WOW - an appendix of Adverse effects of their Vaccine - 9 pages - crap I am in the medical field and struggled knowing what 1/2 of them are on just the first page!
Yep. I’m not in the medical field, but I’m fascinated with human physiology and so been studying for years. A LOT of this list is autoimmune in nature, even if it isn’t called as such.
I’m convinced that vaccines cause autoimmune conditions, not just these experimental injections, but ALL vaccines. We are totally fucking up people’s immune systems permanently. It appears there are some folks who have genetic predisposition toward injury. Looks like Russian Roulette to me.
Also, I don’t believe that every single issue on this list can be attributed to the injection....the Deja Vu for example 😂
these are pages of small print, tight line spacing, and the terms are one after another on the lines. it is a wall of text that goes on for pages and pages.
No, I need the line that proves this exact statement by u/zeitreise:
Each x-hit of VAERS DATA -> CONFIRMED SIDE EFFECT = 1 INSTANCE
That is foundational for his argument. If he can't prove that this is supported by the document, then his argument can't really proceed from there without admitting he's making assumptions unsupported by the source.
The source, in fact, says he is wrong. On page six:
An accumulation of adverse event reports (AERs) does not necessarily indicate that a particular AE was caused by the drug; rather, the event may be due to an underlying disease or some other factor(s) such as past medical history or concomitant medication.
This sentence is VITAL context for the data you're looking at.
"This data shows that bad things happened after the drug. We do not know which of these, if any, was definitely caused by the vaccine. People get sick all the time, and verifying whether this was actually a vaccine injury or not would require context we do not usually have."
Broken down further:
"You're going to see a shit-ton of scary symptoms here in the data. For any report of those symptoms, there's somewhere between a 0% and 100% that the report shows an actual vaccine issue and not just random medical bullshit. If you want to know for sure, then you'll need to check with the patient, because we don't know."
Which means, that no, you cannot say each adverse "instance" was actually a vaccine injury event. Because it's clearly stated that the data does not represent verified vaccine injuries, and nobody knows yet how much of this might just be random medical bullshit. These databases don't carry that information.
They're just a tip line for things that DID happen that might, maybe, possibly be connected in some way to the vaccine.
Essentially, it's just a a simple correlation/causation error. You cannot assume causation based on correlation, and these databases are incapable of proving causation. Therefore, you can't use the data to prove ANYTHING about vaccine injury. That is done by further studies that are based on the data from databases like these.
A doctor said a person got sick, and believes it is related to the vaccine.
For VAERS? No. A doctor does not have to believe it's related to the vaccine to be required to report it to VAERS. A doctor just has to be completely unable to empirically rule out the vaccine. So, if it's not a gunshot to the face, then a doctor could viably HAVE to report it to VAERS. That's by design.
The point of an adverse event database is not to prove that adverse events are connected to vaccines. It's to establish a tip-line that gives medical researchers an idea of where they should be looking at variations above the baseline of garbage data.
I strangely agree with your overall argument, reddit slut. Correlation indeed does not equate causation NECESSARILY.
However, from what I learned in my Psychology Statistics courses, strong correlations are specifically measured to discover their respective measures of reliability and validity.
And therefore an enormous reason why these public health institutions CANT be trusted is because they outright refuse to explore in depth much less acknowledge the statistically significant amount of VAERS adverse events that occur after these covid vaccines.
And with the long track record of these SAME big Pharma companies of choosing to place their profit margins over their product safety, you would be a naive fool would outright ignore this very valid, irrefutable fact.
Strong correlations are important. They are not to be disregarded. In a statistics class, you tend to be given data specifically curated to illustrate workable correlations.
However, as you already know, real-world correlations have a lot more confounding factors than any classroom project, and correlations are therefore going to exist between an infinite number of things that are only remotely related to one another.
When you look at VAERS, you see a lot of bad things happening, and you think, "There is a significant number of bad things happening to vaccinated people."
But are there?
For instance, nothing bad has happened to me, and I was vaccinated earlier than almost anyone. I was boostered in October. I've had no problems, no symptoms, nothing.
I am not represented in VAERS. I have not submitted any reports. Nothing has been submitted about me. I do not exist in the data set.
Nor do any of my coworkers. Or my family. Or my friends. Or honestly, anyone I know. Nobody had anything worse than a shitty flu-like weekend and a sore arm, and even that was rare. None of us are in VAERS, because we're all fine.
So how exactly are you establishing a correlation of bad things happening to vaccinated people by looking at a database where the only population being studied are vaccinated people who have had bad things happen to them?
That would be like me creating a database documenting violence perpetrated by Q supporters, and then assuming that Q people are fucking nuts because I'm getting a bunch of reports of violence submitted by people who thought the perpetrator was kind of Q'y looking.
Assume nobody lied in my database, and most or all submissions were simply wrong about the bad guy being associated with Q. There's no fraud. Just incorrect assumptions.
My database doesn't show that. It only shows SUSPECTED cases of Q-related violence. It's a tip line for me to investigate, nothing more. Nothing's verified.
So would it be viable to say, "this database that only collects unverified reports of Q-related violence shows a strong correlation between Q beliefs and violence"? Or would that seem like a completely unfounded way of understanding the data?
Known adverse effects is not the same thing as proven vaccine injury. Adverse effects are merely reported after a vaccine. They are not proven to be caused by the vaccine.
VAERS states this. This report states this on page 6.
Again, your assumptions are hamstringing your validity as a claimed data scientist.
Doctors have to report every symptom that happens after a vaccine to VAERS.
So a 98 year old alcoholic who dies of liver failure a week after the vaccine? That's going in as a death in VAERS.
Nobody lied. Nobody committed fraud. But the vaccine didn't kill that person, even though it's in VAERS.
VAERS DEMANDS to have ALL symptoms that occur. Even ones that are absolutely not the vaccine. Not a single report is verified to have anything to do with the vaccine before it's listed in VAERS.
Because no report is verified, and EVERY symptom after EVERY vaccine is supposed to be reported, then yes, it's entirely possible that not a single report in VAERS or in this Pfizer report was caused by the vaccine. The system would, by design, be absolutely flooded with garbage data.
Every adverse reaction database works this way. They work like police tip lines. We don't assume we have 10,000 identical criminals just because one tip line got 10,000 tips. Many of those people were just wrong.
Changing the subject again when asked simply and directly to provide empirical evidence if your claims. This is a pattern. Which is why I’ve been engaging with you less.
It is immensely easier to put on the persona of expertise and intelligence by implying that empirically proving even a single one of your claims or establishing falsifiable premises is beneath you.
You’re like the third poster in this site’s history that has tried this strategy. It gets less effective when people see the avoidance pattern, and that’s hard to hide on a site full of pattern-seers.
Page 30 lists adverse events reported to the database. Adverse events are not established as proven vaccine injuries, just events that occurred in some period after a vaccination. This is the same as VAERS.
See page 5-6.
You cannot look at a list of adverse events reported spontaneously to the database and empirically deduce that each adverse event correlates directly to a confirmed vaccine injury.
You can make assumptions, but so can I, and that is not empirical.
Please quote the part of the report that confirms the assertion you made. So far, I can only see you relying on an assumption of how this data must correlate with vaccine injury, and refusing to demonstrate any empirical basis for that assumption by claiming that you’re just way smarter than me.
Perhaps you are. But for the benefit of your peers, who tend to hate fake researchers who make up bullshit to fit their narrative and lord their intelligence over everyone when questioned, can you lay out the mathematical basis of these assumptions?
I can understand where you are coming from, but I would like to make a broader point about truth communities like ours.
The broad goal here is NOT to prove beyond reasonable doubt to every single person that what we claim is true. Thats beyond the scope of any human being.
The broad goal is to provide enough information to make people ask themselves "am I perhaps being lied to?". This question needs to come from each person, because only when they reach this point will they actually open their minds to the truth.
You haven't reached that point, unfortunately. Hopefully you will, in the days/weeks to come.
The broad goal here is NOT to prove beyond reasonable doubt to every single person that what we claim is true. Thats beyond the scope of any human being.
The broad goal is to provide enough information to make people ask themselves "am I perhaps being lied to?". This question needs to come from each person, because only when they reach this point will they actually open their minds to the truth.
Many people faint after being around needles. I can't base any sort of assumption merely on seeing evidence of people falling down after being sticked with a needle. It happens literally every day in every doctor's office around the world.
Be careful here, though. "Associated" does NOT mean "caused by" or even "significantly related to." It means, "there is some relationship between a thing happening and another thing happening."
In VAERS, for instance, that means, "a vaccine was administered, and then a bad thing happened."
That's the association. That adverse event could be that you develop cancer, or die, or that your fingernails get darker, or penis falls off.
The adverse event can be caused by ANYTHING, but has to happen after the vaccine. That's the association. Once that association is established, we can then try to verify whether or not the vaccine actually DID cause that adverse event, or if the adverse event was due to something else.
VAERS does not do that. VAERS is a database of reported adverse events, not confirmed vaccine injuries.
You use VAERS data to figure out where you look for potential vaccine injuries.
Which says that it is a list of adverse events, not confirmed vaccine reactions. There is a world of difference between the two. Adverse events can be from literally anything. They just happened after the vaccine. It’s not considered a vaccine injury unless it gets verified in context.
Neither VAERS nor this report is listing vaccine injuries. It lists adverse events following vaccination that could have been from one of a million things, and serve as a starting point for medical investigators. There could be three total legitimate cases in this report, and we have no way of knowing which ones they are by looking at this data.
What you are saying is simply not true. Adverse events if severe enough constitute injury. I think you need to define 'vaccine injury' before you continue. There is no listing in a PI regarding 'injury'... they fall under Adverse Events (this includes Infections / Serious Adverse Events and Death)
All medications approved by the FDA have this information, and its robust, and long term. It's Trial Safety Data.
