Do you honestly think that you know more about Chris Wray than PDT?
If your observation that Director Wray is no good is a correct assessment, what are the options?
a. PDT is oblivious to Wray's treachery.
b. PDT is aware of Wray's treachery but does not have the ability to do anything about it or is too fearful to do anything (the situation is out of his control).
c. PDT is aware of Wray's treachery and has not done anything (that we can see) about it yet but will act when he knows that the time is right (the situation is under control).
Are there any other options? Why would you think that a or b were correct?
Everything Q posts isn't gospel, going to happen, or scheduled. Q has said many, many times there will be a lot of disinformation he posts as MANY others see the Q team writes. A nudge in the right direction to research is one thing, calendar predictions, or things of that nature are something else entirely.
Completely agree. Everyone on both sides sees the post, the posts are public. Wray may be useful as a placeholder, to keep the conspirators on the other side occupied. After all, Q let the Mueller show do its worst, to let them trap themselves. The timing lies with Q, hence Q has the initiative. Everyone else has to predict or react.
You guys do realize that Q stated removal of Wray is a future marker/ time stamp right? So he has verified that Wray was a sleeper cell and now is going to be removed when the time is right.
Also have to ask for this one - sounds like a good future proves past case if it exists. I've done some searching and haven't found this reference.
Not much mention on 'Wray' since early to mid-2018. For what my opinion is worth on the topic, there have been 'TRUST WRAY' posts dating from this 2018 period and earlier, and I think Q was wrong in saying this. Certainly there is much stronger case on him being a sleeper than not, based on the new things we have learned between now and then. Also it doesn't look like disinfo to me. I might entirely be wrong on that, but telling people to trust a compromised person could be utterly ruinous to the rule of law when said person heads the FBI.. too big a reach.
Q is not infallible. Perhaps Wray was compromised between then and now, but that's one hell of a dice for the swamp monsters to roll if so, cause he could have just dropped all comms on the desk of POTUS and said 'Go get em tiger!' and things would be vastly further along the road of prosecutions than we are now. So I think Wray has always been bad.. not great to contemplate but you dont go to war with the army you wish you had, only the army you have. The roseinstein/ strzok hearings didn't have him looking good at all.
Theres a hell of a lot to break down in that post and most of it way outside my area.
I'm not so sure about your conclusion on Sessions, I think he was a man cornered in a room full of mousetraps as soon as he was appointed AG.. and his task was to clean the place out. If you are criminals, and the dems and a large number of repubs surely were, where better to infiltrate, sabotage and boobytrap the most than the office of the top cop in the country?
Notably one of the few that took a hard line against pedo Joe when his fingers went wandering towards the children. That's worth a lot given that most seemed too intimidated to intervene.
If you wanna make some other posts going over items above for folks here in more detail that would be great, but its up to you.. lots going on to keep track of, especially now as things are heating up.
Do you honestly think that you know more about Chris Wray than PDT?
If your observation that Director Wray is no good is a correct assessment, what are the options?
a. PDT is oblivious to Wray's treachery.
b. PDT is aware of Wray's treachery but does not have the ability to do anything about it or is too fearful to do anything (the situation is out of his control).
c. PDT is aware of Wray's treachery and has not done anything (that we can see) about it yet but will act when he knows that the time is right (the situation is under control).
Are there any other options? Why would you think that a or b were correct?
Q needs to explain the, "Trust Wray," post.
Everything Q posts isn't gospel, going to happen, or scheduled. Q has said many, many times there will be a lot of disinformation he posts as MANY others see the Q team writes. A nudge in the right direction to research is one thing, calendar predictions, or things of that nature are something else entirely.
Completely agree. Everyone on both sides sees the post, the posts are public. Wray may be useful as a placeholder, to keep the conspirators on the other side occupied. After all, Q let the Mueller show do its worst, to let them trap themselves. The timing lies with Q, hence Q has the initiative. Everyone else has to predict or react.
You guys do realize that Q stated removal of Wray is a future marker/ time stamp right? So he has verified that Wray was a sleeper cell and now is going to be removed when the time is right.
Sauce?
Also have to ask for this one - sounds like a good future proves past case if it exists. I've done some searching and haven't found this reference.
Not much mention on 'Wray' since early to mid-2018. For what my opinion is worth on the topic, there have been 'TRUST WRAY' posts dating from this 2018 period and earlier, and I think Q was wrong in saying this. Certainly there is much stronger case on him being a sleeper than not, based on the new things we have learned between now and then. Also it doesn't look like disinfo to me. I might entirely be wrong on that, but telling people to trust a compromised person could be utterly ruinous to the rule of law when said person heads the FBI.. too big a reach.
Q is not infallible. Perhaps Wray was compromised between then and now, but that's one hell of a dice for the swamp monsters to roll if so, cause he could have just dropped all comms on the desk of POTUS and said 'Go get em tiger!' and things would be vastly further along the road of prosecutions than we are now. So I think Wray has always been bad.. not great to contemplate but you dont go to war with the army you wish you had, only the army you have. The roseinstein/ strzok hearings didn't have him looking good at all.
Theres a hell of a lot to break down in that post and most of it way outside my area.
I'm not so sure about your conclusion on Sessions, I think he was a man cornered in a room full of mousetraps as soon as he was appointed AG.. and his task was to clean the place out. If you are criminals, and the dems and a large number of repubs surely were, where better to infiltrate, sabotage and boobytrap the most than the office of the top cop in the country?
Notably one of the few that took a hard line against pedo Joe when his fingers went wandering towards the children. That's worth a lot given that most seemed too intimidated to intervene.
If you wanna make some other posts going over items above for folks here in more detail that would be great, but its up to you.. lots going on to keep track of, especially now as things are heating up.
It was a post in July 2019. Post # 3537. https://qanon.pub/?q=Future
Thx for the link - it got a shoutout by PrayingMedic today with the news that Wray is done.. which is great news!
https://twitter.com/prayingmedic/status/1307014159658135552
Trump says Wrays testimony on antifa bothered him: https://youtu.be/hqrerTmExFc
Or you can just think for yourself. This isn't about following a dogma.
Looks like it finally will be coming https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-fbi-christopher-wray-replaced-antifa-russia-china