1
JustADirk 1 point ago +1 / -0

Mine is showing that as well and it says "as of 12/31/1899". So what is that date? Significant?

Looks like that date tends to be used as a default or null value. Maybe this is a technical quirk or something.

Mine is reporting correctly again now.

2
JustADirk 2 points ago +2 / -0

I thought it was "says a me" as in "so says I". In this article they talk about how this is an "incantation" to open the cave and...well sort of...? The people playing the parts are speaking English with an accent. The leader or whoever gives the command at the cave entrance was actually probably just yelling to someone to open it like any gate and because English is "not his first language" he command "Open! Says a me!" Because he's the leader but it just sounds like "open sesame!" 😆

Here's a real world example, go talk to anyone who speaks English as a second language and ask them to say something. A Puerto Rican says "thanks" like "tanks". Koreans say "high five" like "haipiebuh". Asians saying "lululemon" could have you thinking they're casting spells!

"Sesame" = "says a me" because Arab is ESL speaking English and has an accent.

I do like the magic stuff and all that. This feels like a troll post though 😆

3
JustADirk 3 points ago +3 / -0

Indeed. Almost like how the media hates on specific people that appear to be trying to...change things for the better. /gasp

3
JustADirk 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yeah, maybe some acquisitions :) I think GME is a weapon and like we saw people bending the knee to Trump we will see more and more of these companies doing the same. Maybe even buying into GME is the sign they have joined. Either join or be destroyed.

2
JustADirk 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah I'm in there reading the tin :)

6
JustADirk 6 points ago +8 / -2

Interesting development. Looks like superstonk had the lead on this one way out. Looking forward to see how the sovereign wealth fund stuff can tie into this whole thing.

US Gov backs bitcoin via sovereign wealth fund and Gamestop invests in bitcoin. Sounds like an interesting play.

4
JustADirk 4 points ago +4 / -0

This seems like a pattern with these people. Seriously like an infestation.

1
JustADirk 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah, sign language is speech. This act most certainly would not fall under that.

It really doesn't matter that the sign said what it said. She was just standing there holding it. It's not the speech we agree with that needs to be protected, it's the speech we don't. She is a good example of American values by attempting to exercise her right to freedom of speech however it's been infringed in front of everyone.

He should apologize to her and instead of getting physical with her "present a better idea" or whatever we say. What that looks like is a man bullying a woman colleague and theft. I highly doubt if it had been a man holding that sign he'd have snatched it like that. The optics for this are terrible. Additionally, when he tossed it in the air as it came down it almost hit President Trump. Imagine how that would've looked.

Lastly, they use the same logic to justify these same types of actions and we rightly call foul. Now "our side" is doing it, that's a great example to set!

2
JustADirk 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well, protesting doesn't mean it's a disturbance or disrespectful. I assume that's why she didn't get ejected for her speech alongside the other people that held up signs in silent protest vs the guy that did stand up and started yelling got ejected. So decorum is something but I don't think that's justification here. Additionally, he is not in the job of enforcing decorum. It appears he just didn't like what the sign said and in that situation he should've just delt with it. Not to mention he almost hit Trump with the sign when he tossed it. To me, the sign was not different than any of the other signs the dems had.

And no, him grabbing her sign was not an act of his speech. Could try to argue it but the "grabbing" part might be a difficult hurdle to overcome.

2
JustADirk 2 points ago +2 / -0

I get the sentiment but didn't he just infringe on her right to free speech? I'd like to know how this differs from if she was outside protesting against abortion and he came up and took her sign. I saw a video like that and the person that took the sign got arrested.

3
JustADirk 3 points ago +3 / -0

Possible connection to GME. Post on r/Superstonk. Titled "T minus 21 days estimated until earnings" thought "what a coincidence" 🤔

9 million debt ( According to recent data, the average debt per S&P 500 company is around $9.3 billion)

4.6 billion cash on hand or more; Nearest competitors ; Best Buy reported $643 million in cash and equivalents for the fiscal quarter ending in November 2024 ; According to recent financial reports, Target currently has around $3.43 billion in cash on hand. According to Walmart's latest earnings release, they currently have approximately $9.9 billion in cash and cash equivalents.

Continued overhead reduction( will see exact store footprint reduction with earnings filing).

Possibly best quarterly earnings in 7+ years in roughly 21 days...

This is the only HYPE date I need

Additionally this could be really huge due to the speculation that Ryan Cohen has invested the GME warchest $4.6 billion into bitcoin. With Donald Trump announcing the crypto reserve and bitcoin as a reserve currency this could tie the price of the shares to US government confidence which would make it a very nice investment. This could potentially form the base for a new financial system. GME earnings (21 days) will be a perfect time to announce something like this.

view more: Next ›