To be fair, I would not trust them to put the blame on China for long.
Everything they have, the worst of our people helps them with.
Nothing can stop what is coming. From a fren of a fren.
More like https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a664GwFPV7A
From a fren of a fren.
Mmmm, you missed a part. They determined it's 1:20,000 and not 1:100,000. That's quite a leap, is it not?
Read the article further, and you'll see:
The researchers wrote: “At this stage, according to preliminary findings, which need further corroboration, there is an impression of a higher number than expected, especially for ages up to the age of 30. A more advanced report on the subject will be prepared soon.”
“The impression is that there is an increase in the incidence of the phenomenon especially in young men on the scale of 1:20,000 after vaccination,” they added. “It is likely that the onset of myocarditis is associated with receiving the vaccine (especially the second dose).”
Recognize this - the researchers believe (A) the real number is not only higher than expected, but 80% higher than this article led with.
You understand the downplaying mechanics going on here when the article says, About one in 100,000 people who received the Pfizer coronavirus vaccine suffered from myocarditis – an inflammation of the heart muscle – a preliminary report redacted by the committee of experts tasked by the Health Ministry to monitor the inoculation’s side effect has found, Channel 12 reported on Friday. Keyword: Redacted.
Just putting it all on the table for you. 1/20k roughly translates to how many Americans? Now consider that 1:20,000 might also be too small a number. This is the Pfizer vaccine alone, we're talking about - it has been pretty clear for a time now that the Moderna and J&J were bad enough to recall at points.
From @RealGenFlynn May 22nd; double unfinished back to back.
President Donald J. Trump did so much for this country because he loved (and loves) America. Trump never once had, not even one whistleblower on his side (and very few republicans to boot!
Even the people you think were on his side, weren't. The bureaucrats were, for the most part, weak people and worked against him at every
Did you know General Flynn is a stickler for proper punctuation?
Did you know General Flynn takes this channel seriously enough to release a voice clip verifying it's his?
Did you "learn the comms" as ordered?
Mistakes to you are roadmaps to others.
(1) It's from https://t.me/s/RealGenFlynn which is legitimate. Scroll up to his May 14 voice recording if you need more proof than my word (which is good).
(2) It's an image post - meaning non-textual. This evades "find" function and requires image identification.
"A few weeks ago, over 300 million lottery tickets where sold in 4 days. Within hours of the drawing, lottery officials how many winning tickets were sold and where the winning tickets were sold, down to the specific store locations."
Flynn either (A) reposted image-text from someone with whom he agrees with the general statement of, in spite of this minor Freudian slip "where" which foreshadows the remainder of the paragraph's point - or (B) it's his work and it's cryptic. The "where" is specific and "4" is a marker. 4 days of overselling, 1 day of drawing, 300 million people. Maybe it's 1 down, 4 to go, for 300?
Lastly, Gen. Flynn is a stickler for punctuation outside of lists, quotes, and lines followed by emojis used in place of a proper .
Mistakes to you are roadmaps to others.
Someone had too much fun with that customer classification model...
Well, the world is free - the bad people just have to be removed from it for it to remain that way.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuremberg_principles
Principle I
Any person who commits an act which constitutes a crime under international law is responsible therefor and liable to punishment.
Principle II
The fact that internal law does not impose a penalty for an act which constitutes a crime under international law does not relieve the person who committed the act from responsibility under international law.
Principle III
The fact that a person who committed an act which constitutes a crime under international law, acted as Head of State or responsible government official, does not relieve him from responsibility under international law.
Principle IV
The fact that a person acted pursuant to order of his Government or of a superior does not relieve him from responsibility under international law, provided a moral choice was in fact possible to him.
This principle could be paraphrased as follows: "It is not an acceptable excuse to say 'I was just following my superior's orders'".
Previous to the time of the Nuremberg Trials, this excuse was known in common parlance as "superior orders".[citation needed] After the prominent, high-profile event of the Nuremberg Trials, that excuse is now referred to by many as the "Nuremberg Defense". In recent times, a third term, "lawful orders" has become common parlance for some people.[citation needed] All three terms are in use today, and they all have slightly different nuances of meaning, depending on the context in which they are used.