You are trying to say injury is different than Adverse Events, which is ridiculous.
This Adverse Events following these mRNA jabs is something we have never seen before, they are endless. And this isn't even long term Safety Data. VAERS only verifies this.
So I ask you, define vaccine injury in relation to Adverse Events.
I'm not suggesting an adverse reaction has to hit some threshold of severity to count.
A vaccine injury is ALWAYS an adverse event. But an adverse event is not necessarily a vaccine injury.
If I get a vaccine, and then two days later, I have a stomach ache, that is DEFINITIONALLY an adverse event. I can submit it to VAERS. Once it's there, you will think that proves that vaccines cause stomach aches.
In truth, I had the stomach ache because I drank a lot of alcohol and am hungover, and am too stupid to make the connection. I just reported it as a random stomach ache after I got the vaccine.
I did not commit fraud by misattributing my stomach ache. I did what VAERS wanted me to do.
The stomach ache is an adverse event.
The stomach ache is not a vaccine injury.
They are two different terms for a reason.
VAERS records adverse events. It does not record vaccine injuries. That can only be done by verifying adverse events as being caused by vaccine injuries, which VAERS does not do.
If the database is not verifying which reports are from the vaccine and which are not, then you can't use that data to make conclusions about how bad the vaccine is.
VAERS is a reported system that monitors Adverse Events, to include Injury (if the Adverse Event is severe enough). They are not two different terms, you are making them two different terms. I asked you to define 'injury', and you did not, because injury is subjective. A severe stomach ache to someone could be considered injury, but in clinical trials the term is not used, because its subjective.
The real safety data come from clinical trials which uses placebo. Through short and long term safety data (compared against placebo) compared to VAERS data we can get a better understanding of the 'SAFETY' of a medication, short and long term.
Okay, look. I'm going to give you made-up VAERS data. Let's say these five cases all happen a week after vaccination. Broken down, this is what VAERS would show:
Death
Paralysis
Blue tongue
Heart inflammation
Death
These are adverse events. These five things actually happened after the vaccination. These things would be shown in VAERS.
At this point, the Q crowd is done. They conclude that the vaccine must have caused two cases of death, paralysis, heart inflammation, and a blue tongue, since these were listed as adverse events.
BUT THAT IS INCORRECT.
I, a medical researcher, am going to take that VAERS data, and I'm going to investigate the fuck out of every case. I come back with the following causes for the adverse events:
Liver failure by alcoholism.
Stroke related to vascular EDS.
Ate a pixie stick and forgot.
Lasted for three days, required one day of hospitalization, full recovery
Aortic aneurysm.
Well, guess what? These are STILL adverse events! They still happened after the vaccination!
But we know they have nothing to do with the vaccine. They are NOT vaccine injuries.
Adverse events are correlation. Vaccine injuries are causation.
If you accept VAERS data as indicative of vaccine injury, you're making a correlation/causation logical fallacy, and VAERS itself will tell you this.
When evaluating data from VAERS, it is important to note that for any reported event, no cause-and-effect relationship has been established. Reports of all possible associations between vaccines and adverse events (possible side effects) are filed in VAERS. Therefore, VAERS collects data on any adverse event following vaccination, be it coincidental or truly caused by a vaccine. The report of an adverse event to VAERS is not documentation that a vaccine caused the event.
I concur. I worked in heart medication clinical drug trials and we had to report EVERY SINGLE symptom, no matter what. Your example if the stomach ache is perfect.
What you can do is start correlating in retrospect how many had a stomach ache, how soon after, what comirbidities were common, etc ...
And such studies already exist. One compared the myocarditis rarely associated with vaccination with non-vaccine myocarditis found "in nature."
They found that while regular viral myocarditis is typically a big deal, myocarditis following vaccination is usually very mild. This makes sense: heart inflammation is a response to viral infection, and vaccines are very weak viruses, so it's a much weaker response.
So when they did the comparison, they found that the problems resolved more quickly and more quickly. Viral myocarditis is unpredictable and can require a heart transplant, but the sample studied with vaccine-related myocarditis were able to get through it quickly with only painkillers.
The problem isn't whether these correlations are being actively studied and established. It's whether or not people will trust that research enough to change their mind on taking a vaccine they're convinced will kill them.
Great red pill EXCEPT I can't find a mention of the original source, other than PHMPT. It shows up in lots of web searches but just on PHMPT and random blog sites.
Is there an official source link for the document, from FDA or CDC or something?
Sauce needed or people will just dismiss it as phony.
You will require someone with PACER subscription to access the full docs.
I think given the entity filing the FOIA is providing these documents, its a safe point to make that the documents they are providing is authentic unless you can show history of fraud on their part.
I don't have time right now to hunt down a more 'official' source, but it is the same document that was out in January and here is a link to Reuters, who confirmed it's validity by referencing it and (of course) fact checking certain claims about it. Reuters showed it to the fda to back up their argument about public claims of spontaneous abortions.
I can't tell you how many people I have heard about who have gotten their legs cleaned out recently this year... including my own sister who took both jabs at least.
No wonder they wanted 50 - 75 years before having to release the information. Most of the generation that took the jab would be dead (either by natural causes or prematurely) from the clot shot!
Holy shit. This is from february of 2021. Before the vaccines were even widely available. And that is the most frightening list of adverse events I have ever seen. What the fuck…
You really have to read through all the pages before the adverse reactions. And honestly I think it doesn't matter. The numbers are so vast while they acknowledge reporting is voluntary...this should have never seen light of day.
Deletion syndrome is a disorder that involves many different areas of the body and can vary greatly in severity among people with the condition. Signs and symptoms may include: cleft palate, heart defects, recurrent infections, unique facial characteristics, feeding problems, kidney abnormalities, hypoparathyroidism, thrombocytopenia, scoliosis, hearing loss, developmental delay, and learning disabilities. People with this condition are also more likely to develop certain autoimmune disorders and personality disorders. 22q11.2 deletion syndrome is caused by a deletion of a small part of chromosome 22 near the middle of the chromosome at a location known as q11.2.
Uh guys this is the same document from the previous release in December, I just compared it to the one I already have. This is not a new release and I haven't found the new documents that were supposed to be released this week yet.
Don’t forget pfizer unblinded the trials almost immediately so the true impact will likely never be known. What we see as horrible as it is doesn’t likely reflect the true impact.
Many of these reactions are typically FATAL and many are IRREVERSABLE.
Ruminating fuckery working it's evil until you become sick. If you took this shit, the real shit; sooner or later you're going to be a lifelong customer.
Probably just as sick, is the sad truth that most of the normies that pushed this crap or took it themselves could not care less.
Let's break this down so that every crayon eating moron can understand the bigger point, the ONLY point that truly matters... "the fox knows many things, but the hedgehog knows one big thing."
What the hedgehog knows: the propaganda machine lied and continues to lie about the possibility (at the very least) of harm caused by the various drugs (not really vaccines, but when you change the definitions of words... I digress) they claim are so safe, based on their testing that didn't face anywhere near the level of scrutiny normally required for pharmacudical treatments, OR AT THE VERY LEAST the ineffectiveness of the drug, which they claim[ed] to be so incredibly effective.
Claim: "drug is safe and effective."
Evidence based observed reality:
While not always a 100% provable correlation, there are indicators suggesting possible reaction and/or injury caused by said drug. An immunization should render the person IMMUNE. They should experience no effect from the virus. None. That's literally the definition of immunity. And yet, MORE people tested positive and experienced symptoms after the vax push than prior to it. More symptoms. More cases. More deaths. Where are all the people getting polio? So because reality is not in sync with the promise, doubt rises. Controllers cannot lose grip over minds. So they change the narrative, move the goal posts, redefine words, claim "NeW VaRiAnTs". And some retards will still continue to believe the lies because the come from authority figures..
Test subject: "Are you sure it's ok to keep shocking him? His screams (evidence) sounds like he's in pain."
Authority: "Oh yes. He's fine. That's just a natural side effect. He really should get the answers right. He'll eventually figure out he should try harder to get the right answers so he won't get shocked."
Test subject: "He's not making noises anymore, really sure he's ok?"
EDIT: Now it’s available! click the link below and dig anons!
Just an FYI, this is not the new stuff that was supposed to be released today. This is from a release last November.
Hopefully soon!
Eyes on: https://phmpt.org/pfizers-documents/
WOW - an appendix of Adverse effects of their Vaccine - 9 pages - crap I am in the medical field and struggled knowing what 1/2 of them are on just the first page!
