-3
Forkyou -3 points ago +1 / -4

Cause he's a nervous wreck? An idiot? Fuck if I know

-3
Forkyou -3 points ago +2 / -5

I need a little more substance from George news and the twitter-level gut feels from the other articles.

Not surprised that he had to bring notes with him, but yeah it was pretty obvious what kinds of questions would come up (border, guns, etc). No doubt DJT would have just come out guns blazing.

-5
Forkyou -5 points ago +2 / -7

Didn't they do so in the article you shared though?

Anyway, if I were a betting man, I would have predicted that he would get a question on gun violence after the week that passed lol

Ditto the border, filibuster, etc. All I saw was a boring ass conference.

-2
Forkyou -2 points ago +1 / -3

Did you cheer on AOC when she did the exact same thing in like 2019? Lol

Ted's right about one thing, it's all goddamn theater

-2
Forkyou -2 points ago +1 / -3

Great punchline.

Does need cleaning up though, inconsistent font for Joe/Reaper makes it look like Joe's speaking in panels 3 & 4, and the grammar/punctuation is just shot in the third panel.

-5
Forkyou -5 points ago +3 / -8

Yeah that is awful, it's for the daily press briefings though, not really a slam dunk.

If the reporters outed them for asking for briefing questions ahead of time, why not expose them for asking for press conference questions if that's what happened? Why even out them at all if they're on the same side? Shit's complicated

-7
Forkyou -7 points ago +2 / -9

Alas, and I wanted to know why you would ask if he had the questions given to him beforehand. I guess we will both have to live with these mysteries until the end of our days.

And I apologize for my outburst, it clearly showed the extent to which I was upset.

-7
Forkyou -7 points ago +3 / -10

That would have made it a rehearsed event rather than a press conference. And after talking about their aim for "transparency" would be damn hypocritical. Great red pill material. So, source?

-9
Forkyou -9 points ago +1 / -10

Sorry I think you failed to answer my question and just threw a random question out instead. Oh, is that your "schtick"?

-8
Forkyou -8 points ago +3 / -11

That's pretty bad, source?

-10
Forkyou -10 points ago +1 / -11

What reason would I have to believe that aside from prejudice?

-22
Forkyou -22 points ago +3 / -25

Were you disappointed that he got through it without too many gaffes? All this talk about him being hidden away because of his declining mental faculties, having to read scripts, be fed answers through an ear piece, etc etc. Kind of a letdown that it was just a boring press conference huh?

-2
Forkyou -2 points ago +1 / -3

Thanks for taking my smart-assery in such a good natured way, and being open about mental illness which has been so stigmatized.

-2
Forkyou -2 points ago +2 / -4

Lol could have picked a picture where he isn't in a golf cart?

-2
Forkyou -2 points ago +1 / -3

so most likely (if the hearsay is true) no he was not actually allowed to legally have a gun (if it was a felony that he was in jail for)

Well that's useful.

-2
Forkyou -2 points ago +1 / -3

How many other EMCs have you discovered in your research?

Are you saying that we shouldn't sell guns to people with mental illnesses? How would we find out about that? Like some sort of background check?

-2
Forkyou -2 points ago +1 / -3

Proofs of Venezuelan involvement? Those would have been useful like 4 or 5 months ago.

0
Forkyou 0 points ago +4 / -4

Supposedly according to who?

All I could find online was that he had to do community service on account of third-degree assault. Not jail time. Do you scrutinize your sources?

view more: Next ›