer adhere to FSK ratings."
Reactions here in Germany so far have ranged from cinematic criticismâfor example, comparisons to Death Wish or John Wickâto a fundamental rejection of any form of vigilante justice, even within right-wing circles.
But I think the Streisand effect will soon take hold here. Far too many similar things are happening here in Germany. This, combined with the escalating battles over the distribution of ever-dwindling fundsâparticularly pensions, funding for retirement and nursing homes, kindergartens, and schoolsâwill ensure that it does.
EDIT lost context:
Merz was asked by a AfD member of parliament whether he considers cutting immigration costs, Ukraine armament or development eid instead of taxing the Germans even higher.
Merz replied that the government simply had different priorities than the AfD and that it, after all, held the parliamentary majority.
Furthermore, the majority of the population would think the same way.
Germany bans a film showing a vigilante hitting migrant criminals and corrupt officials then wonders why people push back. Now flash drives are floating across the border from Poland straight into Berlin. Nothing says own goal like trying to memory hole content about protecting your own people. The Streisand play is already in motion and the regime looks dumber by the hour. Keep launching.
Should be red balloons.
Kek
99?
The damned balloon song
Everyone here knows Armand Hammer tho, right?
"Armie"...cute...
u/#pepedetective
u/#wtf
What are the chances?
u/#clownworld
I absolutely agree but since the song was originally in German the word was "luftballoons" which just means "balloons" without mentioning the color.
Very relevant nonetheless.
"This is what we've waited for This is it boys - this is war!"
I know,but I went with the american version.
With the German accent, I had a crush on her when I was a kid đ
"Why âCitizen Vigilanteâ Is Being Blocked in Germany
By Uwe Boll (**AUTHOR AND DIRECTOR OF THE MOVIE)
Mon, May 25, 2026 While âCitizen Vigilanteâ is showing in other countries, Uwe Bollâs film has not been approved by the FSK in Germany. Eight reviewers have thus decided that a film about migrant crime, violence, and the failure of the justice system should not reach German audiences.
Developing, financing, and producing a film often takes years and involves an immense financial, emotional, and time investment. Each of my films represents not only money but also the passion and energy of hundreds of crew members. For readers who donât feel like reading a lengthy article about the FSK (the German Film Industryâs Voluntary Self-Regulation Body), hereâs the short version first: I shot the English-language action thriller âCitizen Vigilanteâ in Croatia, starring U.S. actor Armie Hammer (The Social Network, Death on the Nile, Hotel Mumbai, etc.) and Costas Mandylor (My Big Fat Greek Wedding, Greenland, etc.). The film will be shown in every other country in the world and will generally be accessible to viewers aged 16 and older. It opens in the U.S. on June 19. But not in Germany. According to the FSK, the film promotes vigilante justice. Thatâs why a review juryâcomposed like a broadcasting council, a lay judgesâ court, or a board of directorsâdecided not to rate the film for ages 18 and up or assign it the âKJâ rating (not approved for minors), but instead to label it âKKâ (no rating). This means that not only should minors under 18 not see the film, but ultimately no one shouldâregardless of age. Eight people selected by the FSK thus decide what adult citizens in Germany are allowed to watch and what they are not. The âKKâ label ensures that all providers in Germany who show or sell filmsâfrom Amazon to retailers like MĂźller and MediaMarkt, as well as movie theaters, streaming services, and TV stationsâwill not offer the film. The irony is: The film is neither pornographic nor extremely violent. The level of violence is on par with films like John Wick starring Keanu Reeves or The Equalizer starring Denzel Washington. So what is the real reason for this ban? Our main character becomes a wanted terrorist and, at the same time, a social media hero because she hunts down criminals and also takes action against mass rapists. The mass rapists in the film are young migrants, which, according to crime statistics, is unfortunately particularly common in cases of mass rape. Letâs recall a case in Hamburg that, among other things, inspired me to write the screenplay, as I am a filmmaker who likes to grapple with reality in a clear and unflinching way. Of the nine young men convicted, only one actually had to go to prison at the time of the verdict. In November 2023, the Hamburg Regional Court sentenced nine men between the ages of 19 and 23 to juvenile sentences ranging from one year to two years and nine months for the rape of a 15-year-old girl. For eight of