Also Catherine Herridge, John Solomon, both whom Q has referenced multiple times. I suspect they have been briefed on something, enough to make them cooperate. The notion that all four will betray The People without blinking an eye is highly improbable, so whatever they were clued in, it had to be really good stuff. Also, Sidney Powell is in the loop too. But any intel op will be appropriately compartmentalized, so I guess they can be called assets.
Sean is so repetitive that I find it hard to tolorate his show anymore. I think he too is provided inside knowledge, but unlike Tucker, he rarely sways from the same data he pounds-in his dialog and show every night.
There is a purpose in this though. I agree he's repetitive, but so is the MSM - its a strategy/tactic. I have to admit I find myself saying some of his repeated catchphrases sometimes. "Exoneration before investigation". "Premeditated fraud before a FISA court". "Creepy, Sleepy Crazy Joe 30330". He's like the end of the day refresher after Tucker. They just have different purposes. Tucker spreads the truth, Hannity makes sure you don't forget it.
The way I'd put it, is that its impossible to hold the positions they do and be unaware of the substance of Q, the correlations are simply too strong to be anything other than backed by design.
So followers for sure, assets is a harder question since that's a card that has to be played very close out of necessity for the safety of those concerned. Tuckers home has already been sieged by leftists and his family threatened. And that was in more peaceful times. Now?
8kun is getting ddosed, their domain is threatened to be stolen pretty relentlessly, qmap and its author have been doxed and threatened, and big names all over the socials are being attacked and deplatformed.
A rat driven by panic and by being cornered will still lash out and snap, and who wants those diseased filthy little fangs anywhere near their body?
I have a feeling there are more than a couple of twitter accounts that have some sort of access, based on the day before or hard to find yet publicly accessible information.
Also Catherine Herridge, John Solomon, both whom Q has referenced multiple times. I suspect they have been briefed on something, enough to make them cooperate. The notion that all four will betray The People without blinking an eye is highly improbable, so whatever they were clued in, it had to be really good stuff. Also, Sidney Powell is in the loop too. But any intel op will be appropriately compartmentalized, so I guess they can be called assets.
Definitely Herridge. I was pissed when she left Fox, but I see why now. She was part of the dissemination effort.
What about Hannity?
Sean is so repetitive that I find it hard to tolorate his show anymore. I think he too is provided inside knowledge, but unlike Tucker, he rarely sways from the same data he pounds-in his dialog and show every night.
There is a purpose in this though. I agree he's repetitive, but so is the MSM - its a strategy/tactic. I have to admit I find myself saying some of his repeated catchphrases sometimes. "Exoneration before investigation". "Premeditated fraud before a FISA court". "Creepy, Sleepy Crazy Joe 30330". He's like the end of the day refresher after Tucker. They just have different purposes. Tucker spreads the truth, Hannity makes sure you don't forget it.
I don't listen to Hannity unless I have to. Gonna miss Rush, who repeats as well, but somehow Rush is better at repeat.
exactly Fox isn't Fox anymore.
Hannity has always been all bark and no bite.
The way I'd put it, is that its impossible to hold the positions they do and be unaware of the substance of Q, the correlations are simply too strong to be anything other than backed by design.
So followers for sure, assets is a harder question since that's a card that has to be played very close out of necessity for the safety of those concerned. Tuckers home has already been sieged by leftists and his family threatened. And that was in more peaceful times. Now?
8kun is getting ddosed, their domain is threatened to be stolen pretty relentlessly, qmap and its author have been doxed and threatened, and big names all over the socials are being attacked and deplatformed.
A rat driven by panic and by being cornered will still lash out and snap, and who wants those diseased filthy little fangs anywhere near their body?
I have a feeling there are more than a couple of twitter accounts that have some sort of access, based on the day before or hard to find yet publicly accessible information.
Their lack of engagement with the topic speaks volumes.
My personal fantasy pick for behind the scenes involvement somehow is Dan Carlin.
Lol no.