3
BluegrassAnon 3 points ago +5 / -2

Your theory is that last year, trump's ceremony involved him not placing the wreath himself, so that next year, when Biden took office and the military again had the wreath in place without the president's help, it would seem normal to everyone else but the real story is that they only didn't have Biden place the wreath this year because he isn't the president?

So memorial day, one year ago, trump knew that Biden would be falsely in the white house?

-1
BluegrassAnon -1 points ago +1 / -2

I did see this on their website, but they seem to be basing the data off of a 5 year CVAP estimate from 2018 to get their totals. That seems like a terrible way to compare data

https://www.judicialwatch.org/documents/judicial-watch-voter-roll-study-oct-2020/

-1
BluegrassAnon -1 points ago +1 / -2

Huh well I did find this

https://publicinterestlegal.org/county-list-2019/

No source on the data though

0
BluegrassAnon 0 points ago +1 / -1

Which counties had voter registration go over 100%?

0
BluegrassAnon 0 points ago +1 / -1

Just seems weird that the site is adding a lot of made up detail on a clip nobody knows anything about

5
BluegrassAnon 5 points ago +6 / -1

Was this during a protest? The article says they don’t even know where/when. Why was that guy yelling at the truck in the first place?

0
BluegrassAnon 0 points ago +1 / -1

I’m not sure your wording was just really confusing.

0
BluegrassAnon 0 points ago +1 / -1

I agree but I’m a little confused. Is the guy I responded to the lefty?

1
BluegrassAnon 1 point ago +2 / -1

Bud that’s just people voting. It’s not deep state when people disagree with content you think is useful.

0
BluegrassAnon 0 points ago +1 / -1

Seems like a reach. What’s the tie? Who’s affiliated with them?

-1
BluegrassAnon -1 points ago +1 / -2

What was the world’s previous approach to a pandemic that was abandoned?

1
BluegrassAnon 1 point ago +2 / -1

What’s Holcim?

3
BluegrassAnon 3 points ago +4 / -1

Guys you can’t just share a meme and say it’s true. You’d need the actual sources if you want to redpill anyone.

2
BluegrassAnon 2 points ago +3 / -1

I don’t follow. What sort of “approval”?

0
BluegrassAnon 0 points ago +1 / -1

I’m making the argument that you appear to start with an idea, and then afterwards seek out facts to support it.

I would argue that the question you asked was rooted in suspicion, so wouldn’t you naturally try and seek out things that would support nefarious subtext?

0
BluegrassAnon 0 points ago +1 / -1

I mean, if you look into the why anyone says anything I don’t know how you don’t STOP researching.

I definitely don’t have any children in my basement by the way.

Why did I write that? Seems odd. But it would be silly to look into everything someone said because at some point you need to start with the basic facts rather than work backwards. If you start with a conclusion, and then start seeking things to support that theory, it’s an easy way to fall into a pattern of confirmation bias

0
BluegrassAnon 0 points ago +1 / -1

So then if you come into the statement already looking for a crime, wouldn’t you subconsciously make connections that might not actually be the full picture?

And even still, why wouldn’t you look at the timeline of events early on in your research?

0
BluegrassAnon 0 points ago +1 / -1

Mkay.

So here are the facts. You were very gung-ho about the fact that Biden himself admitted to this blackmailing and that was the jumping off point to your research, as I understand.

So, to me, if I were in your shoes and wanted to do my due diligence on learning what is the meaning behind Biden sharing this, I would first look at the basic facts, to answer the question, “is what Biden just said true?” As a matter of fact, no! According to events that actually happened, including time where Biden was in Ukraine vs the time when the prosecutor was fired (7 months later) vs when the money was paid, the very basis of the argument, Biden’s quote, is already false! Thus, if you had done your research and started at the start, I’d be confused how you got any farther than this point.

So, if you are aware that this quote that Biden stated implying blackmail does not actually reflect the timeline of events, why did you continue to dig?

1
BluegrassAnon 1 point ago +2 / -1

If they’re only letting in a certain number of people you’re not gonna see more fans in the seats. Reduced capacity is reduced capacity

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›