But it doesn't teach them where to point it. Kids are very literate. What might seem like the least consequence for them, may be the most for you.
Have you ever met kids giving you impossible hypotheticals to the point where you need them to stfu? Clear and concise instructions prevent mishaps. And education in firearms teaches discipline. A direction of least consequence could be anywhere. You point a rifle at the ground or at a wall and it goes off, could knock off the ground/wall and hit someone. If it shoots in the air, could come back down and hit someone. And teaching ballistics to children isn't an easy thing to do
A lesson many liberals forget. Most of these wealthy people of whom the liberals are envious of, put their enterprises and life on the line so they could be free. As the price to forgive us from sin is blood, so to is the price of liberty. And so long as corruption tries to grasp America's paid right, a storm will brew and swallow the tyrants whole!
Wrong day ya tit hahaha
It's not just rare though. It's extremely rare. Fair enough if you are using surplus ammunition and an unreliable firearm. Even then it's still extremely rare. I know a guy that's mate shot a target pin and it ricocheted into his shoulder. Freak accidents happen. Do you wear big ballistic shoulder pads for shooting? No. You wear ear defenders as it is likely to damage your hearing as it is past the safe decibel range. I don't wear safety specs. At the end of the day, it's personal choice. That's why it's called, "PPE". PERSONAL protective equipment"...
No no no. What I'm saying is it may not be practical to point it in a place that is less consequential because the consequences can vary so drastically in one's mind. Imagine teaching a kid to point it in a place with the least consequences, you leave it up to their own interpretation of what that means. Saying, "don't flag your buddies and civilians, and only point it at a direct threat to your life" would be better. Because it is more direct and leaves the only possible option in a manner of self defence. Making it more practical for those who are mentally inadequate of interpretation
A direction of least consequence isn't necessarily practical
Count dankula?
A really good one is to know what's behind and around the intended target to prevent damage or injury to another person or yourself. I recommend you teach them marksmanship principles. Maybe take them out to training days. It's funny how the UK laughs at America's "crazy" gun laws yet it lets 12 year olds shoot with the MOD. Hypocrisy that doesn't need to be there
It's not needed. Firearms are not going to blow your eyes off. Imagine you're carrying and a criminal pulls out his weapon. "hold up criminal, let me put on some safety specs". If you want that extra safety when training then fair days. But the likeliness that your eyes will be significantly damaged is lower than being involved in a plane crash.
Fair point!
Should be fine. Just a bit more complicated due to the other fractures
You don't need eye protection unless your weapon ejects casings the wrong way or, is experimental
Hold up. Rocket launchers? Imagine if antifa could get rocket launchers. Maybe some are within a legitimate reason
Maybe. If she's arrested. Would be a big surprise for us. My birthday is this month. So would be a gift from God!!!
I have the real footage https://www.facebook.com/1110928554/videos/1471270066682595/
Is that not due to the USSR making it part of Ukraine?
Similar features of Robert Maxwell but definitely not him. Idk what Ukraine has to do with this. I'll have a look for his relatives though
So from my observations. It is possible they are the same person. Because she is in the shade of the car, her eyes can appear dark although, I can make out a hint of blue. This could be due to her surroundings like a blue car or sky and the other pic has a flash highlighting her eyes by light. The nose I discounted as noses can be broken and deform over time. Tends to stay the same for middle aged and elderly people. The hairline looks very similar and although the roots are darker on the confirmed RC pic, the hair is very similar also, The ears look really similar. The lips look larger and lighter, but that is expected. Everything about the lips looks the same. The skin complexion looks like a match also. I seem to recognise the man in the background. I think that's the true important element here
My reaction to seeing Greg Phillips' post https://i.imgflip.com/49a5w7.jpg
I did see a good decode in regards to this here. I'll try find it for you
I honestly don't know. There's a lot of research that's been going on for years
She must of knew the agents would testify to her bullshit though right?
Hopefully many more to come. But must be watched closely for liberty is always one step from tyranny
?