1
Drawdraw45 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes, you can tell that Q intentionally posted this 552 hours later, so was definitely a planned post. However what would've made it a proof would be if trump or someone in his circle posted about the storm in way relating back to either of those posts.

3
Drawdraw45 3 points ago +3 / -0

From what I've heard from those even in the patriot community is that Carter wasn't a bad person. He was actually a really well meaning soul and didn't have any ties to any of the trafficking shit. Even actively fought against it iirc.

BUT he was not cut out for being the president and was absolutely unfit for the job. One of the cleares examples of the roads to hell being paved with good intentions.

However, I say take what I said with a grain of salt because it's coming off of memory from a couple different podcast episodes and interviews I heard years ago.

1
Drawdraw45 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's been killing me every time I come across it. Their code talk is so fucking corny and obvious. This plus all their little conspiracy theories I've been seeing, like when they were all convinced Trump wouldn't get inaugurated.

Loll it's like their a gay watered down knockoff version of us.

3
Drawdraw45 3 points ago +3 / -0

This needs a lot more updoots and a lot more attention. This is taking over the liberal side of tiktok. It is EVEYWHERE. I have save so many videos of this, someone I know even had their business account get messaged on tiktok by a previous customer asking about cute winter boots.

The comment sections are filled with these loons talking in their not so subtle and super cringe coded language. They are saying things like kill the rich, eat the rich, and are organizing to buy guns and plan events.

1
Drawdraw45 1 point ago +1 / -0

You realize he spike digitally right? He did not actually attend.

2
Drawdraw45 2 points ago +2 / -0

Posts like this don't get enough upvotes here to get real discussion rolling. Why would he do this? This Stargate deal was one of Trump's huge announcements about bringing investment into the US, he has been talking about this deal with Masa for awhile now.

Why would Elon come out and make claims that Softbank doesn't have the money and he has it on good authority? Elon really really does not like Sam Altman and has been in legal battles with him and OpenAI. Is he letting his own personal vendetta come before his responsibilities? Or is there something else at play?

Seeing how petty he was with Asmongold I would say it's likely the former, but who knows.

3
Drawdraw45 3 points ago +3 / -0

I always remember him talking about Racine it being "the root". Did he actually specifically mention "Stargate AI"?

2
Drawdraw45 2 points ago +2 / -0

Not true with quantum computers. Specifically referencing the "0's and 1's" part, don't disagree with you necessarily otherwise.

2
Drawdraw45 2 points ago +2 / -0

You should add Elon gaming tantrum to that list now too as of what's taken place the past 24 hours.

1
Drawdraw45 1 point ago +1 / -0

Look, I'm going to lead with this just so it's out on the table. You can check my comment and post history, ever since the H-1B debacle I've been really fucking sour on Elon. For me it's how he handled it all on so many levels, the many other red flags about his past, and ultimately just a gut feeling.


Even still, I am completely open to being proven wrong. In fact, I want to be proven wrong on this as things play out. I will gladly take my egg to the face in great stride. But I just want to know, what is your silver lining with the recent gaming debacle?

What kind of psyop trick is he trying to pull by becoming a living meme with a large percentage of the gaming audience over night? Why is he getting into spats with streamers, stripping their checkmarks, leaking their DMs with the intent to "expose", when all it really did was expose his seeming lack of understanding of how the streamer content pipeline works.

Why is he wasting time with frivolous shit like that? He's giving the left so much valid ammunition in this particular instance. I genuinely want to know why you think someone (who is supposed to be engaged in such impactful information warfare) would handle this entire situation like he has.


Edit: Forgot to ask, and ffs why tf is he constantly engaging with Ian Miles Cheong. I'd say if we're going to say Stew Peters and the Groypers are problematic, Ian is just as bad if not worse than the lot of them.

2
Drawdraw45 2 points ago +2 / -0

This appears to be a repeating pattern, and you're right I forgot about Kash saying that.

Also, on the topic of DARPA, I've talked about this recently in another comment. But do you find it curious that DARPA had an AI project called XAI that started in 2017 and ended in 2021.

Then after purchasing twitter and renaming it to X, Elon decided to challenge OpenAI, Google, and other AI companies by launching xAI in 2023.

2
Drawdraw45 2 points ago +2 / -0

"I thought you said a minor" loll no I was making a snarky comment. I wasn't sure you were if you were responding to me or the other person.

And even in the case of you responding to the other person, I felt you comparing them to a liberal woman was uncalled for so basically said you were describing yourself.

2
Drawdraw45 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thanks for the clarification. I agree with your depiction of the mega wealthy and even moreso the true elites. I would be pressed to argue the contrary for at least the vast majority of them, and yeah the H-1B debate was a great illustration of that.

2
Drawdraw45 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah the brain chip and the chain of events that led him to seeing that as a "necessity" have always been a bit of a red flag for me.

I agree with your overall assessment, I think it will become very obvious where he truly stands over the course of this next term

2
Drawdraw45 2 points ago +2 / -0

Interesting post friend. I don't have much debate to offer here other than on the "stop the presses" part. Idk if that was meant to diminish what was being put forth, but I do think there is more to it than that.

As far as the republic part goes, I would argue at least from a results based standpoint that we've seen in our own nations case instances of why a direct democracy "likely" would have been much worse. The 2016 election for example. There's a reason I think the left is always quick to remind us we are a "democracy", because I do think they would prefer if we were a direct democracy rather than a constitutional republic.

As far as the historical intricacies of the argument, I can't really debate you much there without doing more learning myself. I am willing to cede that you are clearly more knowledgeable on this topic than myself. Thanks for the insightful post though, I do appreciate it.

5
Drawdraw45 5 points ago +5 / -0

I get what you're saying, but if you read my post you would understand that is not the point of it at all.

Also let me show you why that logic is flawed. So if "There are more important issues than Elon's "gaming cred"". Then why doesn't Elon himself uphold the same sentiment? Because his recent posts and actions state otherwise, at least for him.

view more: Next ›