2
AnonWasTaken 2 points ago +2 / -0

Is this just speculation or is there actually sauce for this

1
AnonWasTaken 1 point ago +1 / -0

In a normal world, I would say the insanity would end sooner under Trump. But for all we know, Biden being in office could be necessary for the military to expose the cabal. To me, it seems more intuitive that trump would only be reinstated after the cabal has mostly/completely fallen.

So I guess my original line of thought was more like: Trump coming back in 2024 doesn't necessarily mean things won't get immensely better before then, and people shouldn't panic too much at the idea. Rather, they should panic at the idea that Trump won't be back before 2024, AND things won't get immensely better.

1
AnonWasTaken 1 point ago +1 / -0

I do really, really want trump. But if the truth gets exposed and the general insanity ends, then having him back is really just a cherry on top.

0
AnonWasTaken 0 points ago +1 / -1

Yeah but I'd be willing to wait an extra year (for some arbitrary reason) if it meant the covid insanity ended and normies woke up to it.

We just tend to associate trump coming back with other positive things happening.

6
AnonWasTaken 6 points ago +6 / -0

Actually I'm starting to think he might have just said that because it rhymes

-5
AnonWasTaken -5 points ago +3 / -8

Kind of unrelated, and not that I don't want him back sooner, but i just wanna remind y'all that having trump back probably isn't exactly what you want. What you really want is a return to sanity, the end of corona bullshit, and some justice. If this happens, It's really not so important that trump comes back. We associate trump with sanity so we want him back, but what we really want is the sanity, not trump.

2
AnonWasTaken 2 points ago +2 / -0

It also isn't necessary to have this level of an audit in every single state in order to reverse the election.

by BQnita
1
AnonWasTaken 1 point ago +1 / -0

I suppose you could argue that the Biden presidency is an illusionary counter-counter-coup, which is actually part of the plan of the first counter-coup

by BQnita
5
AnonWasTaken 5 points ago +7 / -2

We are not in the first stages of a coup. The coup was finished a long time ago. But Trump, Q, and the Great Awakening are a part of a counter-coup to rescue the country.

4
AnonWasTaken 4 points ago +4 / -0

But also, the remaining boxes can only contain so many ballots. 200,000 might assume that the remaining boxes aren't missing any ballots (in other words it would be impossible to make up the 200,000 with only the remaining boxes).

1
AnonWasTaken 1 point ago +1 / -0

You are missing the point. I never said that these people shouldn't be executed. My point is that people shouldn't be celebrating the execution of criminals. The death is not the positive aspect of justice.

2
AnonWasTaken 2 points ago +2 / -0

The idea that marriage can be legal or illegal also doesn't even make sense to begin with. Marriage is not the business of government.

1
AnonWasTaken 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is very true. But I find that people on this site (maybe not you) get too excited about putting people to death, and they lose the fact that the positive part of justice is not the aspect of revenge. I am more than ready to have these genocidal idiots reprimanded, but their deaths are not exactly what we should be celebrating. It is misguided emotional thinking and a bad attitude to have with things as serious as these.

0
AnonWasTaken 0 points ago +1 / -1

I never said there shouldn't be consequences or that death is a bad penalty. I was just trying to say that it's not really something that we should be "happy" about doing.

-3
AnonWasTaken -3 points ago +2 / -5

I think yall need to remember that this kind of stuff isn't really a positive thing. Executing criminals may be the "right" thing to do, but keep in mind, it's really shitty.

This sucks. It's really sad. Even if they deserve it and it is the best course of action, it's still terrible. It isn't really the kind of thing to be celebrated.

0
AnonWasTaken 0 points ago +1 / -1

Yeah my post kind of assumes that the system isn't rigged. But at the same time if the system is rigged enough that we can't vote out a candidate then there's no way we are going to get legislation passed to kick out that same candidate for being old.

1
AnonWasTaken 1 point ago +2 / -1

"We should force politicians to retire at 65" by not voting for them. Would be silly to actually pass a law for this.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›