6
InglediSLI 6 points ago +6 / -0

Thank you! I enjoy seeing these daily.

3
InglediSLI 3 points ago +3 / -0

You'll never be a woman! Give up!

20
InglediSLI 20 points ago +20 / -0

Hillary. Oh please God let the first one be Hillary.

by Evspra
11
InglediSLI 11 points ago +11 / -0

The sticky posts look great! One suggestion, make the edited icon a light color because right now it's nearly invisible.

https://i.imgur.com/jj5PkCE.png

by fvdb
0
InglediSLI 0 points ago +1 / -1

Lol, It was symbolism, not symbols, but touche anyway

by fvdb
1
InglediSLI 1 point ago +2 / -1

No, it's just not relevant at all. I, and many others, probably agree with what you wrote, but it seems like just a rant meant for your personal blog.

by fvdb
1
InglediSLI 1 point ago +2 / -1

Great monologue. Is it relevant to Q?

3
InglediSLI 3 points ago +3 / -0

Everyone I don't like is a white supremacist/nazi/russian.

3
InglediSLI 3 points ago +3 / -0

To add to this. Robinhood's main customer is Citadel who buys trade data from them to front run retail investors. Citadel is infusing Melvin Capital with cash (in exchange for shares of the firm) to help Melvin who are the ones hemorrhaging the most because of their naked shorts on GameStop.

Citadel (probably) told Robinhood to stop allowing people to buy GameStop and other stocks to let Melvin recover a bit.

2
InglediSLI 2 points ago +2 / -0

/r/wallstreetbets decided to take on the challenge of making a few hedge funds go belly up from their short positions. Bit of an exaggeration, but only a bit.

1
InglediSLI 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm so enticed to short GME but I learned never to go against Elon. Dude can make anything turn into a rocket.

23
InglediSLI 23 points ago +23 / -0

"No reason for an acct" says the guy who makes an account to post

2
InglediSLI 2 points ago +2 / -0

The way I understand it is that no laws since 1914 are valid/constitutional/real. 1914 because that's when the first batch of senators were elected by direct elections from the 17th amendment. That amendment isn't constitutional because "the Constitution forbids Congress from even discussing the matter of where Senators are elected." Read more here. Therefore, all laws passed are unconstitutional because they all require the senate as part of the process.

I'm sure a lot of arguments can be more for various other dates. Regardless, I think realistically it's unlikely that all laws would just cease to exist since some date many decades ago. My thought is that some or most laws would probably be integrated into the real constitution. Just my best guess.

by Evspra
15
InglediSLI 15 points ago +15 / -0

Imagine the lives those people lead. Such an absurd waste of time.

1
InglediSLI 1 point ago +1 / -0

Is there a purpose to the flood of low effort posts you're submitting?

https://i.imgur.com/yey1tc1.png

2
InglediSLI 2 points ago +2 / -0

Shillcon 1!! Shillcon 1!! Shillcon 1!!

2
InglediSLI 2 points ago +2 / -0

Appreciate the comment. Never quite thought about if those 3 bullets you outlined even matter at all in the context of a cabal ruling the world.

1
InglediSLI 1 point ago +1 / -0

I would look at this comment and the reply I made to it. I still feel like I'm missing something, or maybe a lot of somethings, but it at least helped me a bit.

2
InglediSLI 2 points ago +2 / -0

Just wanted to add a link for people to get some more detail on a point that really shocked me in your link. Your link has a bullet that reads, in part, "which recognized the people of the United States of America are enemies of Corp. U.S."

Here's another link that provides more context on that bullet.

https://scannedretina.com/2014/04/01/congress-declares-american-citizens-as-the-enemy-declares-war-1933/

2
InglediSLI 2 points ago +2 / -0

Beyond a reasonable doubt is actually a VERY high bar. Regardless, you're not going to get a smoking gun. No one here has one that will satisfy the world of billions of people. This isn't like deriving the Pythagorean theorem with the axioms of mathematics unpinning the whole process.

At this point I think you know that and, for me, the benefit of the doubt is waning. Seems like you're just here just to do this elaborate troll and I bit in more than others. Hope I'm wrong, but you do you.

1
InglediSLI 1 point ago +1 / -0

Agreed. It's reassuring to know that this isn't worrying to me.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›