"Think about where we stand in time; the mic drop could be closer than anyone realizes. Artificial Intelligence will provide truth."
The goal is that when it's all said and done, there will be no room for question, when it comes to the people. He won't have to disclose shit like 9/11, OKC, Vegas, Voter Fraud, Russia hacks or collusion, elections rigging, etc. specifically. When he's done, it will be a literal "mic drop" on the world's stage and you will no one ever again, will have the ability to question who's responsible for, involved coordinating, etc. ANYTHING that has ever happened and been considered a "conspiracy theory", ever again. When he's done, the entire world will just KNOW IT ALL. It really is THAT all-encompassing. Like Trump says, "you'll see". It just has to happen. We cannot be derailed. Ever again.
For people in the comments who weren't on the boards back then, MegaAnon was a woman, not a man. She predated Q on the boards. She proved herself to be someone in the know more than once. She at first was freaked out by Q posting and said it was fake because of pics from AF1. But a short while later she had figured out Q was NOT fake and she said that on the boards. She never pretended to be part of the Q team. When she had what people call her "freak out" at the end, she wasn't freaking out that Q was fake; she figured out who at least one of them was: Julian Assange. And she was so excited and that showed in her posts. She thanked them for leading her to the knowledge and letting her figure it out instead of spoon feeding her. She had early on in her postings (pre Q) said that Assange was NOT in the embassy. She said that the white hats had gotten him out and she knew that because she had carried Assange's passport in her purse during that operation.
Later on, I stumbled on somebody who theorized who she was. If they're right, she was an NSA cryptography specialist. Here's the X thread:
Color me confused. Twatter sez just over 8 yrs ago before the first Q drop...but my old math pputs the first drop oct 2017 so 9 yrs ago in oct 2026. The way i read mega now lookin back is a frustrated team member cause the LORD KNOWS WHAT I WAS GOIN THRU IN 2017. Tribulation! Then there was fbi anon that ed us to the drops in the vault at the appointed time. Those two alone gave me hope and i was not familiar with tha chans but i was led there thru diggs to watch it unfold in real time. Then the drops started and whatta time to be alive here we are! God uses the lowliest of us to achieve his goals. I for one am grateful to God and the first 2 anons i ever interacted with.
And as i recall 4ch was compromised on more than 1 occasion w tha drops which led to the move to 8ch which also had issues all of it in tha drops which led to 8kun a lotta drama with traveling servers and congressional hearings and dirty bakers showin off their use of Q's secure tripcode. Imo we will get our long awaited qna when tha dust settles.
I seem to recall MegaAnon completely invalidating themselves by having multiple irrational and emotion driven melt downs replying to the Q drops and attacking anons for focusing their attention towards the Q phenomenon.
No idea who this flunky is but he immediately invalidated himself as being aware of Q. QAnon never made any posts because no such entity exists. If this guy knew anything about the Q movement he would know there isn't and never was a QAnon only Q and the anons who research.
No one is arguing against the message or principal behind any Q drop. You're using that as a strawman argument in favor of MegaAnon against a very plebeian source I shared.
Are we to expect the general public to not defaultly refer to Q as Qanon given the fact the MSM campaign (among others) socially engineered the incorrect nomenclature of the Q phenomenon?
Furthermore, the article I shared isn't against the veracity of the Q drops. Solely MegaAnon. By comparison it gives legitimate credence to the Q drops VS MegaAnon posts.
Let's use a completely hypothetical yet similar example: Random pundit puts out an article in favor of Q's legitimacy compared to MegaAnon but incorrectly uses the "Qanon" moniker. So that automatically makes the article null?
When I went to read the purported pre-Q postings the conclusion I formed was that MegaAnon was phony but FBIAnon was legit (but not necessarily of Q lineage).
That is what I recall as well. FBIanon was helping anons dig into clandestine current events the Summer/Fall of 2017.
Every anon that was following the board with fervor at the time should remember as much as well. MegaAnon made it abundantly clear with her responses towards the Q drops and the subsequent ebb & flow of anon interaction that she was ultimately posting for the rushes that come with LARPing fame & following.
Now that I've shared my assessment of the those two, I might as well come out of the closest (or bear den) and say what I really think. This opinion does not sit well with quite a number of respected and long time members of this forum. So here goes. John Titor, the self-claimed time traveler of internet lore, is garbage. Extreme LARP.
I'll be checking back in in 2034 to see how well this ages. Heading back under now to hibernate for eight years.
I also agree with those opinions fren, so know that you're not alone in that corner of the pond.
I'd go a step further in the path you've cleared and say that serialbrain2 is also janky and bogus. Regardless of the one-time very early in their posting "career" that Q quoted him, he used that one-time reference to do the same thing IntheMatrixxx did with their reference... create a paytriot model following.