Extract for easier read:
1p36 deletion syndrome;
2-Hydroxyglutaric aciduria;
5'nucleotidase increased;
Acoustic neuritis;
Acquired C1 inhibitor deficiency;
Acquired epidermolysis bullosa;
Acquired epileptic aphasia;
Acute cutaneous lupus erythematosus;
Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis;
Acute encephalitis with refractory, repetitive partial seizures;
Acute febrile neutrophilic dermatosis;
Acute flaccid myelitis;
Acute haemorrhagic leukoencephalitis;
Acute haemorrhagic oedema of infancy;
Acute kidney injury;
Acute macular outer retinopathy;
Acute motor axonal neuropathy;
Acute motor-sensory axonal neuropathy;
Acute myocardial infarction;
Acute respiratory distress syndrome;
Acute respiratory failure;
Addison's disease;
Administration site thrombosis;
Administration site vasculitis;
Adrenal thrombosis;
Adverse event following immunisation;
Ageusia;
Agranulocytosis;
Air embolism;
Alanine aminotransferase abnormal;
Alanine aminotransferase increased;
Alcoholic seizure;
Allergic bronchopulmonary mycosis;
Allergic oedema;
Alloimmune hepatitis;
Alopecia areata;
Alpers disease;
Alveolar proteinosis;
Ammonia abnormal;
Ammonia increased;
Amniotic cavity infection;
Amygdalohippocampectomy;
Amyloid arthropathy;
Amyloidosis;
Amyloidosis senile;
Anaphylactic reaction;
Anaphylactic shock;
Anaphylactic transfusion reaction;
Anaphylactoid reaction;
Anaphylactoid shock;
Anaphylactoid syndrome of pregnancy;
Angioedema;
Angiopathic neuropathy;
Ankylosing spondylitis;
Anosmia;
Antiacetylcholine receptor antibody positive;
Anti-actin antibody positive;
Anti-aquaporin-4 antibody positive;
Anti-basal ganglia antibody positive;
Anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody positive;
Anti-epithelial antibody positive;
Anti-erythrocyte antibody positive;
Anti-exosome complex antibody positive;
AntiGAD antibody negative;
Anti-GAD antibody positive;
Anti-ganglioside antibody positive;
Antigliadin antibody positive;
Anti-glomerular basement membrane antibody positive;
Anti-glomerular basement membrane disease;
Anti-glycyl-tRNA synthetase antibody positive;
Anti-HLA antibody test positive;
Anti-IA2 antibody positive;
Anti-insulin antibody increased;
Anti-insulin antibody positive;
Anti-insulin receptor antibody increased;
Antiinsulin receptor antibody positive;
Anti-interferon antibody negative;
Anti-interferon antibody positive;
Anti-islet cell antibody positive;
Antimitochondrial antibody positive;
Anti-muscle specific kinase antibody positive;
Anti-myelin-associated glycoprotein antibodies positive;
Anti-myelin-associated glycoprotein associated polyneuropathy;
Antimyocardial antibody positive;
Anti-neuronal antibody positive;
Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody increased;
Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody positive;
Anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody positive vasculitis;
Anti-NMDA antibody positive;
Antinuclear antibody increased;
Antinuclear antibody positive;
Antiphospholipid antibodies positive;
Antiphospholipid syndrome;
Anti-platelet antibody positive;
Anti-prothrombin antibody positive;
Antiribosomal P antibody positive;
Anti-RNA polymerase III antibody positive;
Anti-saccharomyces cerevisiae antibody test positive;
Anti-sperm antibody positive;
Anti-SRP antibody positive;
Antisynthetase syndrome;
Anti-thyroid antibody positive;
Anti-transglutaminase antibody increased;
Anti-VGCC antibody positive;
AntiVGKC antibody positive;
Anti-vimentin antibody positive;
Antiviral prophylaxis;
Antiviral treatment;
Anti-zinc transporter 8 antibody positive;
Aortic embolus;
Aortic thrombosis;
Aortitis;
Aplasia pure red cell;
Aplastic anaemia;
Application site thrombosis;
Application site vasculitis;
Arrhythmia;
Arterial bypass occlusion;
Arterial bypass thrombosis;
Arterial thrombosis;
Arteriovenous fistula thrombosis;
Arteriovenous graft site stenosis;
Arteriovenous graft thrombosis;
Arteritis;
Arteritis coronary;
Arthralgia;
Arthritis;
Arthritis enteropathic;
Ascites;
Aseptic cavernous sinus thrombosis;
Aspartate aminotransferase abnormal;
Aspartate aminotransferase increased;
Aspartate-glutamate-transporter deficiency;
AST to platelet ratio index increased;
AST/ALT ratio abnormal;
Asthma;
Asymptomatic COVID19;
Ataxia;
Atheroembolism;
Atonic seizures;
Atrial thrombosis;
Atrophic thyroiditis;
Atypical benign partial epilepsy;
Atypical pneumonia;
Aura;
Autoantibody positive;
Autoimmune anaemia;
Autoimmune aplastic anaemia;
Autoimmune arthritis;
Autoimmune blistering disease;
Autoimmune cholangitis;
Autoimmune colitis;
Autoimmune demyelinating disease;
Autoimmune dermatitis;
Autoimmune disorder;
Autoimmune encephalopathy;
Autoimmune endocrine disorder;
Autoimmune enteropathy;
Autoimmune eye disorder;
Autoimmune haemolytic anaemia;
Autoimmune heparin-induced thrombocytopenia;
Autoimmune hepatitis;
Autoimmune hyperlipidaemia;
Autoimmune hypothyroidism;
Autoimmune inner ear disease;
Autoimmune lung disease;
Autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome;
Autoimmune myocarditis;
Autoimmune myositis;
Autoimmune nephritis;
Autoimmune neuropathy;
Autoimmune neutropenia;
Autoimmune pancreatitis;
Autoimmune pancytopenia;
Autoimmune pericarditis;
Autoimmune retinopathy;
Autoimmune thyroid disorder;
Autoimmune thyroiditis;
Autoimmune uveitis;
Autoinflammation with infantile enterocolitis;
Autoinflammatory disease;
Automatism epileptic;
Autonomic nervous system imbalance;
Autonomic seizure;
Axial spondyloarthritis;
Axillary vein thrombosis;
Axonal and demyelinating polyneuropathy;
Axonal neuropathy;
Bacterascites;
Baltic myoclonic epilepsy;
Band sensation;
Basedow's disease;
Basilar artery thrombosis;
Basophilopenia;
B-cell aplasia;
Behcet's syndrome;
Benign ethnic neutropenia;
Benign familial neonatal convulsions;
Benign familial pemphigus;
Benign rolandic epilepsy;
Beta-2 glycoprotein antibody positive;
Bickerstaff's encephalitis;
Bile output abnormal;
Bile output decreased;
Biliary ascites;
Bilirubin conjugated abnormal;
Bilirubin conjugated increased;
Bilirubin urine present;
Biopsy liver abnormal;
Biotinidase deficiency;
Birdshot chorioretinopathy;
Blood alkaline phosphatase abnormal;
Blood alkaline phosphatase increased;
Blood bilirubin abnormal;
Blood bilirubin increased;
Blood bilirubin unconjugated increased;
Blood cholinesterase abnormal;
Blood cholinesterase decreased;
Blood pressure decreased;
Blood pressure diastolic decreased;
Blood pressure systolic decreased;
Blue toe syndrome;
Brachiocephalic vein thrombosis;
Brain stem embolism;
Brain stem thrombosis;
Bromosulphthalein test abnormal;
Bronchial oedema;
Bronchitis;
Bronchitis mycoplasmal;
Bronchitis viral;
Bronchopulmonary aspergillosis allergic;
Bronchospasm;
BuddChiari syndrome;
Bulbar palsy;
Butterfly rash;
C1q nephropathy;
Caesarean section;
Calcium embolism;
Capillaritis;
Caplan's syndrome;
Cardiac amyloidosis;
Cardiac arrest;
Cardiac failure;
Cardiac failure acute;
Cardiac sarcoidosis;
Cardiac ventricular thrombosis;
Cardiogenic shock;
Cardiolipin antibody positive;
Cardiopulmonary failure;
Cardio-respiratory arrest;
Cardio-respiratory distress;
Cardiovascular insufficiency;
Carotid arterial embolus;
Carotid artery thrombosis;
Cataplexy;
Catheter site thrombosis;
Catheter site vasculitis;
Cavernous sinus thrombosis;
CDKL5 deficiency disorder;
CEC syndrome;
Cement embolism;
Central nervous system lupus;
Central nervous system vasculitis;
Cerebellar artery thrombosis;
Cerebellar embolism;
Cerebral amyloid angiopathy;
Cerebral arteritis;
Cerebral artery embolism;
Cerebral artery thrombosis;
Cerebral gas embolism;
Cerebral microembolism;
Cerebral septic infarct;
Cerebral thrombosis;
Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis;
Cerebral venous thrombosis;
Cerebrospinal thrombotic tamponade;
Cerebrovascular accident;
