Please don't take such threads TOO SERIOUSLY. A lot are free association kind of things. Join, join, join facts and concepts whether it makes sense or not. And please, an IQ of 160+ can sometimes be a LIABILITY, think John Nash -- remember in the movie he was in a room with full of associations or lines he drew? THAT IS THE PROBLEM. Not all of this kind of musings can be taken seriously. With enough data, one can make ENDLESS numbers of associations. Please, let's stick with more solid information.
That post reminds me of someone who thought of themselves as some luminary on the old greatawakening board, can't recall the name and don't care to either. Some people thought this person walked on water with is analysis that was really, really out there, like out in the ozone out there. This kind of analysis comes across as deceptive, attention seeking, and very distracting.
The vast majority of Q drops aren't cicada 3301 tests. Yes, they require some thinking and analysis, but we aren't operators folks, we aren't spies or in the intelligence business....we're Americans who are seeing how deep the rabbit hole goes as far as how bad the corruption is by people who were supposed to be on our side.
I get it that some posts are intentionally cryptic to avoid algorithm matching and decoding. Some posts won't and do not mean anything until years in the future at times. Some posts are pure misinformation as well, we aren't the only ones reading them. The posts for the most part are explanatory, and require a bit of knowledge about previous posts, the corresponding research and a bit of imagination for lack of a better term to connect the dots at times.
So, yes I take this one with grain of salt, and that is giving too much validity IMO.
Please don't take such threads TOO SERIOUSLY. A lot are free association kind of things. Join, join, join facts and concepts whether it makes sense or not. And please, an IQ of 160+ can sometimes be a LIABILITY, think John Nash -- remember in the movie he was in a room with full of associations or lines he drew? THAT IS THE PROBLEM. Not all of this kind of musings can be taken seriously. With enough data, one can make ENDLESS numbers of associations. Please, let's stick with more solid information.
That post reminds me of someone who thought of themselves as some luminary on the old greatawakening board, can't recall the name and don't care to either. Some people thought this person walked on water with is analysis that was really, really out there, like out in the ozone out there. This kind of analysis comes across as deceptive, attention seeking, and very distracting.
The vast majority of Q drops aren't cicada 3301 tests. Yes, they require some thinking and analysis, but we aren't operators folks, we aren't spies or in the intelligence business....we're Americans who are seeing how deep the rabbit hole goes as far as how bad the corruption is by people who were supposed to be on our side.
I get it that some posts are intentionally cryptic to avoid algorithm matching and decoding. Some posts won't and do not mean anything until years in the future at times. Some posts are pure misinformation as well, we aren't the only ones reading them. The posts for the most part are explanatory, and require a bit of knowledge about previous posts, the corresponding research and a bit of imagination for lack of a better term to connect the dots at times.
So, yes I take this one with grain of salt, and that is giving too much validity IMO.