I like the part where you projected the "changing subject" thing onto other people, when I read this whole "conversation" and you're the only one doing that (and ignoring/failing to address people's questions that have been asked about 5 times already). REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEDDIT
"YoU ObViOsLy DiDn'T ReAd iT" - why? Because I understood it correctly?
It doesn't say that. I did read it. I've seen the chart about drowning and nick cage movies, and cheese and bed sheets a million times... always from a leftist.
Those comparisons are STRAWMAN in nature.
If the chart was "the number of houses nick cage was at while someone drowned in his literal presense", or "the amount of cheese eaten in a bed with a sheet wrapped around your face" it would be more akin to the actual situation here, where you're trying to apply this brainlet non-argument.
I "cuss" because it s a great way to express yourself at the correct time.
I call people leftists when they behave as such, likewise a shill, when they behave as such. Apparently that's not OK, unless you're doing it... hypocrite.
Parroting "correlation is not causation" is also speculation, and isn't critical thinking. It's designed to immediately turn the user into a negative associative state of thinking.
Correlation isn't ALWAYS causation, but it certainly CAN BE and HAS BEEN on many numerous occasions.
Blanket statements suggesting that it's "not" are leftist methods of "explaining things the right way, so you can understand them the right way".
Well, if you ever had any doubt about this guy... now's the time to see him for what he really is. He's glowing hard AF now. They're getting desperate.