Change in seizure presentation;
Chest discomfort;
ChildPugh-Turcotte score abnormal;
Child-Pugh-Turcotte score increased;
Chillblains;
Choking;
Choking sensation;
Cholangitis sclerosing;
Chronic autoimmune glomerulonephritis;
Chronic cutaneous lupus erythematosus;
Chronic fatigue syndrome;
Chronic gastritis;
Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy;
Chronic lymphocytic inflammation with pontine perivascular enhancement responsive to steroids;
Chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis;
Chronic respiratory failure;
Chronic spontaneous urticaria;
Circulatory collapse;
Circumoral oedema;
Circumoral swelling;
Clinically isolated syndrome;
Clonic convulsion;
Coeliac disease;
Cogan's syndrome;
Cold agglutinins positive;
Cold type haemolytic anaemia;
Colitis;
Colitis erosive;
Colitis herpes;
Colitis microscopic;
Colitis ulcerative;
Collagen disorder;
Collagen-vascular disease;
Complement factor abnormal;
Complement factor C1 decreased;
Complement factor C2 decreased;
Complement factor C3 decreased;
Complement factor C4 decreased;
Complement factor decreased;
Computerised tomogram liver abnormal;
Concentric sclerosis;
Congenital anomaly;
Congenital bilateral perisylvian syndrome;
Congenital herpes simplex infection;
Congenital myasthenic syndrome;
Congenital varicella infection;
Congestive hepatopathy;
Convulsion in childhood;
Convulsions local;
Convulsive threshold lowered;
Coombs positive haemolytic anaemia;
Coronary artery disease;
Coronary artery embolism;
Coronary artery thrombosis;
Coronary bypass thrombosis;
Coronavirus infection;
Coronavirus test;
Coronavirus test negative;
Coronavirus test positive;
Corpus callosotomy;
Cough;
Cough variant asthma;
COVID-19;
COVID-19 immunisation;
COVID-19 pneumonia;
COVID-19 prophylaxis;
COVID-19 treatment;
Cranial nerve disorder;
Cranial nerve palsies multiple;
Cranial nerve paralysis;
CREST syndrome;
Crohn's disease;
Cryofibrinogenaemia;
Cryoglobulinaemia;
CSF oligoclonal band present;
CSWS syndrome;
Cutaneous amyloidosis;
Cutaneous lupus erythematosus;
Cutaneous sarcoidosis;
Cutaneous vasculitis;
Cyanosis;
Cyclic neutropenia;
Cystitis interstitial;
Cytokine release syndrome;
Cytokine storm;
De novo purine synthesis inhibitors associated acute inflammatory syndrome;
Death neonatal;
Deep vein thrombosis;
Deep vein thrombosis postoperative;
Deficiency of bile secretion;
Deja vu;
Demyelinating polyneuropathy;
Demyelination;
Dermatitis;
Dermatitis bullous;
Dermatitis herpetiformis;
Dermatomyositis;
Device embolisation;
Device related thrombosis;
Diabetes mellitus;
Diabetic ketoacidosis;
Diabetic mastopathy;
Dialysis amyloidosis;
Dialysis membrane reaction;
Diastolic hypotension;
Diffuse vasculitis;
Digital pitting scar;
Disseminated intravascular coagulation;
Disseminated intravascular coagulation in newborn;
Disseminated neonatal herpes simplex;
Disseminated varicella;
Disseminated varicella zoster vaccine virus infection;
Disseminated varicella zoster virus infection;
DNA antibody positive;
Double cortex syndrome;
Double stranded DNA antibody positive;
Dreamy state;
Dressler's syndrome;
Drop attacks;
Drug withdrawal convulsions;
Dyspnoea;
Early infantile epileptic encephalopathy with burst-suppression;
Eclampsia;
Eczema herpeticum;
Embolia cutis medicamentosa;
Embolic cerebellar infarction;
Embolic cerebral infarction;
Embolic pneumonia;
Embolic stroke;
Embolism;
Embolism arterial;
Embolism venous;
Encephalitis;
Encephalitis allergic;
Encephalitis autoimmune;
Encephalitis brain stem;
Encephalitis haemorrhagic;
Encephalitis periaxialis diffusa;
Encephalitis post immunisation;
Encephalomyelitis;
Encephalopathy;
Endocrine disorder;
Endocrine ophthalmopathy;
Endotracheal intubation;
Enteritis;
Enteritis leukopenic;
Enterobacter pneumonia;
Enterocolitis;
Enteropathic spondylitis;
Eosinopenia;
Eosinophilic fasciitis;
Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis;
[part 1]
Eosinophilic oesophagitis;
Epidermolysis;
Epilepsy;
Epilepsy surgery;
Epilepsy with myoclonic-atonic seizures;
Epileptic aura;
Epileptic psychosis;
Erythema;
Erythema induratum;
Erythema multiforme;
Erythema nodosum;
Evans syndrome;
Exanthema subitum;
Expanded disability status scale score decreased;
Expanded disability status scale score increased;
Exposure to communicable disease;
Exposure to SARS-CoV-2;
Eye oedema;
Eye pruritus;
Eye swelling;
Eyelid oedema;
Face oedema;
Facial paralysis;
Facial paresis;
Faciobrachial dystonic seizure;
Fat embolism;
Febrile convulsion;
Febrile infection-related epilepsy syndrome;
Febrile neutropenia;
Felty's syndrome;
Femoral artery embolism;
Fibrillary glomerulonephritis;
Fibromyalgia;
Flushing;
Foaming at mouth;
Focal cortical resection;
Focal dyscognitive seizures;
Foetal distress syndrome;
Foetal placental thrombosis;
Foetor hepaticus;
Foreign body embolism;
Frontal lobe epilepsy;
Fulminant type 1 diabetes mellitus;
Galactose elimination capacity test abnormal;
Galactose elimination capacity test decreased;
Gamma-glutamyltransferase abnormal;
Gamma-glutamyltransferase increased;
Gastritis herpes;
Gastrointestinal amyloidosis;
Gelastic seizure;
Generalised onset non-motor seizure;
Generalised tonic-clonic seizure;
Genital herpes;
Genital herpes simplex;
Genital herpes zoster;
Giant cell arteritis;
Glomerulonephritis;
Glomerulonephritis membranoproliferative;
Glomerulonephritis membranous;
Glomerulonephritis rapidly progressive;
Glossopharyngeal nerve paralysis;
Glucose transporter type 1 deficiency syndrome;
Glutamate dehydrogenase increased;
Glycocholic acid increased;
GM2 gangliosidosis;
Goodpasture's syndrome;
Graft thrombosis;
Granulocytopenia;
Granulocytopenia neonatal;
Granulomatosis with polyangiitis;
Granulomatous dermatitis;
Grey matter heterotopia;
Guanase increased;
GuillainBarre syndrome;
Haemolytic anaemia;
Haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis;
Haemorrhage;
Haemorrhagic ascites;
Haemorrhagic disorder;
Haemorrhagic pneumonia;
Haemorrhagic varicella syndrome;
Haemorrhagic vasculitis;
Hantavirus pulmonary infection;
Hashimoto's encephalopathy;
Hashitoxicosis;
Hemimegalencephaly;
Henoch-Schonlein purpura;
HenochSchonlein purpura nephritis;
Hepaplastin abnormal;
Hepaplastin decreased;
Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia;
Hepatic amyloidosis;
Hepatic artery embolism;
Hepatic artery flow decreased;
Hepatic artery thrombosis;
Hepatic enzyme abnormal;
Hepatic enzyme decreased;
Hepatic enzyme increased;
Hepatic fibrosis marker abnormal;
Hepatic fibrosis marker increased;
Hepatic function abnormal;
Hepatic hydrothorax;
Hepatic hypertrophy;
Hepatic hypoperfusion;
Hepatic lymphocytic infiltration;
Hepatic mass;
Hepatic pain;
Hepatic sequestration;
Hepatic vascular resistance increased;
Hepatic vascular thrombosis;
Hepatic vein embolism;
Hepatic vein thrombosis;
Hepatic venous pressure gradient abnormal;
Hepatic venous pressure gradient increased;
Hepatitis;
Hepatobiliary scan abnormal;
Hepatomegaly;
Hepatosplenomegaly;
Hereditary angioedema with C1 esterase inhibitor deficiency;
Herpes dermatitis;
Herpes gestationis;
Herpes oesophagitis;
Herpes ophthalmic;
Herpes pharyngitis;
Herpes sepsis;
Herpes simplex;
Herpes simplex cervicitis;
Herpes simplex colitis;
Herpes simplex encephalitis;
Herpes simplex gastritis;
Herpes simplex hepatitis;
Herpes simplex meningitis;
Herpes simplex meningoencephalitis;
Herpes simplex meningomyelitis;
Herpes simplex necrotising retinopathy;
Herpes simplex oesophagitis;
Herpes simplex otitis externa;
Herpes simplex pharyngitis;
Herpes simplex pneumonia;
Herpes simplex reactivation;
Herpes simplex sepsis;
Herpes simplex viraemia;
Herpes simplex virus conjunctivitis neonatal;
Herpes simplex visceral;
Herpes virus infection;
Herpes zoster;
Herpes zoster cutaneous disseminated;
Herpes zoster infection neurological;