Nuremberg Principle IV is legally supported by the jurisprudence found in certain articles in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights which deal indirectly with conscientious objection.[citation needed] It is also supported by the principles found in paragraph 171 of the Handbook on Procedures and Criteria for Determining Refugee Status which was issued by the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). Those principles deal with the conditions under which conscientious objectors can apply for refugee status in another country if they face persecution in their own country for refusing to participate in an illegal war.
Principle V
Any person charged with a crime under international law has the right to a fair trial on the facts and law.
Principle VI
The crimes hereinafter set out are punishable as crimes under international law:
(a) Crimes against peace:
(i) Planning, preparation, initiation or waging of a war of aggression or a war in violation of international treaties, agreements or assurances;
(ii) Participation in a common plan or conspiracy for the accomplishment of any of the acts mentioned under (i).
(b) War crimes: Violations of the laws or customs of war which include, but are not limited to, murder, ill-treatment or deportation to slave labor or for any other purpose of civilian population of or in occupied territory; murder or ill-treatment of prisoners of war or persons on the Seas, killing of hostages, plunder of public or private property, wanton destruction of cities, towns, or villages, or devastation not justified by military necessity.
(c) Crimes against humanity: Murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation and other inhumane acts done against any civilian population, or persecutions on political, racial, or religious grounds, when such acts are done or such persecutions are carried on in execution of or in connection with any crime against peace or any war crime. Leaders, organizers, instigators and accomplices participating in the formulation or execution of a common plan or conspiracy to commit any of the foregoing crimes are responsible for all acts performed by any persons in execution of such plan.
Principle VII Complicity in the commission of a crime against peace, a war crime, or a crime against humanity as set forth in Principle VI is a crime under international law.
Remember, this isn't just about saving the United States. It's about saving the world. In order for a global-scale war crime to be prosecuted, a global-scale war crime has to be caught dead to rights - along with everyone involved in committing it (see Principle IV).
For governments to hold corporations - themselves as powerful as governments - accountable, "you gotta catch them all!"
Magnets, lol.
Solution to everything.
Oh. By the way. Increase your intake of potassium. https://www.drugs.com/potassium.html
2 or 3 Bananas a day should help you. Remember, moderation.
Patience has never been harder.
Knowing exactly what you're up against, and knowing there is nothing you, personally, can do within your ability to break that power structure is the greatest burden #DigitalSoldiers carry.
The [DS] is working overtime. These are their final gasps. It's like watching a rapist die peacefully - a precipice before judgement.
I am aware that the COVID protein is vascular. Thus it causes problems within the blood stream and the systems of that circulatory system. There are reports of heavy bleeding by other women who have not taken the Shot by being nearby those who have (Shedding or transmitting).
Also - offset ovulations and lengthened cycles lasting 60 days before next period occurs. Think "pheremones." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vomer
Why does a woman typically follow the menstrual cycle of the women around her? Why do women typically have periods at the same time as their peers? Pheremones.
So If people who are VaXXed are shedding synthetic proteins can they cause another person to develop heart issues?
Think "pheremones." For a basic idea, Stargate SG-1 Season 1 Episode 19; "One False Step" and while watching, replace "infrasound/infrasonic" with "pheromones" as the concept of reference in the show, and it makes far more sense.
Just wondering bc although I am not VaXXed I have been around some who have been and now have an irregular heart beat which I have not seen on an ECG before. My last one was done in 2019 and was normal. 2 weeks ago I had an abnormal one. I am seeing a Cardiologist this week to find out more information. There can be any number of reasons for this including hereditary since my mom had it when she got older.
Think sudden reignition of Palestine conflict by bad actors in Palestine and Israel [DS].
Consider epigenetics as a concept. Consider mRNA, and whether or not foreign mRNA injection can interfere with domestic mRNA. Exposure to vaccine recipients + Epigenetic change in vaccine recipients + pheromonal shedding from vaccine recipients = situation.
