2
JustSayIt 2 points ago +2 / -0

Best mod.

I almost fell for this and woke up my dad. He's been praying for this pardon for months.

5
JustSayIt 5 points ago +5 / -0

I've gotten almost no work done all week.

1
JustSayIt 1 point ago +1 / -0

Too bad Britain had to get rid of their army to fund socialized healthcare. Kek

by Evspra
5
JustSayIt 5 points ago +5 / -0

Kek.

1
JustSayIt 1 point ago +1 / -0

Anyone who believes that is a realistic possibility has been gas-lit by fake news. Even if hundreds of thousands of armed patriots were going to storm DC, the military wouldn't fight back, because it would be a massacre and everyone would lose.

2
JustSayIt 2 points ago +5 / -3

Upvoted for making an effort, but I just don't buy it.

They control everything and have all the power already. They don't need to invest that amount of resources purely for optics. They have already convinced the masses that they won and have demoralized most of the right.

I don't believe so much would be invested into logistics and deployment of military operations, unless there was a clear reason that command thought it would be necessary.

1
JustSayIt 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not sure why you marked this post NSFW, but you shouldn't do that, because NSFW is hidden for most people by default unless they manually enable it in their profile.

1
JustSayIt 1 point ago +1 / -0

Then what? You think the pussies on the left are gonna stand up, form a militia that is stronger than the military, and fight back against them? The right owns most of the 400 million civilian firearms in America, and blue states have the most restrictive firearm laws.

Optics are the reason why Trump was voted in and tried doing things via legal channels in the first place. They brought this on themselves.

11
JustSayIt 11 points ago +11 / -0

They shouldn't be able to. Just think through the situation logically.

Can you come up with even a single remotely plausible explanation for why 25k+ troops would be needed in DC?

If you can, I'd love to hear it. If not, you have no reason to doubt what is coming.

3
JustSayIt 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's not the only thing that's BOOMing right now.

6
JustSayIt 6 points ago +6 / -0

I wish I spent more time on Voat over the last year. I was a regular for years and didn't expect it to one day just be gone. Never thought I'd miss being called a ni**erfaggot so much. RIP.

2
JustSayIt 2 points ago +2 / -0

I can't recall exactly where I saw that mentioned earlier today, but I think it was from the military themselves and I didn't have reason to doubt the source, especially since 25k was already widely confirmed. There are now reports that it's up to 40k, but I have no idea where that comes from.

3
JustSayIt 3 points ago +3 / -0

I've never been a Q-believer. I am a pragmatic rationalist. The way I see it, this is the most likely outcome. There is no other remotely plausible reason for 25k+ troops being deployed to DC.

Unless of course you're retarded enough to not only believe in the fantasy of a massive threat from violent far-right extremists, but also believe that the threat is so large that you need even 5% of the deployed troops to deal with it. Already deployed police have been sufficient to deal with much larger threats.

Time to start shitting yourself.

31
JustSayIt 31 points ago +31 / -0

Why would the elected president whom most of the world seems to acknowledge is the new POTUS, need to take control of the country by force?

8
JustSayIt 8 points ago +8 / -0

That's a non-starter narrative. I'm no expert, but from what I understand, it's normal operating procedure to not have a magazine in your weapon when you are on standby.

21
JustSayIt 21 points ago +21 / -0

The far-left media likes to fuck with the color balance to make him look more orange, and RSBN was re-streaming another feed.

63
JustSayIt 63 points ago +63 / -0

Because they are the FBI, who are corrupt traitors? I doubt they can remove enough troops fast enough to make any meaningful difference.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›