2
Afropick07 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah, we can easily prove its round though, so why entertain what is trivial to your everyday life.

2
Afropick07 2 points ago +2 / -0

Why particularly polaris? Directions matter too, so what if the constellations are moving in the same direction similar speed? Then the 500,000 mph wouldnt really matter. What would change the sky is great relative speeds and different directions.

1
Afropick07 1 point ago +1 / -0

The force of gravity doesnt work like that. Thats like saying Jupiter orbits around one of its moons.

1
Afropick07 1 point ago +1 / -0

All that proves is dont trust your eyes. Sure but you can trust tests. Got any?

2
Afropick07 2 points ago +2 / -0

They might lie about the globe. I dont blindly trust anything. I like to test things. Do you have any tests that you or I could do to prove flat earth? Cause I have some for globe earth.

2
Afropick07 2 points ago +2 / -0

When you consider the great distances things are away, it makes sense that they wouldnt noticeably move. The planets definitely move though.

3
Afropick07 3 points ago +3 / -0

Give me a test that youve done to prove it. Watching videos isnt considered research btw.

1
Afropick07 1 point ago +1 / -0

Youre saying that math exists that shows the sun could revolve around that earth?

1
Afropick07 1 point ago +1 / -0

Okay, also if for one observer the sun is directly overhead, to someone 3000 miles away it would have to be 45 degrees above the horizon. Are you good with that?

1
Afropick07 1 point ago +1 / -0

Those rays are actually almost parallel.

I love math! So, the angular measurement of the sun is 0.5334 degrees, and if the sun is only 3000 miles away, tan(0.5334)*3000= 27.9. The sun is only 28 miles across? Is that what you believe?

2
Afropick07 2 points ago +2 / -0

Correct. I can chose what to believe. I dont let them force me one way or the other.

2
Afropick07 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thats called perspective. Those light rays are actually almost parallel but due to perspective we all learned in art class, they appear to converge.

Now take this knowledge about perspective and apply it to the size of the sun. Namely that it doesnt change size throughout the day. A FE would have you believe that its distance to grts shorter til high noon and then further until it sets.

4
Afropick07 4 points ago +4 / -0

Except then lunar eclipses dont make sense. Next one on May 15th. Check it out!

17
Afropick07 17 points ago +17 / -0

Another one:

Dont dumb down language based on the color of the skin of the person youre talking to.

Theres a hilarious study on this that shows liberal white people think black people are dumb.

2
Afropick07 2 points ago +2 / -0

Haha hopefully your style has improved beyond college. Im sure I got prejudged when I wore white Tees and baggy jeans. Then I mightve needed a college jacket. I think it would give me no advantage anymore.

2
Afropick07 2 points ago +2 / -0

I wouldnt say its cocky. Its just supports all observations. If all the math lines up, and all experience lines up, and predictions can be made, tested, and verified, Id say its pretty locked down.

Coming up May 15 will be a lunar eclipse. Check it out. Predictable. Observable. Cool. Unexplainable by flat earth models.

3
Afropick07 3 points ago +3 / -0

They would say that youre really turning slightly, so slightly that you wouldnt notice it. They would then say that because planes dont dip their nose down, that that is proof the earth isnt round, which theyre obviously wrong about.

Its the same argument with the same flaw.

14
Afropick07 14 points ago +14 / -0

Haha narrative…i presented a test. You ignored that. Which reinforces my first point, flat earthers dont like tests.

8
Afropick07 8 points ago +11 / -3

Amusing until they try to tie FE to the Bible. They cherry pick a couple verses, take things out of context, or take things literally that were meant symbolically or metaphorically. It just makes christians look bad, but maybe thats their goal.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›