Although I am pushing 70 I know this could be happening for many other reasons, but I am now wondering if somehow I may have contracted COVID (I never was sick that I know of last year) and/or somehow I had a person shed their proteins on me.
Covid is more like a marketing tool for the vaccine.
#4306
How do you convince people a vaccine is necessary [critical]? ... Q
https://aspe.hhs.gov/cdc-%E2%80%94-influenza-deaths-request-correction-rfc
At the 2004 "National Influenza Vaccine Summit," co-sponsored by CDC and the American Medical Association, Glen Nowak, associate director for communications at the NIP, spoke on using the media to boost demand for the vaccine. One step of a "Seven-Step `Recipe' for Generating Interest in, and Demand for, Flu (or any other) Vaccination" occurs when "medical experts and public health authorities publicly...state concern and alarm (and predict dire outcomes)—and urge influenza vaccination" (www.ama-assn.org/ama1/pub/upload/mm/36/2004_flu_nowak.pdf //Link defunct, alternative here: https://www.scribd.com/document/19212191/2004-flu-nowak). Another step entails "continued reports...that influenza is causing severe illness and/or affecting lots of people, helping foster the perception that many people are susceptible to a bad case of influenza." Preceding the summit, demand had been low early into the 2003 flu season. "At that point, the manufacturers were telling us that they weren't receiving a lot of orders for vaccine for use in November or even December," recalled Dr Nowak on National Public Radio. "It really did look like we needed to do something to encourage people to get a flu shot." If flu is in fact not a major cause of death, this public relations approach is surely exaggerated. Moreover, by arbitrarily linking flu with pneumonia, current data are statistically biased. Until corrected and until unbiased statistics are developed, the chances for sound discussion and public health policy are limited.
Realize the amount of marketing that goes into the covid vaccination. Act to counteract. You walk away from this conversation knowing more than you did earlier.
Think smaller. Like a conical pebble.
What is Durham?
Define "Circus."
A tent full of clowns, there for your entertainment.
6 Corporations own 90% of our media.
Universities are puppets of Corporations, used to indoctrinate students who aspire to be puppets of Corporations.
Marxism is a whipping boy. Easy bad guy to rally against, easy bad guy to claim is our problem.
Count the number of times Q references "Marx."
What is another name for/ interpretation of Fascism/Nazism?
Corporatism. Is China Marxist? Or Corporatist.
Crenshaw's whipping the drug dealer, when the pharmaceutical company is the one responsible for it all. To be expected.
Clowns are here for our entertainment.
The viewing of online pornography is incompatible with being a good Qtard IMO. Q made it clear that this is all a matter of faith.
Very good at your job.
Note - I'm not your downvoter.
Simplification - you have a cage trap for a specific animal.
In the trap, you've placed bait (food) and you're going to put a radio collar on the target animal (a bobcat). Likelihood that you'll catch your target: ~<36%. Likelihood that something else might take the bait +>64%.
An animal enters the trap - the animal is a Possum. You don't need to track the possum, so you let it go, and wait.
A bobcat enters the trap - you have your animal - so you put on the radio collar.
Now realize this: If you wanted to catch a Possum, you'd have accomplished it on the first try.
If you wanted the names of everyone that wants to strip American Citizens of the right to decide for themselves what goes into their bodies, wants to enforce upon them an experimental treatment that would violate international law r.e. Medical Experimentation, and has the power to do so - this is a trap that guarantees you catch possums (No disrespect intended to America's marsupial).
All tyrants want the covid shot mandatory. All tyrants get the covid shot. All tyrants are on record.
The thing to bare in mind - I said nothing in regard to whether or not you should avoid the vaccine. There are side-effects. Everything from screwing with women's menstrual cycles, to the well known clotting issues. Considering the capacity of future-tech that is not available to the public right now ("near-classified"), those negative-effects are in many cases going to be reversible. The biggest threat the vaccines carry is their threat to fertility, which again, is fixable. Call it an "informed guess" and look at Bill Gates (a loser). Not so severe given that the long game [DS] is playing ain't going to happen. Safe enough for Trump to promote, dangerous enough that Biden has failed miserably to make it mandatory.