Herpes zoster meningitis;
Herpes zoster meningoencephalitis;
Herpes zoster meningomyelitis;
Herpes zoster meningoradiculitis;
Herpes zoster necrotising retinopathy;
Herpes zoster oticus;
Herpes zoster pharyngitis;
Herpes zoster reactivation;
Herpetic radiculopathy;
Histone antibody positive;
Hoigne's syndrome;
Human herpesvirus 6 encephalitis;
Human herpesvirus 6 infection;
Human herpesvirus 6 infection reactivation;
Human herpesvirus 7 infection;
Human herpesvirus 8 infection;
Hyperammonaemia;
Hyperbilirubinaemia;
Hypercholia;
Hypergammaglobulinaemia benign monoclonal;
Hyperglycaemic seizure;
Hypersensitivity;
Hypersensitivity vasculitis;
Hyperthyroidism;
Hypertransaminasaemia;
Hyperventilation;
Hypoalbuminaemia;
H ypocalcaemic seizure;
Hypogammaglobulinaemia;
Hypoglossal nerve paralysis;
Hypoglossal nerve paresis;
Hypoglycaemic seizure;
Hyponatraemic seizure;
Hypotension;
Hypotensive crisis;
Hypothenar hammer syndrome;
Hypothyroidism;
Hypoxia;
Idiopathic CD4 lymphocytopenia;
Idiopathic generalised epilepsy;
Idiopathic interstitial pneumonia;
Idiopathic neutropenia;
Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis;
IgA nephropathy;
IgM nephropathy;
IIIrd nerve paralysis;
IIIrd nerve paresis;
Iliac artery embolism;
Immune thrombocytopenia;
Immunemediated adverse reaction;
Immune-mediated cholangitis;
Immune-mediated cholestasis;
Immune-mediated cytopenia;
Immune-mediated encephalitis;
Immune-mediated encephalopathy;
Immune-mediated endocrinopathy;
Immune-mediated enterocolitis;
Immunemediated gastritis;
Immune-mediated hepatic disorder;
Immune-mediated hepatitis;
Immunemediated hyperthyroidism;
Immune-mediated hypothyroidism;
Immune-mediated myocarditis;
Immune-mediated myositis;
Immune-mediated nephritis;
Immune-mediated neuropathy;
Immune-mediated pancreatitis;
Immune-mediated pneumonitis;
Immune-mediated renal disorder;
Immune-mediated thyroiditis;
Immune-mediated uveitis;
Immunoglobulin G4 related disease;
Immunoglobulins abnormal;
Implant site thrombosis;
Inclusion body myositis;
Infantile genetic agranulocytosis;
Infantile spasms;
Infected vasculitis;
Infective thrombosis;
Inflammation;
Inflammatory bowel disease;
Infusion site thrombosis;
Infusion site vasculitis;
Injection site thrombosis;
Injection site urticaria;
Injection site vasculitis;
Instillation site thrombosis;
Insulin autoimmune syndrome;
Interstitial granulomatous dermatitis;
Interstitial lung disease;
Intracardiac mass;
Intracardiac thrombus;
Intracranial pressure increased;
Intrapericardial thrombosis;
Intrinsic factor antibody abnormal;
Intrinsic factor antibody positive;
IPEX syndrome;
Irregular breathing;
IRVAN syndrome;
IVth nerve paralysis;
IVth nerve paresis;
JC polyomavirus test positive;
JC virus CSF test positive;
Jeavons syndrome;
Jugular vein embolism;
Jugular vein thrombosis;
Juvenile idiopathic arthritis;
Juvenile myoclonic epilepsy;
Juvenile polymyositis;
Juvenile psoriatic arthritis;
Juvenile spondyloarthritis;
Kaposi sarcoma inflammatory cytokine syndrome;
Kawasaki's disease;
Kayser-Fleischer ring;
Keratoderma blenorrhagica;
Ketosisprone diabetes mellitus;
Kounis syndrome;
Lafora's myoclonic epilepsy;
Lambl's excrescences;
Laryngeal dyspnoea;
Laryngeal oedema;
Laryngeal rheumatoid arthritis;
Laryngospasm;
Laryngotracheal oedema;
Latent autoimmune diabetes in adults;
LE cells present;
Lemierre syndrome;
Lennox-Gastaut syndrome;
Leucine aminopeptidase increased;
Leukoencephalomyelitis;
Leukoencephalopathy;
Leukopenia;
Leukopenia neonatal;
Lewis-Sumner syndrome;
Lhermitte's sign;
Lichen planopilaris;
Lichen planus;
Lichen sclerosus;
Limbic encephalitis;
Linear IgA disease;
Lip oedema;
Lip swelling;
Liver function test abnormal;
Liver function test decreased;
Liver function test increased;
Liver induration;
Liver injury;
Liver iron concentration abnormal;
Liver iron concentration increased;
Liver opacity;
Liver palpable;
Liver sarcoidosis;
Liver scan abnormal;
Liver tenderness;
Low birth weight baby;
Lower respiratory tract herpes infection;
Lower respiratory tract infection;
Lower respiratory tract infection viral;
Lung abscess;
Lupoid hepatic cirrhosis;
Lupus cystitis;
Lupus encephalitis;
Lupus endocarditis;
Lupus enteritis;
Lupus hepatitis;
Lupus myocarditis;
Lupus myositis;
Lupus nephritis;
Lupus pancreatitis;
Lupus pleurisy;
Lupus pneumonitis;
Lupus vasculitis;
Lupus-like syndrome;
Lymphocytic hypophysitis;
Lymphocytopenia neonatal;
Lymphopenia;
MAGIC syndrome;
Magnetic resonance imaging liver abnormal;
Magnetic resonance proton density fat fraction measurement;
Mahler sign;
Manufacturing laboratory analytical testing issue;
Manufacturing materials issue;
Manufacturing production issue;
Marburg's variant multiple sclerosis;
Marchiafava-Bignami disease;
Marine Lenhart syndrome;
Mastocytic enterocolitis;
Maternal exposure during pregnancy;
Medical device site thrombosis;
Medical device site vasculitis;
MELAS syndrome;
Meningitis;
Meningitis aseptic;
Meningitis herpes;
Meningoencephalitis herpes simplex neonatal;
Meningoencephalitis herpetic;
Meningomyelitis herpes;
MERS-CoV test;
MERS-CoV test negative;
MERS-CoV test positive;
Mesangioproliferative glomerulonephritis;
Mesenteric artery embolism;
Mesenteric artery thrombosis;
Mesenteric vein thrombosis;
Metapneumovirus infection;
Metastatic cutaneous Crohn's disease;
Metastatic pulmonary embolism;
Microangiopathy;
Microembolism;
Microscopic polyangiitis;
Middle East respiratory syndrome;
Migraine-triggered seizure;
Miliary pneumonia;
Miller Fisher syndrome;
Mitochondrial aspartate aminotransferase increased;
Mixed connective tissue disease;
Model for end stage liver disease score abnormal;
Model for end stage liver disease score increased;
Molar ratio of total branched-chain amino acid to tyrosine;
Molybdenum cofactor deficiency;
Monocytopenia;
Mononeuritis;
Mononeuropathy multiplex;
Morphoea;
Morvan syndrome;
Mouth swelling;
Moyamoya disease;
Multifocal motor neuropathy;
Multiple organ dysfunction syndrome;
Multiple sclerosis;
Multiple sclerosis relapse;
Multiple sclerosis relapse prophylaxis;
Multiple subpial transection;
Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children;
Muscular sarcoidosis;
Myasthenia gravis;
Myasthenia gravis crisis;
Myasthenia gravis neonatal;
Myasthenic syndrome;
Myelitis;
Myelitis transverse;
Myocardial infarction;
Myocarditis;
Myocarditis post infection;
Myoclonic epilepsy;
Myoclonic epilepsy and ragged-red fibres;
Myokymia;
Myositis;
Narcolepsy;
Nasal herpes;
Nasal obstruction;
Necrotising herpetic retinopathy;
Neonatal Crohn's disease;
Neonatal epileptic seizure;
Neonatal lupus erythematosus;
Neonatal mucocutaneous herpes simplex;
Neonatal pneumonia;
Neonatal seizure;
Nephritis;
Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis;
Neuralgic amyotrophy;
Neuritis;
Neuritis cranial;
Neuromyelitis optica pseudo relapse;
Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder;
Neuromyotonia;
Neuronal neuropathy;
Neuropathy peripheral;
Neuropathy, ataxia, retinitis pigmentosa syndrome;
Neuropsychiatric lupus;
Neurosarcoidosis;
Neutropenia;
Neutropenia neonatal;
Neutropenic colitis;
Neutropenic infection;
Neutropenic sepsis;
Nodular rash;
Nodular vasculitis;
Noninfectious myelitis;
Noninfective encephalitis;
Noninfective encephalomyelitis;
Noninfective oophoritis;
Obstetrical pulmonary embolism;
Occupational exposure to communicable disease;
Occupational exposure to SARS-CoV-2;
Ocular hyperaemia;
Ocular myasthenia;
Ocular pemphigoid;
Ocular sarcoidosis;
Ocular vasculitis;
Oculofacial paralysis;
Oedema;
Oedema blister;
Oedema due to hepatic disease;
Oedema mouth;
Oesophageal achalasia;
Ophthalmic artery thrombosis;
Ophthalmic herpes simplex;
Ophthalmic herpes zoster;
Ophthalmic vein thrombosis;
Optic neuritis;
Optic neuropathy;
Optic perineuritis;
Oral herpes;
What in the fuck.
