Well assuming they can't track your account on those sites (ip, email), or a phone connection connecting the theoretical buyer to the seller "burner" that's truly unlinked to car/store), you still have the crypto owner got it from somewhere and then would likely be able to describe you to authorities if you made a face to face transaction. And the more shifty you are, the more likely the person would be suspicious and attentive.
And then wherever you spend the crypto could be tracked and potentially glean information back to you from that side because a retailer would have cameras or people they interacted with, etc.
But yes, I'm sure it's possible, just a lot less likely now than say 10 years ago.
Initially it was easy to mine and you could trade with just a logon account, but that changed a while ago where you need KYC in NA, but I don't know how it is around the world. I imagine there is some country out there that lets you buy/sell without it, but I haven't looked :)
While I agree in general, the blockchain could be stopped at the network backbone level, blocking its data connecting miners/etc that host the info. Splits could potentially be created in transactions by, say, continental region and then need to be rectified against the others. New blocks mined, transactions made, etc could throw the whole thing in disarray. I imagine this would have to be at the federal agency level (nsa, etc), combined with other countries and it would be very obvious after a certain point in time. Trust would plummet, splits could divide the value significantly and chaos would ensue. Attack BTC and the whole crypto community would go into chaos, plummeting as people pull out.
Just an armchair theory, but crypto is very reliant on the network for maintaining and creating its value and that isn't uninterruptable, just very robust.
DWAC is the stock, DWACW are warrants which give you the right to buy stock at a cheaper price. You'll need the money to do that though. I've seen a lot of people recommending Warrants since they're cheaper to get more of.
If you buy Bitcoin or most crypto from KYC places like Coinbase, the currency is VERY TRACEABLE. It's a public blockchain, so if they know who you are, and what coin they give you, then they have a full trail of what you did with it from there. It's not like cash at all in that sense. You might want to update you understanding of crypto because it's not private at all unless you get it anonymously, and that that ship has sailed for most of the West. Even if you get it anonymously, if you spend it it can be backtracked to the wallet you're holding it in. A lot of the "silk road" people got tracked and sent to prison.
I'm pretty sure even the most peaceful, optimistic person on the planet has an underlying vehemence seething just under the surface about this stuff. The pendulum is going to swing back hard and nobody's going to respond to emotional appeal after all this abuse. Kids are kids and don't know the depths of what is going on, but parents absolutely do.
ok fair enough, I really don't follow the guy and just put up a case for a possible baby Christian who is clueless with a lot of weird stuff in his past.
By his fruit I deem him to be a wildly unordinary, bipolar very baby Christian.
Apparently he's bipolar and hyper-creative, and was saved late in his life with a lot of baggage. He's not going to follow a traditional path. Christians don't have to be perfect to be Christians.
I doubt it.
From how far back? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R8KZxcVK7Kc
high school photo?: https://www.pinterest.com/pin/409194316143643861/
When she was young that thing was extremely uncommon.
More younger photos https://www.businessinsider.nl/photos-laura-ingraham-life-fox-news-2020-3/
The superbowl is a huge time for sex trafficking, that's why they are there.
Who says an unprovable possibility couldn't happen? Or could happen? Why not ask other questions, like why are we even discussing this? Are we bored? Wishful? Inquisitive? Or do we merely appreciate the Socratic method of discussing things? Perhaps so? Likely? Maybe?
Not likely, given she doesn't have military background and probably hasn't been read-in on most of the classified stuff. She's the wife of an elected official, not an official.
Not saying she isn't smart, or couldn't be read-in, or couldn't know a lot of stuff over the years.
Welcome back, you were missed. :)
His debate versus Kamala was fire also. He shredded her, although admittedly that's not hard to do.
This person builds a case based on people Pence had on his team of staffers. It asserts this was not some kind of planned infestation of the Pence organization, or corruption of them, but rather that Pence was in some way guilty by association due to his preferential selection of them.
I'm not buying it.
God knows our end from the beginning, so it's hard to say what isn't part of His plan versus what are ripples on it.
https://twitter.com/TheRealKeean/status/1487947493849632770?s=20&t=o3u9llFiX72WZ2XRjX3_sw
I saw this. Sorry for the twat link, not sure how to archive quickly.
"They are being confident and self assured, not complying with my shaming techniques. I am falling apart and short circuiting with confusion and fear. Here come the comforting dampness of my tears. I need to post about it and find my safe space."
to make the message more palatable and let the message sink in, instead of being derailed by offense before the payload was delivered? Good question.
Trump could easily restore Pence and throw his full support behind him. He hasn't done that because he's returning to office, but I can see a realistic timeline where Pence could possibly be the following President. Not saying it's not a long-shot, but Trump and a few years as VP for Pence could make that happen. We obviously have a lot of questions that need to be addressed before then though, and it's definitely not for everyone.
If Trump had to bring in vaccines to speed up the Reset timeline, and we as a country had to go through this last year to wake people up, perhaps Pence was playing a part as well. I've heard talk here about Pence being a super creepy bad guy, but Trump did choose him (and he knew about Epstein), so perhaps this stuff was presented as a way to secure his part. I'm really curious how things will play out for him.
Could someone debunk the "bad behavior" or "defaced monuments" narrative with first-hand reports? Is this happening or fiction?
When did I assert that Cash was untraceable?