-1
BluegrassAnon -1 points ago +1 / -2

Yeah I’m curious about these magnet cases. Anyone have a video or anything?

0
BluegrassAnon 0 points ago +2 / -2

How does the tune go?

0
BluegrassAnon 0 points ago +1 / -1

Hm...do you remember anything about what happened? Any other names or anything?

1
BluegrassAnon 1 point ago +2 / -1

Post it on here!

6
BluegrassAnon 6 points ago +7 / -1

A disconnect is super healthy! I love doing that.

1
BluegrassAnon 1 point ago +2 / -1

I understand that they're from the same photo dump. But two photos in the same file can be taken days, months, weeks, years apart. They may not even come from the same camera or source.

What is the mark in the middle of the back of the woman in the photo with Hunter? Why isn't it on Malia's back? Is there a picture of that woman's face in the files on Hunter's laptop? If not, how do you know it's Malia? Is the birthmark the only connection, aside from a separate photo containing a credit card?

0
BluegrassAnon 0 points ago +1 / -1

Okay and what did your research lead to? Because there is a timeline of what happened.

When Biden made that statement to Ukraine officials, how long before the prosecutor was fired? And when did the US pay up?

This information is crucial to your argument.

0
BluegrassAnon 0 points ago +1 / -1

Right but I’d need to know that it’s true. I don’t want to just assume it.

0
BluegrassAnon 0 points ago +1 / -1

Well...yeah? I mean do you remember the fappening? Leaked photo dumps dropped from hacked iCloud accounts. If photos can be grabbed by nefarious means then it can’t be ruled out as a possibility.

A signature is not an admission because it’s not a signature that’s verified, or has any witness to it. It may have been used as evidence before, but I don’t really consider it an admission.

0
BluegrassAnon 0 points ago +1 / -1

In a way! I come on here from time to time. Def have other things I do more regularly but I wouldn’t say this site is an addiction, yet!

1
BluegrassAnon 1 point ago +2 / -1

I have the Pfizer vax and it doesn’t work on me. I hadn’t heard of this happening to anyone I know either.

-1
BluegrassAnon -1 points ago +1 / -2

Are you aware that Biden's statement that you are using to prove his corruption is not an actual illustration of the events that took place or not? Because you seem to just be avoiding that fact.

-1
BluegrassAnon -1 points ago +1 / -2

I am doing research. He never admitted that it was his laptop. You saying it's his signature isn't him admitting to it.

-2
BluegrassAnon -2 points ago +1 / -3

I understand that they're from the same photo dump. But two photos in the same file can be taken days, months, weeks, years apart. They may not even come from the same camera or source.

What is the mark in the middle of the back of the woman in the photo with Hunter? Why isn't it on Malia's back?

Is there a picture of that woman's face in the files on Hunter's laptop? If not, how do you know it's Malia? Is the birthmark the only connection, aside from a separate photo containing a credit card?

0
BluegrassAnon 0 points ago +2 / -2

The credit card picture, difficult to say that it's from the same scene. Do you know for sure those pictures were taken even in the same day? If so, how?

What birth mark are you seeing? The small dot on the leg? What about the huge mark over the back of the person in the photo with Hunter? Why does that not appear in the picture of Malia in her bathing suit?

-1
BluegrassAnon -1 points ago +1 / -2

Ah no I get it now. Well true to my word I'm pretty bummed about it. I don't know why it's funny thoguh.

-1
BluegrassAnon -1 points ago +1 / -2

Well, specifically I'm looking for a fact that ties the prosecutor directly to an investigation into Biden. I understand that you are drawing these conclusions, but it doesn't appear any rule of law is, considering that, again, the investigation that the prosecutor was apart of did not involve the Bidens at all. It taking place during Joe's last time in the white house doesn't really prove anything, since, again, he wasn't directly involved with Burisma at that time.

the point that you are actually making is that the Bidens haven't engaged in any fraudulent activity because people were demanding that the Prosecutor resign years before.