[Part 3 of 3]
Oral lichen planus;
Oropharyngeal oedema;
Oropharyngeal spasm;
Oropharyngeal swelling;
Osmotic demyelination syndrome;
Ovarian vein thrombosis;
Overlap syndrome;
Paediatric autoimmune neuropsychiatric disorders associated with streptococcal infection;
Paget-Schroetter syndrome;
Palindromic rheumatism;
Palisaded neutrophilic granulomatous dermatitis;
Palmoplantar keratoderma;
Palpable purpura;
Pancreatitis;
Panencephalitis;
Papillophlebitis;
Paracancerous pneumonia;
Paradoxical embolism;
Parainfluenzae viral laryngotracheobronchitis;
Paraneoplastic dermatomyositis;
Paraneoplastic pemphigus;
Paraneoplastic thrombosis;
Paresis cranial nerve;
Parietal cell antibody positive;
Paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria;
Partial seizures;
Partial seizures with secondary generalisation;
Patient isolation;
Pelvic venous thrombosis;
Pemphigoid;
Pemphigus;
Penile vein thrombosis;
Pericarditis;
Pericarditis lupus;
Perihepatic discomfort;
Periorbital oedema;
Periorbital swelling;
Peripheral artery thrombosis;
Peripheral embolism;
Peripheral ischaemia;
Peripheral vein thrombus extension;
Periportal oedema;
Peritoneal fluid protein abnormal;
Peritoneal fluid protein decreased;
Peritoneal fluid protein increased;
Peritonitis lupus;
Pernicious anaemia;
Petit mal epilepsy;
Pharyngeal oedema;
Pharyngeal swelling;
Pityriasis lichenoides et varioliformis acuta;
Placenta praevia;
Pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis;
Pneumobilia;
Pneumonia;
Pneumonia adenoviral;
Pneumonia cytomegaloviral;
Pneumonia herpes viral;
Pneumonia influenzal;
Pneumonia measles;
Pneumonia mycoplasmal;
Pneumonia necrotising;
Pneumonia parainfluenzae viral;
Pneumonia respiratory syncytial viral;
Pneumonia viral;
POEMS syndrome;
Polyarteritis nodosa;
Polyarthritis;
Polychondritis;
Polyglandular autoimmune syndrome type I;
Polyglandular autoimmune syndrome type II;
Polyglandular autoimmune syndrome type III;
Polyglandular disorder;
Polymicrogyria;
Polymyalgia rheumatica;
Polymyositis;
Polyneuropathy;
Polyneuropathy idiopathic progressive;
Portal pyaemia;
Portal vein embolism;
Portal vein flow decreased;
Portal vein pressure increased;
Portal vein thrombosis;
Portosplenomesenteric venous thrombosis;
Post procedural hypotension;
Post procedural pneumonia;
Post procedural pulmonary embolism;
Post stroke epilepsy;
Post stroke seizure;
Post thrombotic retinopathy;
Post thrombotic syndrome;
Post viral fatigue syndrome;
Postictal headache;
Postictal paralysis;
Postictal psychosis;
Postictal state;
Postoperative respiratory distress;
Postoperative respiratory failure;
Postoperative thrombosis;
Postpartum thrombosis;
Postpartum venous thrombosis;
Postpericardiotomy syndrome;
Post-traumatic epilepsy;
Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome;
Precerebral artery thrombosis;
Pre-eclampsia;
Preictal state;
Premature labour;
Premature menopause;
Primary amyloidosis;
Primary biliary cholangitis;
Primary progressive multiple sclerosis;
Procedural shock;
Proctitis herpes;
Proctitis ulcerative;
Product availability issue;
Product distribution issue;
Product supply issue;
Progressive facial hemiatrophy;
Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy;
Progressive multiple sclerosis;
Progressive relapsing multiple sclerosis;
Prosthetic cardiac valve thrombosis;
Pruritus;
Pruritus allergic;
Pseudovasculitis;
Psoriasis;
Psoriatic arthropathy;
Pulmonary amyloidosis;
Pulmonary artery thrombosis;
Pulmonary embolism;
Pulmonary fibrosis;
Pulmonary haemorrhage;
Pulmonary microemboli;
Pulmonary oil microembolism;
Pulmonary renal syndrome;
Pulmonary sarcoidosis;
Pulmonary sepsis;
Pulmonary thrombosis;
Pulmonary tumour thrombotic microangiopathy;
Pulmonary vasculitis;
Pulmonary veno-occlusive disease;
Pulmonary venous thrombosis;
Pyoderma gangrenosum;
Pyostomatitis vegetans;
Pyrexia;
Quarantine;
Radiation leukopenia;
Radiculitis brachial;
Radiologically isolated syndrome;
Rash;
Rash erythematous;
Rash pruritic;
Rasmussen encephalitis;
Raynaud's phenomenon;
Reactive capillary endothelial proliferation;
Relapsing multiple sclerosis;
Relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis;
Renal amyloidosis;
Renal arteritis;
Renal artery thrombosis;
Renal embolism;
Renal failure;
Renal vascular thrombosis;
Renal vasculitis;
Renal vein embolism;
Renal vein thrombosis;
Respiratory arrest;
Respiratory disorder;
Respiratory distress;
Respiratory failure;
Respiratory paralysis;
Respiratory syncytial virus bronchiolitis;
Respiratory syncytial virus bronchitis;
Retinal artery embolism;
Retinal artery occlusion;
Retinal artery thrombosis;
Retinal vascular thrombosis;
Retinal vasculitis;
Retinal vein occlusion;
Retinal vein thrombosis;
Retinol binding protein decreased;
Retinopathy;
Retrograde portal vein flow;
Retroperitoneal fibrosis;
Reversible airways obstruction;
Reynold's syndrome;
Rheumatic brain disease;
Rheumatic disorder;
Rheumatoid arthritis;
Rheumatoid factor increased;
Rheumatoid factor positive;
Rheumatoid factor quantitative increased;
Rheumatoid lung;
Rheumatoid neutrophilic dermatosis;
Rheumatoid nodule;
Rheumatoid nodule removal;
Rheumatoid scleritis;
Rheumatoid vasculitis;
Saccadic eye movement;
SAPHO syndrome;
Sarcoidosis;
SARS-CoV-1 test;
SARS-CoV-1 test negative;
SARS-CoV-1 test positive;
SARS-CoV-2 antibody test;
SARS-CoV-2 antibody test negative;
SARS-CoV-2 antibody test positive;
SARS-CoV-2 carrier;
SARS-CoV-2 sepsis;
SARS-CoV-2 test;
SARSCoV-2 test false negative;
SARS-CoV-2 test false positive;
SARS-CoV-2 test negative;
SARSCoV-2 test positive;
SARS-CoV-2 viraemia;
Satoyoshi syndrome;
Schizencephaly;
Scleritis;
Sclerodactylia;
Scleroderma;
Scleroderma associated digital ulcer;
Scleroderma renal crisis;
Scleroderma-like reaction;
Secondary amyloidosis;
Secondary cerebellar degeneration;
Secondary progressive multiple sclerosis;
Segmented hyalinising vasculitis;
Seizure;
Seizure anoxic;
Seizure cluster;
Seizure like phenomena;
Seizure prophylaxis;
Sensation of foreign body;
Septic embolus;
Septic pulmonary embolism;
Severe acute respiratory syndrome;
Severe myoclonic epilepsy of infancy;
Shock;
Shock symptom;
Shrinking lung syndrome;
Shunt thrombosis;
Silent thyroiditis;
Simple partial seizures;
Sjogren's syndrome;
Skin swelling;
SLE arthritis;
Smooth muscle antibody positive;
Sneezing;
Spinal artery embolism;
Spinal artery thrombosis;
Splenic artery thrombosis;
Splenic embolism;
Splenic thrombosis;
Splenic vein thrombosis;
Spondylitis;
Spondyloarthropathy;
Spontaneous heparin-induced thrombocytopenia syndrome;
Status epilepticus;
Stevens-Johnson syndrome;
Stiff leg syndrome;
Stiff person syndrome;
Stillbirth;
Still's disease;
Stoma site thrombosis;
Stoma site vasculitis;
Stress cardiomyopathy;
Stridor;
Subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus;
Subacute endocarditis;
Subacute inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy;
Subclavian artery embolism;
Subclavian artery thrombosis;
Subclavian vein thrombosis;
Sudden unexplained death in epilepsy;
Superior sagittal sinus thrombosis;
Susac's syndrome;
Suspected COVID19;
Swelling;
Swelling face;
Swelling of eyelid;
Swollen tongue;
Sympathetic ophthalmia;
Systemic lupus erythematosus;
Systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity index abnormal;
Systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity index decreased;
Systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity index increased;
Systemic lupus erythematosus rash;
Systemic scleroderma;
Systemic sclerosis pulmonary;
Tachycardia;
Tachypnoea;
Takayasu's arteritis;
Temporal lobe epilepsy;
Terminal ileitis;
Testicular autoimmunity;
Throat tightness;
Thromboangiitis obliterans;
Thrombocytopenia;
Thrombocytopenic purpura;
Thrombophlebitis;
Thrombophlebitis migrans;
Thrombophlebitis neonatal;
Thrombophlebitis septic;
Thrombophlebitis superficial;
Thromboplastin antibody positive;
Thrombosis;
Thrombosis corpora cavernosa;
Thrombosis in device;
Thrombosis mesenteric vessel;
Thrombotic cerebral infarction;
Thrombotic microangiopathy;
Thrombotic stroke;
Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura;
Thyroid disorder;
Thyroid stimulating immunoglobulin increased;
Thyroiditis;
Tongue amyloidosis;
Tongue biting;
Tongue oedema;
Tonic clonic movements;
Tonic convulsion;
Tonic posturing;
Topectomy;
Total bile acids increased;
Toxic epidermal necrolysis;
Toxic leukoencephalopathy;
Toxic oil syndrome;
Tracheal obstruction;
Tracheal oedema;
Tracheobronchitis;
Tracheobronchitis mycoplasmal;
Tracheobronchitis viral;
Transaminases abnormal;
Transaminases increased;
Transfusion-related alloimmune neutropenia;
Transient epileptic amnesia;
Transverse sinus thrombosis;
Trigeminal nerve paresis;
Trigeminal neuralgia;
Trigeminal palsy;
Truncus coeliacus thrombosis;
Tuberous sclerosis complex;
Tubulointerstitial nephritis and uveitis syndrome;
Tumefactive multiple sclerosis;
Tumour embolism;
Tumour thrombosis;
Type 1 diabetes mellitus;
Type I hypersensitivity;
Type III immune complex mediated reaction;
Uhthoff's phenomenon;
Ulcerative keratitis;
Ultrasound liver abnormal;
Umbilical cord thrombosis;
Uncinate fits;
Undifferentiated connective tissue disease;
Upper airway obstruction;
Urine bilirubin increased;
Urobilinogen urine decreased;
Urobilinogen urine increased;
Urticaria;
Urticaria papular;
Urticarial vasculitis;
Uterine rupture;
Uveitis;
Vaccination site thrombosis;
Vaccination site vasculitis;
Vagus nerve paralysis;
Varicella;
Varicella keratitis;
Varicella post vaccine;
Varicella zoster gastritis;
Varicella zoster oesophagitis;
Varicella zoster pneumonia;
Varicella zoster sepsis;
Varicella zoster virus infection;
Vasa praevia;
Vascular graft thrombosis;
Vascular pseudoaneurysm thrombosis;
Vascular purpura;
Vascular stent thrombosis;
Vasculitic rash;
Vasculitic ulcer;
Vasculitis;
Vasculitis gastrointestinal;
Vasculitis necrotising;
Vena cava embolism;
Vena cava thrombosis;
Venous intravasation;
Venous recanalisation;
Venous thrombosis;
Venous thrombosis in pregnancy;
Venous thrombosis limb;
Venous thrombosis neonatal;
Vertebral artery thrombosis;
Vessel puncture site thrombosis;
Visceral venous thrombosis;
VIth nerve paralysis;
VIth nerve paresis;
Vitiligo;
Vocal cord paralysis;
Vocal cord paresis;
Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease;
Warm type haemolytic anaemia;
Wheezing;
White nipple sign;
XIth nerve paralysis;
X-ray hepatobiliary abnormal;
Young's syndrome;
Zika virus associated Guillain Barre syndrome.
[END]
That’s a lot of herpes
Jeeeeeez man, that’s the longest comment I’ve ever read.