The simple fact is that Patriots in Control know that a large segment of our population is neutral, or doesn't know any better. Many people will get vaccines, and as Q has clarified "[NOT ALL]" are bad. Most of them on the market today are; it just so happens that the Covid vaccine is a double-edged sword that will serve the interests of patriots in (A) breaking the Covid gain of function bioweapon and (B) track whom has received the vaccine and vet them further as time goes on (Search names, social media, community control, etc.), and quite possibly (C) to use it as a tool to open eyes re: Pharma/Chemical Corporatists left unchecked.
It's not a matter of identifying free speech abusers. It's more likely a matter of Rex-84. Hostile civilians attempting to subvert the constitutional freedom of their fellow citizens. "Free speech abuse" is a whole different category from Citizens/non-citizens willingly attempting to create a Constitutional Crisis against their fellow countrymen.
Remember - Patriots work against those that represent a clear and present danger to the Constitutional Republic of the United States of America.
Want to see what "half right, wrong side" looks like?
The idea of this "decoder" is: We should get vaccines because they enable the military to keep record of patriots [FALSE].
Getting the vaccine enables collection of names, yes - but 36% are vaccinated, remainder refuses. Trump took a critical view toward vaccines. Q took a critical view toward vaccines (Drop neglected/omitted) by "decoder" as proof:
#4306
How do you convince people a vaccine is necessary [critical]?
At the 2004 "National Influenza Vaccine Summit," co-sponsored by CDC and the American Medical Association, Glen Nowak, associate director for communications at the NIP, spoke on using the media to boost demand for the vaccine. One step of a "Seven-Step `Recipe' for Generating Interest in, and Demand for, Flu (or any other) Vaccination" occurs when "medical experts and public health authorities publicly...state concern and alarm (and predict dire outcomes)—and urge influenza vaccination" (www.ama-assn.org/ama1/pub/upload/mm/36/2004_flu_nowak.pdf). Another step entails "continued reports...that influenza is causing severe illness and/or affecting lots of people, helping foster the perception that many people are susceptible to a bad case of influenza." Preceding the summit, demand had been low early into the 2003 flu season. "At that point, the manufacturers were telling us that they weren't receiving a lot of orders for vaccine for use in November or even December," recalled Dr Nowak on National Public Radio. "It really did look like we needed to do something to encourage people to get a flu shot." If flu is in fact not a major cause of death, this public relations approach is surely exaggerated. Moreover, by arbitrarily linking flu with pneumonia, current data are statistically biased. Until corrected and until unbiased statistics are developed, the chances for sound discussion and public health policy are limited.
I am a pediatrician and this propaganda affects my practice directly.
Therefore; Extremely well marketed vaccine = no go; no need.
The bigger game is that the "decoder" is half-right. Military are involved w/ vaccine roll out, names are being logged during vaccination process. But the "why" is wrong.
IF you analyze what the extremists/anti-Patriots view, 100% of them align AGAINST the personal freedom of individuals to refuse vaccinations. They would have you barred from society if they could; insurance companies refusing service, business requiring "vaccine passport," children taken away if you skip what their mother is allergic to you - etcetera. Enemies of WE the PEOPLE.
Now, the names of every radical that would enable tyrants here in the United States is logged in a book by the military, because all radicals have already been vaccinated.
Just remember.
Military rollout to assist with vaccination + Registration for vaccination + Reasonable doubt by Patriots who refuse to get vaccine = Certain people "need it" because they enter the system that way.
All vaccinated are on a list and, likely, vetted as soon as they are in the system.
Threats to Domestic Tranquility are recorded. Non-partisans and patriots are ignored.
