The trouble is, pal, I do know what I am talking about. You think you know what you are talking about. There is a difference. I haven't looked at the "official narrative" at all, simply in order to confute that stupid accusation. In fact, I have some doubts about it in the details.
As for conversation, I am too inclined, and am more charitable toward the other party than I should be. Good that we agree. I don't expect to hear from you.
You said in your previous comment that you don't want to continue this conversation. So, why are you continuing it?
My perspective: You might THINK you know what you are talking about, but you DON'T really know what the fuck you are talking about.
You clearly have not looked at a large spectrum of evidence and considered anything but "muh official narrative."
So, we are done with this.
The trouble is, pal, I do know what I am talking about. You think you know what you are talking about. There is a difference. I haven't looked at the "official narrative" at all, simply in order to confute that stupid accusation. In fact, I have some doubts about it in the details.
As for conversation, I am too inclined, and am more charitable toward the other party than I should be. Good that we agree. I don't expect to hear from you.