the nine convicted men, the sentence was either suspended directly on probation or the decision on suspension was initially left open as part of a so-called âpreliminary probationâ process. Since the perpetrators were between 17 and 20 years old at the time of the crime, juvenile criminal law was applied, which prioritizes rehabilitation over punishment. The court justified the suspended sentences, among other things, by citing the long time that had elapsed since the crime in 2020 and the perpetratorsâ positive social development since then. Two other defendants were acquitted because their involvement in the crime could not be proven beyond a reasonable doubt. Both the judge and the press referred to the âpoor, traumatized perpetratorsâ at the time. This is, of course, a joke and a mockery of the victim, because rape is a serious crime. The court seemed indifferent to victim protection, as the girl in question continues to live in the same city as the perpetrators, who are not in custody. My film is fictional and is subject to entirely different criteria than a documentary. In my assessment, the FSKâs intention with this rating is not only to ensure that minors are protected from the film, but also to ensure that as few people as possible in Germany get to see it at all. Since, according to my research, âCitizen Vigilanteâ is the only film that takes a critical look at crime committed by migrants, it is precisely this one filmâthe only one that seeks to portray the reality on the streets, in back alleys, and in the bushes across Europe as it actually unfoldsâthat is being blocked. In my view, this is a politically motivated decision by the FSK that reflects a larger problem in our society. This problem is the trendâclearly visible for yearsâof the ruling parties, in collaboration with public broadcasters, NGOs such as Correctiv, as well as taxpayer-funded social media campaigns and reporting platforms like âTrusted Flaggers,â to maintain and expand their power, privileges, and positions under the guise of âdo-goodismâ and the âfight against Nazis.â Anyone who opposes them is denigrated as anti-democratic and, if necessary, prosecuted under criminal or civil law. In this interpretation, the protection of minorsâincluding under the European Digital Services Actâis merely a façade for political censorship and control of public opinion. Freedom of art must also apply here, in accordance with Article 5, Paragraph 3, Sentence 1 of the Basic Law. It simply states: âArt and science, research and teaching are free.â This fundamental right is among the most strongly protected freedoms in the German Constitution. There is no legal reservation: Unlike freedom of expression under Article 5, Paragraph 2 of the Basic Law, freedom of art contains no explicit restrictions through âgeneral laws.â The state may neither censor art based on its content nor judge whether it is âgoodâ or âbad.â This is the so-called prohibition against the state acting as a judge of art. The protection is comprehensive: Both the creation of the workâthat is, the sphere of creationâand its presentation and disseminationâthat is, the sphere of impactâare protected, so that art can reach the public at all. The historical background is clear: The framers of the Basic Law enshrined this strong right in direct response to the Nazi dictatorship, during which art was defamed as âdegenerate artâ and banned. The FSK is using the pretext of protecting minors to undermine the Basic Law in this instance, even though minors would be protected by an 18+ rating. In my case, this is happening because this specific part of the film depicts a reality that people do not want to acknowledge: the reality that mass migration from predominantly Muslim countries has severely undermined the security situation in Germany. Instead of ensuring the safety of the populationâfor example, by directly deporting non-German criminals and reducing migration from Africaâefforts are being made to suppress reporting on the security threat. With this decision, the FSK mayâwithout even realizing itâbe serving not the protection of minors, but the preservation of the current government and its status quo, at the expense of freedom of speech, freedom of the press, and artistic freedom. The thousands of criminal complaints that politicians in Germany file against dissatisfied citizens who voice their opinions online are further evidence of the ruling classâs determination to suppress freedom through intimidation. While all my films can be viewed uncut even in Austriaâand in 100 other countries as wellâI have also had major problems with the FSK in the past regarding six of my films. They were released in Germany only with mandatory cuts. With Citizen Vigilante, this was made impossible this time, as I would essentially have to cut out half the film. Thus, eight people determine