"Think about where we stand in time; the mic drop could be closer than anyone realizes. Artificial Intelligence will provide truth."
https://nitter.net/DaveFagan16/status/1976129310210785425
This i agree with and whatta mic drop!
For people in the comments who weren't on the boards back then, MegaAnon was a woman, not a man. She predated Q on the boards. She proved herself to be someone in the know more than once. She at first was freaked out by Q posting and said it was fake because of pics from AF1. But a short while later she had figured out Q was NOT fake and she said that on the boards. She never pretended to be part of the Q team. When she had what people call her "freak out" at the end, she wasn't freaking out that Q was fake; she figured out who at least one of them was: Julian Assange. And she was so excited and that showed in her posts. She thanked them for leading her to the knowledge and letting her figure it out instead of spoon feeding her. She had early on in her postings (pre Q) said that Assange was NOT in the embassy. She said that the white hats had gotten him out and she knew that because she had carried Assange's passport in her purse during that operation.
Later on, I stumbled on somebody who theorized who she was. If they're right, she was an NSA cryptography specialist. Here's the X thread:
https://x.com/NSAGov/status/1116774531195183104
👌👍🙏🏻
Color me confused. Twatter sez just over 8 yrs ago before the first Q drop...but my old math pputs the first drop oct 2017 so 9 yrs ago in oct 2026. The way i read mega now lookin back is a frustrated team member cause the LORD KNOWS WHAT I WAS GOIN THRU IN 2017. Tribulation! Then there was fbi anon that ed us to the drops in the vault at the appointed time. Those two alone gave me hope and i was not familiar with tha chans but i was led there thru diggs to watch it unfold in real time. Then the drops started and whatta time to be alive here we are! God uses the lowliest of us to achieve his goals. I for one am grateful to God and the first 2 anons i ever interacted with.
And as i recall 4ch was compromised on more than 1 occasion w tha drops which led to the move to 8ch which also had issues all of it in tha drops which led to 8kun a lotta drama with traveling servers and congressional hearings and dirty bakers showin off their use of Q's secure tripcode. Imo we will get our long awaited qna when tha dust settles.
I seem to recall MegaAnon completely invalidating themselves by having multiple irrational and emotion driven melt downs replying to the Q drops and attacking anons for focusing their attention towards the Q phenomenon.
This article does a service delineating the timeline of MegaAnon posts and highlights how MegaAnon's own quotes tend to invalidate her legitmacy as an insider.
No idea who this flunky is but he immediately invalidated himself as being aware of Q. QAnon never made any posts because no such entity exists. If this guy knew anything about the Q movement he would know there isn't and never was a QAnon only Q and the anons who research.
Totally
Why deflect with the whataboutism regarding proper nomenclature? The article is germane to the veracity of MegaAnon, which is accurate.
Media labeling as 'Qanon' is a method [deliberate] to combine [attach] 'Q' to comments _theories _suggestions _statements [and ACTIONS] made by 2.
u/#q4881
No one is arguing against the message or principal behind any Q drop. You're using that as a strawman argument in favor of MegaAnon against a very plebeian source I shared.
Are we to expect the general public to not defaultly refer to Q as Qanon given the fact the MSM campaign (among others) socially engineered the incorrect nomenclature of the Q phenomenon?
Furthermore, the article I shared isn't against the veracity of the Q drops. Solely MegaAnon. By comparison it gives legitimate credence to the Q drops VS MegaAnon posts.
Let's use a completely hypothetical yet similar example: Random pundit puts out an article in favor of Q's legitimacy compared to MegaAnon but incorrectly uses the "Qanon" moniker. So that automatically makes the article null?
When I went to read the purported pre-Q postings the conclusion I formed was that MegaAnon was phony but FBIAnon was legit (but not necessarily of Q lineage).
That is what I recall as well. FBIanon was helping anons dig into clandestine current events the Summer/Fall of 2017.
Every anon that was following the board with fervor at the time should remember as much as well. MegaAnon made it abundantly clear with her responses towards the Q drops and the subsequent ebb & flow of anon interaction that she was ultimately posting for the rushes that come with LARPing fame & following.
Now that I've shared my assessment of the those two, I might as well come out of the closest (or bear den) and say what I really think. This opinion does not sit well with quite a number of respected and long time members of this forum. So here goes. John Titor, the self-claimed time traveler of internet lore, is garbage. Extreme LARP.
I'll be checking back in in 2034 to see how well this ages. Heading back under now to hibernate for eight years.
I also agree with those opinions fren, so know that you're not alone in that corner of the pond.
I'd go a step further in the path you've cleared and say that serialbrain2 is also janky and bogus. Regardless of the one-time very early in their posting "career" that Q quoted him, he used that one-time reference to do the same thing IntheMatrixxx did with their reference... create a paytriot model following.