3
Allergic_to_Blueshit 3 points ago +3 / -0

*sigh.

Looking at this list...what a long wear this has been.😓

Man, these names...all the crap...Damn.

Talk about a trip down F'd up memory lane.

1
Allergic_to_Blueshit 1 point ago +1 / -0

...indesting...

Also, I don't mean to complain but...this is a loooong movie. I'm running out of popcorn.

1
Allergic_to_Blueshit 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hey! Don't speak that on yourself! Caution is always good practice. And, if I can't see it fully via the imperfect medium of the interwebs, I apologize! But to me* you image looks legit from what I see.

When I zoomed into the edges of some of the pen strokes it looked like I could see ink spreading (like like imagine a watercolor and you see the watercolor paint blotching out in almost like a cloud like pattern. If I zoom in on your image to the edges of some letters I can see it blooming out that same way... I don't think a xerox machine would capture that without it being a hard edge, but again I could be wrong!)

You're fully right to make sure that you are not being ripped off!

2
Allergic_to_Blueshit 2 points ago +2 / -0

What glitch... This looks like sharpie streaks....

It doesn't look pixilated or streaky like a misprint, that looks like a marker on paper...

So, for example, your photo of the full sig is not the duplicative copy of the signature here: https://godblesstheusabible.com/products/president-donald-j-trump-signature-edition-god-bless-the-usa-bible

This to gas marker streaks, look at the inside bottom line of the D, for example.

But also, yours is not a photocopy of this signature...not in the character of the pen stroke not in placement of the signature...yours is very close to the printed text.

What glitch are you seeing? Can you circle it?

2
Allergic_to_Blueshit 2 points ago +2 / -0

No worries. I understand... I'd be pissed to... Yet, at the same time...having worked with inks in contracts and as an artist it can sometimes look like it is fake. It is totally better to make and see if it is fake or not!

1
Allergic_to_Blueshit 1 point ago +1 / -0

I am just trying to understand the situation... I'm not defending anything, so chill.

Ok, so having not seen one irl, I can't say if it is a xerox or not. Why do you say it is a photocopy and not a hand-signed signature.

Did you do and ink test? ...how is it being identified as a photocopy? https://www.quora.com/Could-you-and-how-would-you-be-able-to-tell-the-difference-between-printer-ink-and-an-original-ink-signature

2
Allergic_to_Blueshit 2 points ago +2 / -0

Can someone once clarify for me what is fake? I am seriously asking because it doesn't seem to be stated. Is it not the King James Bible? Does it not actually have them Constitution, Bill of Rights, and Pledge of Allegiance? Is it not the same signature as Trump's? I do think that 1000$ is steep for a signature, but not an autograph. And the language advertised on the website says 'signature' and not 'autograph'...

" A "signature" is simply your handwritten name used to legally authenticate a document, while an "autograph" is specifically a famous person's handwritten signature, often given to a fan as a personal souvenir; essentially, an autograph is a type of signature from someone well-known, whereas a signature is just your standard written name for legal purposes."

So a photograph of a signature as still a signature but it isn't an autograph.

So, what is the scam? I'm not sure what is being called out here...

In this video Trump says he endorses this Bible: https://youtu.be/noezEB6BKno?si=mOcVCOk-hdHKr7Us

0
Allergic_to_Blueshit 0 points ago +1 / -1

Mmmm....it is more of a generational thing than a lib thing.

1
Allergic_to_Blueshit 1 point ago +1 / -0

...wow...those tweets are so unhinged I can't even decipher them.

1
Allergic_to_Blueshit 1 point ago +1 / -0

Careful here. There is the Smith-Mundt that could/would ideally be overturned. Smithmont is what allows the media to lie to American citizens via Obama. I think that podcasters and influencers and Independent Media need to be kept clear from mainstream media National media those that need to be beholden to an oath.

What I don't want to happen is podcasters etc etc being liable for "misinformation disinformation" opponent opinions whereas I do want National media news to be liable for misinformation lies and to blatantly State when they are saying opinion rather than fact. For example, Trump is a fascist is an opinion it is not fact where it's making people think that it's fact because it's on the news

1
Allergic_to_Blueshit 1 point ago +1 / -0

Blanketly I say, I don't like blanket statements. It depends on how it's done. It depends on how it's covered parentheses we know it will be covered in a very derogatory way.)

I think that if they see them going after gangs that is a different presentation then if they see Grandma's being loaded up by the army.

But let's also not forget, it's not only the army. It would also be police, ice officials, and probably for the most violent the army. I'd also say it's probably going to be Democratic mayors that will try and lock down their City and what I'm more worried about is US police forces being strong armed or compelled to resist our American soldiers that is going to be an epic sh1t show if that were to happen.

3
Allergic_to_Blueshit 3 points ago +3 / -0

🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥

view more: Next ›