what 50 million adults in Germany are allowed to consume. Following Hanau (FSK 16) and Run, Citizen Vigilante is the final part of my trilogy Germany in Winter, which aims to expose the dangers and political consequences of our time and, precisely through its radical narrative style, makes it clear that violence is not a solution. Our character Sanders is not a good person and is not portrayed as one either. He is not a comic-book character like Batman, but a selfish, very wealthy businessman who, out of boredom, so to speak, begins to take justice into his own hands. Drug gangsters, teenage bullies, and two men who want to use drugs to subdue women are brought to justice. He goes to a brothel because no one loves him and he doesnât love anyone either; heâd rather pay for sex. When, in the end, he shoots teenage rapists along with an entire family and kills the judge who failed to send those rapists to prison, itâs so harsh and shocking that the viewer is more likely to conclude that this violence goes too far. Iâm a genre filmmaker, but Iâve always been a political filmmaker as well (Darfur, Postal, Assault on Wall Street, Rampage, Barschel, etc.). All my films have received R ratings in the U.S. and in every other country in the worldâmeaning theyâre rated for audiences 16 and older. Only in Germany was this often different, and many films had to be cut in order to even receive an 18+ rating. In the case of Rampage, in which a mass murderer gets away with it, I had to cut several gory scenes and include a note in the end credits stating that the main character was apprehended by the police in order to obtain a rating. When Rampage 2 came out, many viewers in Germany asked how it could be that he wasnât in prison. That was a direct infringement on artistic freedom and caused me harm, because Rampage and all the other censored Boll films would have been better received by critics and audiences if they had remained uncut. Movies must show reality, comment on it, and even cause pain. They must be able to make people angry and spark discussions. In Run, I show my empathy for migrants; in Hanau, the madness of a deluded racist gunman; and in Citizen Vigilante, a dark character who doesnât really bring about justice, even if he commits acts that some people approve of. In an age when even children can see real-life killings and pornography at any time on streaming services and social media platforms, the FSK has lost any justification for its existence anyway. We even have to pay over 1,000 euros for these unnecessary reviews. In most countriesâsuch as Austria, Scandinavia, or the Benelux countriesâthere is no FSK. There, the film distributors themselves indicate on a DVD or in the stream the minimum age for which a film is suitable. For horror movies, for example, the cover says â18 and up,â because no one wants to watch horror movies rated for ages 12 and upâfans expect violence and blood. These self-assigned ratings are by no means misleading; they are sufficient. The FSK should be abolished. Alternatively, DVD retailers and at least the streaming platforms should distance themselves from it and announce that they will no longer adhere to FSK ratings."
https://www.tichyseinblick.de/feuilleton/medien/citizen-vigilante-deutschland-fsk/
Reactions here in Germany so far have ranged from cinematic criticismâfor example, comparisons to Death Wish or John Wickâto a fundamental rejection of any form of vigilante justice, even within right-wing circles.
But I think the Streisand effect will soon take hold here. Far too many similar things are happening here in Germany. This, combined with the escalating battles over the distribution of ever-dwindling fundsâparticularly pensions, funding for retirement and nursing homes, kindergartens, and schoolsâwill ensure that it does.
continued:
EDIT lost context: Merz was asked by a AfD member of parliament whether he considers cutting immigration costs, Ukraine armament or development eid instead of taxing the Germans even higher.
Merz replied that the government simply had different priorities than the AfD and that it, after all, held the parliamentary majority. Furthermore, the majority of the population would think the same way.
Thanks, Elon!
Germany bans a film showing a vigilante hitting migrant criminals and corrupt officials then wonders why people push back. Now flash drives are floating across the border from Poland straight into Berlin. Nothing says own goal like trying to memory hole content about protecting your own people. The Streisand play is already in motion and the regime looks dumber by the hour. Keep launching.
SOURCE: https://x.com/TABYTCHI/status/2070303825940893922 SOURCE (mirror): https://xcancel.com/TABYTCHI/status/2070303825940893922
Striesland effect in 3, 2, 1âŚ.
I'm all for it... especially in the ol USA
Truth bombs away!
You all need Batmen