People always give him credit for predicting 9/11 when in reality he ripped that from Bill Cooper. Bill Cooper was killed shortly after as well, and for some reason AJ was allowed to go on unimpeded.
I pray healing upon you in the name of Jesus and wish you the best!
Israel did do JFK.
It's not unlikely, he is and has been a very questionable figure.
Read Beat_it_commie's comment above. There are lots of very damning items in these documents. Examples:
- Document claiming a clique within the CIA orchestrated the assassination
- Angleton's tied to mossad
- The CIA requesting redactions of anywhere mentioning Israel or the Jews.
These alone would be major reasons Pompeo would never want them to see the light of day.
ChatGPT isn't going to point you to the truth on controversial matters without some serious prompting. There's a lot more smoking guns pointing to the CIA doing it and the Israeli connections in the documents.
I really need the sauce on this one too. Need to know if it's actually from the files, because this quote has circulated around for years and was always taken with a grain of salt because no "verification".
Agreed 100% as someone who has been trying to point out Alex Jones and his cia/mossad roots since the beginning of this board. So many people here also don't know that he ripped his 9/11 predictions from Bill Cooper who was later killed for it either. Alex Jones has long been the carnival barker used to make "conspiracy theorists" look crazy to normal people.
You're getting mass downvoted but this and/or them operating as captured assets against their will are some of the only scenarios in which they can be trusted.
Yep, its way too common here now. We should be accepting of others coming to our side, but that doesn't mean we should be letting our guards down. That also doesn't mean we should be forgetting these "converts" extremely questionable pasts. Infiltration is a real thing, there are many trojan horses in the movement.
You are right to keep your guard up. This is just surface level b.s. and people here should not be blindly eating it up. She is a practicing witch and has a past rife with illuminati/satanist symbolism.
This is fundamentally untrue and can be countered with one single name. Bill Barr. That is just one name out of many as well. Trump and the white hats have appointed many traitors throughout this process. It doesn't mean they don't serve a purpose and aren't selected intentionally. However, just because they are selected to serve a specific purpose doesn't make them any less of a traitor either.
I would suggest you utilize your own advice in this case. You are also making an assumption that I am assuming her position out of the gate. There have been many criticisms about her past in Florida. There were even many people here that were disappointed when she was selected. That doesn't mean she shouldn't be in her position and it doesn't mean she isn't serving her intended purpose. But again I will posit that it is a mistake to believe that just because Trump selects someone that means the person is legitimately on the side of the patriots.
Yes but that's not what the public optics were and that is specifically what I'm talking about.
I don't quite agree with this notion, and think if you look at the prevalence of the kabbalist manifestation popping up in the form of mysticism in all the major religions history might state otherwise.
I also don't believe the Bible itself is unscathed from their touch. Another historical element to their control of Rome would be the Knights Templar and the Jesuits doing their bidding, along with the popes they have controlled. I think if there is any form of separation and differing degrees of hierarchy, then it's just a matter of being different limbs on the same beast.
And who do you think the deep state is? What are their roots? What is their long standing mission?
Ofc I would criticize Trump if it was warranted, especially when it comes to public optics. What do you think happened even here when he was talking about how good the vaccine was after losing the election.
Do you remember him getting booed over it and rightfully so?
Yeah but that's just because Rome was captured by the Zionists long ago imo. They are one and the same, they serve the same master.
A good example of this would be Stew Peters imo.
I agree with most of these except the "so-and-so" part. There has been various people throughout this entire process that Trump has appointed or utilized that have either failed to deliver our outright acted as traitors to the patriot movement.
This doesn't mean Trump and the Q team didn't get their use out of them. However, it is still justifiable that people called them out on their actions and continue to do so with the current administration imo. This is an important part of activating the public voice and position as well.
It's not just the flaking, it's the taking the time to police muh anti-semitism while in the process of flaking. She rightfully needs to be called out on it, and being critical of her or anyone for that matter is not dooming.
This is the way imo, and this is the point I want others around here to get.
Define dooming. This is where that sentiment can become problematic. For some the view of what can be constituted as dooming is too loose.
And the pysop only works if it spurs people to talk about it and point it out. Whereas if we just stay silent and trust that all is fine as others around here would like, then the intended effect would not be achieved.
If an action is bad or antithetical to the America first movement, we should 100% call it out and continue to be active in the public domains. This is the way the public will wake up, this is the way they will become active as both Q and the founders envisioned, this is the way the overton window on muh anti-semitism will shift.
Reading the normie level rationalizations here is bewildering to me.
You know the elites and more specifically the occultists we're dealing with have been known to sacrifice loved ones? This wouldn't be out of the ordinary.