committed treason? You got something up your ass.
Is not this the patent he was talking about? is that a coincidence or what?
YES.
He said a few years ago that "The NWO worships Satan."
Trump for 2024 just about says it all.
Don't know what you guys are talking about.
You guys are rather cynical and naive.
I believe that people need to see this video. If you disagree fine, speak freely but don't impugn people just because you disagree with them.
How this is "shill" stuff I don't know.
You are blackpillers who are more concerned about your own agenda within all this than just people speaking and thinking freely.
Shove your egos back up your butts where they belong and don't stand in other people's light.
Embarrassing that you call yourself a "digital soldier". We're not playing with GI Joe action figures here.
I've never seen a real digital soldier so small minded.
Don't know what you guys are talking about.
You guys are rather cynical and naive.
I believe that people need to see this video. If you disagree fine, speak freely but don't impugn people just because you disagree with them.
How this is "shill" stuff I don't know.
You are blackpillers who are more concerned about your own agenda within all this than just people speaking and thinking freely.
Shove your egos back up your butts where they belong and don't stand in other people's light.
Embarrassing that you call yourself a "digital soldier". We're not playing with GI Joe action figures here.
I've never seen a real digital soldier so small minded.
ghostezra at gab said this is day 6 of darkness at the WH.
Sounds like 10 days darkness is also about lights out at the WH and lights on the "viewing structure' in front of it.
lolol, now I know why I don't know anything about him.
Thorn in the side of the Deep State? Not so sure.
Looks can be deceiving. She might just be bait.
Yes, she's a member of the CFR....
https://www.cfr.org/election2020/candidate-tracker/tulsi-gabbard
She also has a strange background in some cult no?
http://www.hawaiifreepress.com/Articles-Main/ID/20540/New-Yorker-Expose-Tulsi-Gabbards-Krishna-Cult
that's a good find.
I see the ban has limited your ability to post.
Tragic.
There is something technically called the "doomsday plane" this is not that.
This is a high level long rang B52 Bomber which is now headed for the Middle East.
There are claims that tensions between Israel/Saudi and Iran are at a peak and the possibility of war exists.
Perhaps its going in as reinforcements to the region as deterrence.
Not hard to figure out why.
The specter of ... would be invoked.
same stuff that's been circulating for some time.
The kraken is a apparently a military supercomputer that tallied the actual votes in real time because they all had special radioactive isotope watermarks that allowed them to be tracked. This apparently was what Trump/Team were monitoring on the night of the election.
I'm not sure there ever was a delay. Whispers out there that everything is under control.
The only "delay" is that things didn't happen when people wanted them to.
But if you see that Bidan is not the actual Joe Biden, but a fake, you realize that it was their plan all along to have a "Bidan" Presidency.
This flipped the optics, took the lights off Trump and put them on BIdan. Now everything that he does and that happens is on him and on his watch.
This is called brass balls.
In Maricopa and I think Michigan they had military level computer analysts in the room with these machines for something like 7-12 hours to do diagnostics on them.
They've already got a lot of data. God knows why it never saw the light of day in any context prior to Jan 6 & 20.
I've thought about this and it is quite possible.
There are few simple explanation of why Trump is still president.
The most basic is that the Miltiary stepped in because no other branch did, and disqualified Biden because of election fraud. Once disqualified the election would go to the remaining legal candidate with the most electoral votes.
The other way, similarly, is martial law was declared, the entire election was voided and Trump simply remains in office until Martial Law is lifted and real elections can be had.
Trump may well be a shadow president.
Bannon says he is not a Q guy or a conspiracy guy, but then has been Flogging a "Great Awakening" for months without even specifying what this means.
For example he keeps saying "Ok guys we're not gonna talk about gun battles in Frankfurt" but in doing so he keeps talking about it, raising the issue, almost every show.
He's playing a game, he has his reasons for not associating himself with Q, but that does not mean he's not on board.
This is an age old rhetorical strategy of a public denial non-denial.
Many people sympathetic to Q have done quasi public disavowals of Q.
He has Jack Posobiec on every other day.