You are using the fact that the Prosecutor was already being investigated or whatever as the basis for your ENTIRE claim

Correction: the point I am making is not only that other people had been demanding his resignation years before, but also that he was investigating actions that the Bidens weren't even part of.

I originally saw the video where Biden said that he was witholding funds from Ukraine until the Prosecutor was fired. Well guess what, that Prosecutor was then fired.

So I see this video referenced a lot. Biden said, quote "I’m leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money. Well, son of a bitch. (Laughter.) He got fired. And they put in place someone who was solid at the time."

Now, I understand that you're taking that statement as fact, but if you do your research, you may find that the way Biden tells it is actually not exactly the timeline. Are you aware of that? Because if not, it may change your perspective a bit.

-1
BluegrassAnon -1 points ago +1 / -2

Hey! Glad you seem to be having a good day!

What about my answer was funny?

-1
BluegrassAnon -1 points ago +1 / -2

Okay well it's not on the files that I found, so maybe I didn't ge tthe wrong cache. Did you see the file dump? Do you have it?

When did Hunter admit the laptop was his?

-1
BluegrassAnon -1 points ago +1 / -2

Well that's the thing, I am seeing them as two separate issues. That's why I don't see what the problem is.

I'm not sure what "my news" is. I looked up the facts of the case and that's what I'm basing it off of. I didn't get these facts from some youtube personality or something.

But that's fine! If you don't have the facts I'm not interested either. Take care!

-1
BluegrassAnon -1 points ago +1 / -2

I have, and in fact, I downloaded it. But I'm not finding the email that you linked to. Furthermore, unless I got the "wrong dump," it just seems to be a bunch of HTML links. Doesn't seem like it came direct from the source, but I digress. Can you link that email to the specific email dump?

Who confirmed they were his emails? Do you know?

I've done a lot of research and this is the dead end I always hit. Nobody seems to really know where the emails came from, or at least confirm they were from the laptop

-1
BluegrassAnon -1 points ago +1 / -2

Eh, I don't think that's true. There are snap judgements people can make but opinions can change over time. You don't always hate the person you hate at first, and you won't always love the person you love. If your opinion on "my side" is so, do you autmatically assume that of me as well? Why not judge a person by their own individual actions?

The stance isn't that black people are "hunted down." It's that their perception is that their lives don't seem to matter as much as everyone else's do.

I absolutely agree that America should be free and fair. Do you think America has ever been that way?

-1
BluegrassAnon -1 points ago +1 / -2

Do you think being forward with your opinions that lead to insults is something that you like people to see you as, or not? Because you appear to be hyper-conscious of feeling as though you have to insult people, and I would imagine that's incredibly stressful.

A person does not have to be all in on supporting a person. They can support a president while still being critical of his policies. They can support a group wile disapproving of some of their actions. It never has to be all or nothing. I have friends I speak to regularly about politics and we have some days where we're upset with the current administration and some where we aren't. Some things that BLM has done I am incredibly supportive of, and I can also understand that many of their rallies have devolved into violence I don't agree with Things aren't so black/white, life/death.

I'm aware that I don't have to be here. I choose to be here to try and have civil discourse with people, because, if I'm being honest, I'm constantly confused how some people here get to the conclusions that they speak about. I don't think anyone is infringing on my rights right now, but you can't deny there are talks about violence towards anyone who is a democrat or even just wearing a mask.

Here's an image link of people on this site arguing about whether or not women should have the right to vote:

https://i.redd.it/dpy5qpen4hg61.png

-1
BluegrassAnon -1 points ago +1 / -2

You linked to a site with tons of examples that have to do with "In every other election this happens, but in THIS election something different happened," which is what we've labeled to be statistical pattern discrepancy being touted as evidence, which it isn't.

The research I've done has done little to convince me that the election was stolen.

Put it this way: If I were in your shoes, and knew of some slam dunk examples, I'd be THRILLED to share them with someone who's asking about it. I just don't understand why you hesitate to do the same.

Also, I don't watch TV, at least not any MSM or anything that calls itself news. You seem to have made up my mind about how I gather my information without knowing for sure what I've found so far.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›