You read all of that? Bravo
Yep. I’m not in the medical field, but I’m fascinated with human physiology and so been studying for years. A LOT of this list is autoimmune in nature, even if it isn’t called as such.
I’m convinced that vaccines cause autoimmune conditions, not just these experimental injections, but ALL vaccines. We are totally fucking up people’s immune systems permanently. It appears there are some folks who have genetic predisposition toward injury. Looks like Russian Roulette to me.
Also, I don’t believe that every single issue on this list can be attributed to the injection....the Deja Vu for example 😂
Damn... you know someone is going to make this into a rap song as a meme
Billy Joel’s we didn’t start the fire has a good beat for it.
Be a 30 minute song with 29 of those minutes being an extension of the main hook
No wonder they didn't want this released for 75 years. If you have a truth social account, you should let everyone see the link to this.
we need to clarify that.
these are pages of small print, tight line spacing, and the terms are one after another on the lines. it is a wall of text that goes on for pages and pages.
I just checked, these aren't just walls of the same text being repeated.
quite right. entirely alphabetical.
I was going to say this. If it were spaced like a business letter with similar font size, it would be twice as many pages.
Wow! That's a long list! Pfizer's moral compass has no bottom floor. Well, I suppose it goes straight to Hell.
I think I get what you are trying to say. But I'm not sure about one piece of this. Where do you get:
NO_VAX[SUM(INSTANCES OF ADVERSE EVENT)]
So this would require a list of adverse events experienced by people who didn't get the vaccine, right? Basically the control group.
Is this information in the document? I read most of it and it seems to be only adverse events of vaxxed people. Not control group?
Personally I just wish we'd stop letting troglodytes selectively run rampant here.
Let’s make this easy.
Empirically prove that this is true. Please utilize the source material to do so.
I’ve read the document. I’m asking for a specific piece of information you claim is in the document.
Please cite where in the document you can prove the following assertion you made:
I would like to see what part of the document states this as true. Can you give me the page number and quote?
No, I need the line that proves this exact statement by u/zeitreise:
That is foundational for his argument. If he can't prove that this is supported by the document, then his argument can't really proceed from there without admitting he's making assumptions unsupported by the source.
The source, in fact, says he is wrong. On page six:
This sentence is VITAL context for the data you're looking at.
"This data shows that bad things happened after the drug. We do not know which of these, if any, was definitely caused by the vaccine. People get sick all the time, and verifying whether this was actually a vaccine injury or not would require context we do not usually have."
Broken down further:
"You're going to see a shit-ton of scary symptoms here in the data. For any report of those symptoms, there's somewhere between a 0% and 100% that the report shows an actual vaccine issue and not just random medical bullshit. If you want to know for sure, then you'll need to check with the patient, because we don't know."
Which means, that no, you cannot say each adverse "instance" was actually a vaccine injury event. Because it's clearly stated that the data does not represent verified vaccine injuries, and nobody knows yet how much of this might just be random medical bullshit. These databases don't carry that information.
They're just a tip line for things that DID happen that might, maybe, possibly be connected in some way to the vaccine.
Essentially, it's just a a simple correlation/causation error. You cannot assume causation based on correlation, and these databases are incapable of proving causation. Therefore, you can't use the data to prove ANYTHING about vaccine injury. That is done by further studies that are based on the data from databases like these.
And now with a study just released stating that those who took two doses of the vax are more likely to catch SARS - COV - 2 than those that didn't.
For VAERS? No. A doctor does not have to believe it's related to the vaccine to be required to report it to VAERS. A doctor just has to be completely unable to empirically rule out the vaccine. So, if it's not a gunshot to the face, then a doctor could viably HAVE to report it to VAERS. That's by design.
They say so themselves:
https://vaers.hhs.gov/resources/infoproviders.html
https://vaers.hhs.gov/docs/VAERS_Table_of_Reportable_Events_Following_Vaccination.pdf
The point of an adverse event database is not to prove that adverse events are connected to vaccines. It's to establish a tip-line that gives medical researchers an idea of where they should be looking at variations above the baseline of garbage data.
I strangely agree with your overall argument, reddit slut. Correlation indeed does not equate causation NECESSARILY.
However, from what I learned in my Psychology Statistics courses, strong correlations are specifically measured to discover their respective measures of reliability and validity.
And therefore an enormous reason why these public health institutions CANT be trusted is because they outright refuse to explore in depth much less acknowledge the statistically significant amount of VAERS adverse events that occur after these covid vaccines.
And with the long track record of these SAME big Pharma companies of choosing to place their profit margins over their product safety, you would be a naive fool would outright ignore this very valid, irrefutable fact.
You make some good points. Here's what I say.
Strong correlations are important. They are not to be disregarded. In a statistics class, you tend to be given data specifically curated to illustrate workable correlations.
However, as you already know, real-world correlations have a lot more confounding factors than any classroom project, and correlations are therefore going to exist between an infinite number of things that are only remotely related to one another.
When you look at VAERS, you see a lot of bad things happening, and you think, "There is a significant number of bad things happening to vaccinated people."
But are there?
For instance, nothing bad has happened to me, and I was vaccinated earlier than almost anyone. I was boostered in October. I've had no problems, no symptoms, nothing.
I am not represented in VAERS. I have not submitted any reports. Nothing has been submitted about me. I do not exist in the data set.
Nor do any of my coworkers. Or my family. Or my friends. Or honestly, anyone I know. Nobody had anything worse than a shitty flu-like weekend and a sore arm, and even that was rare. None of us are in VAERS, because we're all fine.
So how exactly are you establishing a correlation of bad things happening to vaccinated people by looking at a database where the only population being studied are vaccinated people who have had bad things happen to them?
That would be like me creating a database documenting violence perpetrated by Q supporters, and then assuming that Q people are fucking nuts because I'm getting a bunch of reports of violence submitted by people who thought the perpetrator was kind of Q'y looking.
Assume nobody lied in my database, and most or all submissions were simply wrong about the bad guy being associated with Q. There's no fraud. Just incorrect assumptions.
My database doesn't show that. It only shows SUSPECTED cases of Q-related violence. It's a tip line for me to investigate, nothing more. Nothing's verified.
So would it be viable to say, "this database that only collects unverified reports of Q-related violence shows a strong correlation between Q beliefs and violence"? Or would that seem like a completely unfounded way of understanding the data?
Known adverse effects is not the same thing as proven vaccine injury. Adverse effects are merely reported after a vaccine. They are not proven to be caused by the vaccine.
VAERS states this. This report states this on page 6.
Again, your assumptions are hamstringing your validity as a claimed data scientist.
It's not exactly that it's a coincidence.
Doctors have to report every symptom that happens after a vaccine to VAERS.
So a 98 year old alcoholic who dies of liver failure a week after the vaccine? That's going in as a death in VAERS.
Nobody lied. Nobody committed fraud. But the vaccine didn't kill that person, even though it's in VAERS.
VAERS DEMANDS to have ALL symptoms that occur. Even ones that are absolutely not the vaccine. Not a single report is verified to have anything to do with the vaccine before it's listed in VAERS.
Because no report is verified, and EVERY symptom after EVERY vaccine is supposed to be reported, then yes, it's entirely possible that not a single report in VAERS or in this Pfizer report was caused by the vaccine. The system would, by design, be absolutely flooded with garbage data.
Every adverse reaction database works this way. They work like police tip lines. We don't assume we have 10,000 identical criminals just because one tip line got 10,000 tips. Many of those people were just wrong.
Changing the subject again when asked simply and directly to provide empirical evidence if your claims. This is a pattern. Which is why I’ve been engaging with you less.
It is immensely easier to put on the persona of expertise and intelligence by implying that empirically proving even a single one of your claims or establishing falsifiable premises is beneath you.
You’re like the third poster in this site’s history that has tried this strategy. It gets less effective when people see the avoidance pattern, and that’s hard to hide on a site full of pattern-seers.
Page 30 lists adverse events reported to the database. Adverse events are not established as proven vaccine injuries, just events that occurred in some period after a vaccination. This is the same as VAERS.
See page 5-6.
You cannot look at a list of adverse events reported spontaneously to the database and empirically deduce that each adverse event correlates directly to a confirmed vaccine injury.
You can make assumptions, but so can I, and that is not empirical.
Please quote the part of the report that confirms the assertion you made. So far, I can only see you relying on an assumption of how this data must correlate with vaccine injury, and refusing to demonstrate any empirical basis for that assumption by claiming that you’re just way smarter than me.
Perhaps you are. But for the benefit of your peers, who tend to hate fake researchers who make up bullshit to fit their narrative and lord their intelligence over everyone when questioned, can you lay out the mathematical basis of these assumptions?
I can understand where you are coming from, but I would like to make a broader point about truth communities like ours.
The broad goal here is NOT to prove beyond reasonable doubt to every single person that what we claim is true. Thats beyond the scope of any human being.
The broad goal is to provide enough information to make people ask themselves "am I perhaps being lied to?". This question needs to come from each person, because only when they reach this point will they actually open their minds to the truth.
You haven't reached that point, unfortunately. Hopefully you will, in the days/weeks to come.
Frigging sidebar material right there!
Many people faint after being around needles. I can't base any sort of assumption merely on seeing evidence of people falling down after being sticked with a needle. It happens literally every day in every doctor's office around the world.
So yeah, that wouldn't really cut it.
Define Vaccine Injury in Relationship to Adverse Events? Is death an injury or is it considered an Adverse Event?
Yes.
https://www.fda.gov/safety/reporting-serious-problems-fda/what-serious-adverse-event
Be careful here, though. "Associated" does NOT mean "caused by" or even "significantly related to." It means, "there is some relationship between a thing happening and another thing happening."
In VAERS, for instance, that means, "a vaccine was administered, and then a bad thing happened."