Remember when Jack "exposed" who Q was and that it was a fraud in I think 2018?????
we just want to "wake up" to accurate and well sourced information about this transformation in our government.
I think for most of us, if we just looked at the facts vs. the claim of a new USA INC we would not be able to derived from the facts at hand the conclusion that it created this USA INC and a second constitution.
Perhaps the best place to start is the Missing 13th Amendment which is a topic acknowledged by Constitutional Scholar.
Interestingly it said that any US citizen who takes a takes a title of nobility from another country (read England) forfeits their US citizenship. So it basically forbade taking foreign titles of nobility by US Citizens which is different from the Constitution's provision that the US government will not themselves issue titles of nobility, ie. they will not exist in the USA.
Ok so I hear talk of this regularly now.
Show us the 2 constitutions? Show us the differences other than the claim of a Constitution "of" rather than "for" the States.
Show us how the organic act of 1871 establishes all this, USA Corp and so on.
If you've ever looked at that piece of legislation, which I have, you realize that it is so legalistic that you need a decoder ring to determine what it really says.
It may say exactly what people claim, but you need to have expertise to demonstrate this and I've never seen the demonstration.
I am totally onboard with the possibility and plausibility of this and its long term concealment from the public.
I've heard of lots of in depth explanations of how it all works, 3 city states, admiralty law and on and on, but NO concrete proof whatsoever.
This stuff about the distinction between a Constitution "for" vs. "of" the States does not wash with the proceedings of the Constitutional Convention(s) and all the history of the establishment of the original republican Constitution.
The Constitution did not establish a league or confederacy of states, it established a NEW NATION, not based on the authority of the states but on the sovereignty of THE PEOPLE. It obviously required state institutions to pass it, but the Convention asserted that the authority of the Constitution was drawn from the sovereignty of the people, explicitly and self-consciously bypassing state sovereignty. This is all grade school stuff really.
The thing that established a confederacy of states in which the primary sovereign entities were states, was the Articles of Confederation which everyone knows were superseded by the Constitution. This meant national sovereignty trumped state sovereignty and it derived from the people, not the states.
THIS ISSUE WAS MUCH DEBATED AT THE CONVENTION AND WAS A MAJOR BONE OF CONTENTION. IT WAS ALL VERY PUBLIC.
Those critical of the original Constitution, The Anti-Federalists like Patrick Henry, made JUST this criticism. He said effectively "Who is this "We The People" who authorize this document when it is clear that it is "We the States?!"
So there may be truth to this USA Inc , but there is also some bad history surrounding it.
MIke, gives a good overall commentary here. He doesn't draw on far out claims that cannot be confirmed.
However he contradicts himself on a key point. On one had he said the military do not recognized Bidan as legit, and that they will wait strategically to remove him only when his polls drop.
Is Biden really at 48% now?
Then he said on the other that if Biden does the right things by the country he said "the military would NEVER move against him." ... That does not compute.
First I think more Americans trust the military than the pols or the media. That's something both parties agree on.
If he's not a Constitutional pres. the military has a duty to remove him regardless of polls.
Lastly, if a few choice documents and pictures are declassified and pumped out by the EBS, his polls will plummet over night.
I agree. He contradicted himself. He said on the one hand the military do not recognized Bidan as legit, and that they will wait strategically to remove him only when his polls drop.
Is Biden really at 48% now?
Then he said if Biden does the right things by the country they will not remove him.... If he's not a Constitutional pres. they have a duty to remove him regardless of polls.
Lastly, if a few choice documents and pictures are declassified and pumped out by the EBS, his polls will plummet over night.
These strange photo ops with people surrounding Biden as he signs EO's unrelated to their administrative specialities makes no sense at all.
These look more like hostage videos of people currently under arrest who are forced to play a role as part of their deal.
For skeptics I give you an new article from today on the patent he was talking about.
I guess there are coincidences.
Blackpillers and crybabies go and suck your thumbs.
https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/38937/navy-ufo-patent-documents-talk-of-spacetime-modification-weapon-detail-experimental-testing