2
Die_Commie_Scum 2 points ago +2 / -0

Ya know I never thought about that part on hydrogen. Yea I can imagine that there would be some threshold where you would save energy in transportation if you used pipelines. Unless I suppose you were in close proximity to the power plant. But yea a lot of power is moved over hundreds of miles and a lot of energy is wasted. More than 50% in some cases. I can imagine that a way to pipe it and store it couldn't be all that different than say natural gas, or propane, except you can't pressurize it into liquid form. To me that would probably be the biggest hindrance to making say a hydrogen car. You would need a pretty huge tank to go all that far, whereas using something like propane can be condensed to something small.

2
Die_Commie_Scum 2 points ago +2 / -0

I see what you mean. To use them as backup. But you will still no matter what always have some loss no matter what with every step you take away from the origional power source. Hybrid cars to me seem like the best option for pure efficiency. Using some electric and some gas allows for regenerative braking or I've heard some places are even toying with electronic generating suspension. There is a similar problem with hydrogen as with EV tho. In order to make hydrogen out of water. You need to run an electric current thru it. The problem here lies in that you need more electricity power to split the H2O than you will get energy from burning it. That's why when you try to make the perpetual motion machine where you burn hydrogen to power the generator to make the electricity to split the water and try to run the loop, it doesn't work for long. Eventually it sputters itself out. Crazy enough the most efficient way to make hydrogen comes from oil. It's a by product of making things like acetylene although I'm not sure how it works

2
Die_Commie_Scum 2 points ago +2 / -0

Kek. Gotta love the new age rich kid "bourgeois marxists" isn't the dialectic wonderful?

2
Die_Commie_Scum 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is stupid. Instead of taking fuel and turning it directly into motion for the vehicle, you would have them turn fuel into motion, motion into electricity, electricity into battery and battery back into motion. The only thing it beats is having to make the energy somewhere else and ship it miles thru power lines to get to your car

4
Die_Commie_Scum 4 points ago +4 / -0

I suppose you are confusing the Talmud with the Quran. Because clearly you haven't read any of it to give your wonderful thesis. You dumbshits really don't seem to realize the difference between globalist elites who have some Jewish bloodline that don't care about any of the peasant castes, and folks who just want to live their lives and worship in peace. And just as a history for anyone who wants to argue my point, the Rothschilds bankrolled IG Farben and the rest of the nazi regime and made lots of money on it. There were Rothscgild in Londan thru all of WW2. Its retards like you that dumbshit leftists use as poster child's to call all of US on the right nazis. Because your retarded