Social media makes it incredibly easy for people to share things under almost any medium.
Chelsea Clinton, for example, has appeared on camera with HRC, or at least her replacement, as recently as this year. If she’s part of the cult, why not blab on Twitter or IG or wherever she chooses to let people know that her mother was arrested to take away the leverage from the white hats? The fact that she doesn’t makes no sense from what you’re saying.
HRC was also pictured at a restaurant with bill and others. Why wouldn’t any of them blab to take power away from white hats?
Personally I like to do research to make sure I’m not just believing in fairy tales or whatever someone else is telling me but that’s just me. What you’ve suggested doesn’t really make sense logically.
Right but you said that if people know HRC is arrested then the white hats lose leverage. If so, it would be advantageous for the luciferean cult to let the public know that HRC was arrested. So, there is a flaw somewhere in the logic of events that you’ve shared.
Well you and another user seem to disagree, and that HRC is currently behind bars. There’s a lot of inconsistency here
Sure but after the camera stops rolling, these actors are seen behind the scenes, in public, walking around, socializing with others. In order to believe that this is some double or actress, you’d have to also believe that those close to her are willing to keep this a secret as well. The actress’ real life family and friends as well
Logically, it doesn’t work out.
Well I’m trying to look at it logically. If there’s a second person pretending to be Hillary, is she doing it full time? Does she have a life outside of this or is she just Hillary now all the time?
If the white hats need to to be kept quiet, why wouldn’t bill or Chelsea or anyone else close to them blab?
Who is the actress? What was she doing before this? Did she just grow up dormant until her time came? Or did she leave behind an old life?
But why have a double if she was arrested? Wouldn’t the group who arrested her want others to know?
What about her family and friends? Colleagues? Interns? Are they all in on it?
So where is that Hillary now then?
Right and the version you wrote doesn’t flow or rhyme. The rhyme structure of this is AABBA, meaning the third and fourth lines have to rhyme.
“Through,” or “go through,” doesn’t rhyme with “dildo.”
“Will go” does.
You also have an awkward number of syllables (15) that makes the flow stutter on the line change
Also if you have to think that hard about not saying “go through” without a pause then I think you might need to go back to school…
It doesn’t, because it doesn’t rhyme and there’s an uneven number of syllables on each line, so the meter is going to be wrong.
It’s also not hard to say the words “go through” with a pause. That’s a silly excuse
Through doesn’t rhyme with dildo in this version. The ends of the lines need to rhyme.
Meter wise it also doesn’t work at all
In the original, “will go” rhymes with “dildo”
No the meter is right in the current version.
E-ven if the ur-ine will go (8) Through a flesh-y sort of dil-do (8)
Just because I don’t believe what you say without evidence? You expect me to just say “oh well you said you saw it so it must be true.” How do I know you aren’t lying?
You haven’t even tried to convince me. You’ve just said that you saw it.
The Mandela effect means that you’re remembering something that didn’t actually exist, so yes I would agree.
If what you’re saying is true you would need proof of it rather than just saying “I’ve seen it.” That’s not going to be enough to convince anyone.
Okay well I know you are wrong because it hasn’t been in the airport since the 90’s, and I’ve been in the airport several times in 2018 and it wasn’t there.
Sorry, double Biden? If you’re under the assumption that the man currently giving speeches is somehow a clone then I’ve got a bridge to sell you.
This site doesn’t do itself any favors by promoting that science fiction.
No it hasn’t. The artwork with the masks was made in 2020
People really need to research things before posting them
On the spotline?
Have you don’t any digging into the clones or do you just believe anything some tells you?
Well it’s pretty certain clones aren’t being used since nobody has ever seen one. What are the reliable sources that 100% claim there are? Because they don’t seem reliable if that’s what they’re claiming.
Body doubles I’ve always agreed with. When people initially said body doubles I thought they meant clones.
Jesus Chris man.
This is still shots from a security camera. It’s not like he interacted with people and they thought he was a white guy. They looked at grainy security camera footage, which with mild scrutiny can be seen is fake.
What you’re suggesting is a person in front of high definition news cameras, photographers, talking with people and answering questions. If you think the step from Halloween mask to THAT level of sophistication is that small that it takes a couple billion dollars of research that NOBODY else even comes close to replicating you really don’t know anything about manufacturing.
If this technology exists, there would be a middle ground between a goddamn rubber Halloween mask and mission impossible face swaps. Rejected patents would become commercial products. Rich people would have a version of this that’s good-not-great.
We’re not there yet man. I get that it sounds cool but it’s not real.
Bud, no. Military tech is certainly going to me more sophisticated in some aspects but to believe they’re making realistic masks people wear over their face is silly.
Don’t just believe something just cause it sounds cool. Do research.
Well I guess first my question would be what do you mean when they shoved a double out? At what point did this happen?