Not that we know of yet, anyway.
How many times can one person bring peace to the Middle East?
Serious question.
But isn't that exactly what they say Trump says? Projection?
u/Brent75 this is the reason why I keep reporting him. He almost never does it, and I've commented many times in his threads about it. Have y'all verified him? Many other posters have complained. If the guys actually old, I guess I get it, but it's getting tiring.
Perhaps they need the content so much that they just turn a blind eye to it?
Well said.
It's all about integrity and respect.
It's concerning that not only do so few people have it or give it, but that it's openly and actively scorned when pointed out that people should do it.
What do you imagining happening after the documents are released that will result in justice?
Seriously asking.
I just don't understand why people think that just because we will now be able to access this stuff (maybe), that it will do anything.
It's not like the powers that be that can actually do anything (like the justice department) haven't known about all this (and more) for decades.
But they're not going to actually do anything about it until we see these documents?
Why is that? Honestly.
Well, there goes the cease fire in the Middle East.
Let's see how the Russia/Ukraine mess goes today.
There's a difference between X handing out special check marks and the government verifying the identity of whatever account X has given such a checkmark to, right?
X=/=government.
A government verified checkmark?
When did the government start verifying checkmarks on X?
I thought all you needed to do to get one is pay a fee.
Here’s the kicker from the article “ unlawful procurement of citizenship or naturalization. ”. How exactly was he able to do that?
Well, it explains how he was able to do that in the very same article...
Muchimba was also found guilty at trial of unlawful procurement of naturalization," the U.S. Attorney’s Office said. "During the scheme, Muchimba applied to become a naturalized U.S. citizen and provided false information to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services officers by telling them that he had not committed any crimes for which he had not been arrested. That offense carries a maximum penalty of ten years of incarceration and possible administrative denaturalization." > >
Why would they be arrested today? It's not like all this information hasn't been known for years to the justice department.
How many people who were involved with all this back in the 1960s is even still alive?
But Obama once had papers in DC signed with the AutoPen when he was in France, and it was determined that he could do that. 🤷♀️
And then again, when he was in Hawaii and papers in DC needed to be signed.
But sure, the courts are just going to ignore that they've allowed this to happen several times in the past, and they're suddenly just going to make it illegal to do now, and have the legality of it become retroactive.
Because that's how laws work. 🙄
Ok. Let's go with that, then.
Did the VP or cabinet officers find him mentally unfit to be President?
Just kicking that can further down the street.
Yeah...that's not how the legal system works. You don't put people in jail anticipating that something might be brought to court that would result in future actions being handled differently.
Your logic isn't logicing very well here.
Yeah, I should start doing that, too.
But if I went around constantly pointing out all the shit that never happened that was constantly touted as being imminent, then I would get banned for dooming.
I just wish I could understand how it is that everyone else seems to forget all about these awesome things that people insist are happening, but never quite seem to make the jump from daydreaming to reality 🤷♀️
How can the Brunson case ever be decided if the Supreme Court never agrees for it to be heard? This is an example of what I'm talking about. People are still clinging to this fantasy, when there is zero amount of evidence to suggest it will ever happen.
If the 2020 election was fraudulent and Biden's entire term was nullified due to fraud...why would Biden using an Autopen ever even matter?
We could play "what if" all day, every day, and it would still end in the same result.
Too many people are living in these fantasy worlds where they just "what if" and "just imagine" everything.
It's better to live in reality, and not be constantly driving people away by all these endless rounds of pipedreams that does nothing but make people angry and disillusioned when the vast majority of what they are told never happens.
I'm going to point out an issue in the making here.
In a month or so, we're going to have a lot of people getting angry because they're not going to see all these people Biden pardoned getting picked up and thrown in jail. They're going to stomp around with yet another round of "Trump isn't doing what he said!"
Because they actually think that President Trump just posting on social media that Biden's use of the Autopen invalidated his actions as President is somehow legally valid.
So they'll be all disappointed when nothing happens, come here and complain about it, then get slapped with some bans for dooming, and then they'll stomp away in a huff because "censorship!".
Then the people that keep posting that all those Biden pardons will be revoked immediately are just going to pretend that they weren't getting peoples hopes up based on nothing more than ignorance of basic laws and wishful thinking.
In the meantime, all the normies that they gloated to that the DS/libs are about to get theirs are going to just toss this example right up on top of the pile of other failed pipedreams that represents our lack of credibility to the general public.
Seriously, does no one else see the pattern with this type of thing?
Why do you think Trump's post is in any way legally valid?
Sounds great. How is it going to be shown that the 2020 election was fraudulent, though?
We're still in the same boat. A court of law would have to make that ruling. Not sure if you remember, but we filed dozens, if not hundreds of lawsuits all over the country, from small courts to the Supreme Court, for four years, to try to show that the 2020 election was fraudulent. As far as I'm aware, not a single court ruled that the election was fraudulent.
But you believe the courts are going to rule the 2020 election was fraudulent now? Why?
For what? It's not illegal for a President to use an Autopen.
So they went to all the trouble of making a clone or hiring someone to pull off perhaps the biggest con in recent history, and they couldn't be bothered to create/find a semi-competent one?
It's crazy how they can simultaneously do so well with all their scheming while simultaneously failing so miserably at it. 🙄
It's not being a Debbie Downer. It's just operating in reality and understanding basic concepts like laws.
People are getting way too excited over this because the likelihood of anything ever actually being done in regards to this is slim to nil.
It's too late now to get the courts to declare Biden was not mentally fit to be President. For them to be able to make that ruling, they would need actual evidence in the form of clinical cognitive/neurological exams performed by trained professionals such as psychiatrists, psychologists, and neurologists done while he was President.
As far as I'm aware, there are no such assessments done while he was in office showing he was not mentally fit. Simply making claims and theorizing is not going to influence any court to invalidate the actions of a previous president.
You think they're capable of making a clone or hiring a replacement that fooled 99% of the people, but they couldn't find someone that could consistently fake a signature?
Out of all the things I've seemed claimed about this topic, this one just takes the cake.
Millions of school kids all over the country can consistently and reliably forge their parents signatures, but one of the biggest conspiracies to be (kind of) pulled off in the history of US politics can't do the same thing?
Not sure you understood my point there.