Why else would Trump agree to marketing vaccination? Information is collected, circulated, and understood - those people that think you should be refused service by your insurance you paid for, over not getting the experimental COVID shot w/ immunity from legal recourse granted to manufacturers? Enemies of We the People. Those that think your right to live freely should be confined to home alone if you do not comply? Enemies of We the People.
All are potential threats. All are hostile domestics (some foreign).
Patriots are in control.
Sen. Ossoff is joined by Senators
Tammy Baldwin (D-WI)
Michael Bennet (D-CO)
Sherrod Brown (D-OH)
Cory Booker (D-NJ)
Tom Carper (D-DE)
Tammy Duckworth (D-IL)
Dick Durbin (D-IL)
Martin Heinrich (D-NM)
Mazie Hirono (D-HI)
Tim Kaine (D-VA)
Angus King (I-ME)
Amy Klobuchar (D-MN)
Patrick Leahy (D-VT)
Ben Ray Lujan (D-NM)
Ed Markey (D-MA)
Jeff Merkley (D-OR)
Chris Murphy (D-CT)
Patty Murray (D-WA)
Jack Reed (D-RI)
Bernie Sanders (I-VT)
Brian Schatz (D-HI)
Tina Smith (D-MN)
Jon Tester (D-MT)
Chris Van Hollen (D-MD)
Mark Warner (D-VA)
Raphael Warnock (D-GA)
Elizabeth Warren (D-MA)
Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI).
None of these people matter. Not one bit.
"Palestine" is a proxy, and a diversion, from what is happening in the U.S.
https://nypost.com/2021/04/19/trumps-urges-americans-to-get-vaccines-takes-shot-at-jj-pause/
Why would Trump urge?
Elected on premise of "vaccines being done wrong."
Knows large chunk of base vax-minimal.
Knows zero consent for experimental vaccine with pharma immunity.
Close, but No.
36% of Americans have been vaccinated. Some good, many bad - many shove the idea down your throat and would gladly expel you from society for embracing personal freedom.
Military assisting distribution of vaccines, CDC card issued for vaccines, who gets vaccines being tracked. Names in database from sign-up. Check out, verify good or bad, register.
Point completely missed by "decode" article:
#4306
How do you convince people a vaccine is necessary [critical]?
At the 2004 "National Influenza Vaccine Summit," co-sponsored by CDC and the American Medical Association, Glen Nowak, associate director for communications at the NIP, spoke on using the media to boost demand for the vaccine. One step of a "Seven-Step `Recipe' for Generating Interest in, and Demand for, Flu (or any other) Vaccination" occurs when "medical experts and public health authorities publicly...state concern and alarm (and predict dire outcomes)—and urge influenza vaccination" (www.ama-assn.org/ama1/pub/upload/mm/36/2004_flu_nowak.pdf). Another step entails "continued reports...that influenza is causing severe illness and/or affecting lots of people, helping foster the perception that many people are susceptible to a bad case of influenza." Preceding the summit, demand had been low early into the 2003 flu season. "At that point, the manufacturers were telling us that they weren't receiving a lot of orders for vaccine for use in November or even December," recalled Dr Nowak on National Public Radio. "It really did look like we needed to do something to encourage people to get a flu shot." If flu is in fact not a major cause of death, this public relations approach is surely exaggerated. Moreover, by arbitrarily linking flu with pneumonia, current data are statistically biased. Until corrected and until unbiased statistics are developed, the chances for sound discussion and public health policy are limited.
I am a pediatrician and this propaganda affects my practice directly.
What is the bearing?
Marketing of vaccines, by both Trump (purposeful), opposite known enemies (those who believe insurance companies should have the right to refuse you service based on being unvaccinated against certain diseases, ones who believe you should not be in public if you do not get the jab, ones who believe your infant should have 50 shots in a month long period).
Trump's expectation: We don't get it. But those of us who do, catalogued. Not malevolent - weeding out the good from the bad. All good - ignored after vetting. All bad - names on record, available targets for action.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rex_84
...detain large numbers of United States citizens deemed to be "national security threats", in the event that the president declared a National Emergency.
The only way.