That's the association. That adverse event could be that you develop cancer, or die, or that your fingernails get darker, or penis falls off.
The adverse event can be caused by ANYTHING, but has to happen after the vaccine. That's the association. Once that association is established, we can then try to verify whether or not the vaccine actually DID cause that adverse event, or if the adverse event was due to something else.
VAERS does not do that. VAERS is a database of reported adverse events, not confirmed vaccine injuries.
You use VAERS data to figure out where you look for potential vaccine injuries.
Im sorry you took the death serum. I hope you survive your ignorance. Ill pray you find peace in the next realm.
I appreciate that and also hope I survive it. I’m just not as worried about it as you are, but that does make your words more meaningful. Thank you.
Dude, this is literally Pfizer's own data.
Which says that it is a list of adverse events, not confirmed vaccine reactions. There is a world of difference between the two. Adverse events can be from literally anything. They just happened after the vaccine. It’s not considered a vaccine injury unless it gets verified in context.
Neither VAERS nor this report is listing vaccine injuries. It lists adverse events following vaccination that could have been from one of a million things, and serve as a starting point for medical investigators. There could be three total legitimate cases in this report, and we have no way of knowing which ones they are by looking at this data.
What you are saying is simply not true. Adverse events if severe enough constitute injury. I think you need to define 'vaccine injury' before you continue. There is no listing in a PI regarding 'injury'... they fall under Adverse Events (this includes Infections / Serious Adverse Events and Death)
All medications approved by the FDA have this information, and its robust, and long term. It's Trial Safety Data.
You are trying to say injury is different than Adverse Events, which is ridiculous.
This Adverse Events following these mRNA jabs is something we have never seen before, they are endless. And this isn't even long term Safety Data. VAERS only verifies this.
So I ask you, define vaccine injury in relation to Adverse Events.
I'm not suggesting an adverse reaction has to hit some threshold of severity to count.
A vaccine injury is ALWAYS an adverse event. But an adverse event is not necessarily a vaccine injury.
If I get a vaccine, and then two days later, I have a stomach ache, that is DEFINITIONALLY an adverse event. I can submit it to VAERS. Once it's there, you will think that proves that vaccines cause stomach aches.
In truth, I had the stomach ache because I drank a lot of alcohol and am hungover, and am too stupid to make the connection. I just reported it as a random stomach ache after I got the vaccine.
I did not commit fraud by misattributing my stomach ache. I did what VAERS wanted me to do.
The stomach ache is an adverse event.
The stomach ache is not a vaccine injury.
They are two different terms for a reason.
VAERS records adverse events. It does not record vaccine injuries. That can only be done by verifying adverse events as being caused by vaccine injuries, which VAERS does not do.
If the database is not verifying which reports are from the vaccine and which are not, then you can't use that data to make conclusions about how bad the vaccine is.
VAERS is a reported system that monitors Adverse Events, to include Injury (if the Adverse Event is severe enough). They are not two different terms, you are making them two different terms. I asked you to define 'injury', and you did not, because injury is subjective. A severe stomach ache to someone could be considered injury, but in clinical trials the term is not used, because its subjective.
The real safety data come from clinical trials which uses placebo. Through short and long term safety data (compared against placebo) compared to VAERS data we can get a better understanding of the 'SAFETY' of a medication, short and long term.
Problem is Pfizer blew up the control arm by vaccinating them
Okay, look. I'm going to give you made-up VAERS data. Let's say these five cases all happen a week after vaccination. Broken down, this is what VAERS would show:
These are adverse events. These five things actually happened after the vaccination. These things would be shown in VAERS.
At this point, the Q crowd is done. They conclude that the vaccine must have caused two cases of death, paralysis, heart inflammation, and a blue tongue, since these were listed as adverse events.
BUT THAT IS INCORRECT.
I, a medical researcher, am going to take that VAERS data, and I'm going to investigate the fuck out of every case. I come back with the following causes for the adverse events:
Well, guess what? These are STILL adverse events! They still happened after the vaccination!
But we know they have nothing to do with the vaccine. They are NOT vaccine injuries.
Adverse events are correlation. Vaccine injuries are causation.
If you accept VAERS data as indicative of vaccine injury, you're making a correlation/causation logical fallacy, and VAERS itself will tell you this.
https://vaers.hhs.gov/data/dataguide.html
I concur. I worked in heart medication clinical drug trials and we had to report EVERY SINGLE symptom, no matter what. Your example if the stomach ache is perfect.
What you can do is start correlating in retrospect how many had a stomach ache, how soon after, what comirbidities were common, etc ...
Yep.
And such studies already exist. One compared the myocarditis rarely associated with vaccination with non-vaccine myocarditis found "in nature."
They found that while regular viral myocarditis is typically a big deal, myocarditis following vaccination is usually very mild. This makes sense: heart inflammation is a response to viral infection, and vaccines are very weak viruses, so it's a much weaker response.
So when they did the comparison, they found that the problems resolved more quickly and more quickly. Viral myocarditis is unpredictable and can require a heart transplant, but the sample studied with vaccine-related myocarditis were able to get through it quickly with only painkillers.
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2788346
The problem isn't whether these correlations are being actively studied and established. It's whether or not people will trust that research enough to change their mind on taking a vaccine they're convinced will kill them.
So basically every disorder/disease known to man lol
No no no. Every disorder/disease imaginable by man.
And even some unimaginable ones we haven't discovered yet...
I wonder how many of those were destroyed in the Ukraine recently.
KNOWINGLY KNOWINGLY KNOWINGLY KNOWINGLY KNOWINGLY KNOWINGLY KNOWINGLY KNOWINGLY KNOWINGLY KNOWINGLY KNOWINGLY KNOWINGLY KNOWINGLY KNOWINGLY KNOWINGLY KNOWINGLY KNOWINGLY
Great red pill EXCEPT I can't find a mention of the original source, other than PHMPT. It shows up in lots of web searches but just on PHMPT and random blog sites.
Is there an official source link for the document, from FDA or CDC or something?
Sauce needed or people will just dismiss it as phony.
This court document proves that they indeed filed the FOIA request: https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/091621-Complaint.pdf
Here is the case details independant of their site: https://dockets.justia.com/docket/texas/txndce/4:2021cv01058/353278
And here is the PACER link to get access to full documents: https://ecf.txnd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?353278
You will require someone with PACER subscription to access the full docs.
I think given the entity filing the FOIA is providing these documents, its a safe point to make that the documents they are providing is authentic unless you can show history of fraud on their part.
I don't have time right now to hunt down a more 'official' source, but it is the same document that was out in January and here is a link to Reuters, who confirmed it's validity by referencing it and (of course) fact checking certain claims about it. Reuters showed it to the fda to back up their argument about public claims of spontaneous abortions.
I can't tell you how many people I have heard about who have gotten their legs cleaned out recently this year... including my own sister who took both jabs at least.
Got their legs cleaned out?
Their clogged arteries in their legs are reamed out from the groin down.
Holy shit, that's fucking wild.
My fully vaccinated mom's death certificate says she died of COVID-Pneumonia.
COVID-Pneumonia is a side effect of and adverse event listed in Pfizer's data.
Pretty frustrating & upsetting, to say the least.
No wonder they wanted 50 - 75 years before having to release the information. Most of the generation that took the jab would be dead (either by natural causes or prematurely) from the clot shot!
I nearly died of old age just reading through that list.
😂😂
*Reports are submitted voluntarily, and the magnitude of underreporting is unknown.
*Due to the large numbers of spontaneous adverse event reports received for the product, the MAH has prioritised the processing of serious cases.
*Number of relevant medication error cases: 20562
*Top 10 countries of incidence: (med error)− US (1201), France (171), UK (138)...
So women outnumber men more than 3 to 1 in adverse reactions. Women between 31 and 50 yrs are super screwed.
But hey, it would have been worse without the jab, eh?
Take a look at page 37:
Covid-19 is listed as one of the things you can get if you take the vaccine. Great job guys, the vax really protects! /s
Holy shit. This is from february of 2021. Before the vaccines were even widely available. And that is the most frightening list of adverse events I have ever seen. What the fuck…
I want to hear an auctioneer take five minutes at the end of all the jab pushing commercials read through the whole thing.
Do we have numbers on how many people it affects?
Like "people with adverse reactions" vs "total people"
So we can get a whole picture of the situation
You really have to read through all the pages before the adverse reactions. And honestly I think it doesn't matter. The numbers are so vast while they acknowledge reporting is voluntary...this should have never seen light of day.
Did i see herpes?
You saw a wholotta herpes
I was promised 10,000 pages!
THIRTY FIVE different auto-immune conditions. That 'auto-immune' list alone is enough to reject this shot.
See page 20 of the report for the number of actual auto-immune reactions.
Deletion syndrome is a disorder that involves many different areas of the body and can vary greatly in severity among people with the condition. Signs and symptoms may include: cleft palate, heart defects, recurrent infections, unique facial characteristics, feeding problems, kidney abnormalities, hypoparathyroidism, thrombocytopenia, scoliosis, hearing loss, developmental delay, and learning disabilities. People with this condition are also more likely to develop certain autoimmune disorders and personality disorders. 22q11.2 deletion syndrome is caused by a deletion of a small part of chromosome 22 near the middle of the chromosome at a location known as q11.2.
MRNA did its job on the first symptom alone.
Unbelievable. Criminals
Holy shit.
That's like...all of the side effects.
Uh guys this is the same document from the previous release in December, I just compared it to the one I already have. This is not a new release and I haven't found the new documents that were supposed to be released this week yet.
Imagine what'll be in there.
:-(
lmao, a list of side effects listed in alphabetical order.
Don’t forget pfizer unblinded the trials almost immediately so the true impact will likely never be known. What we see as horrible as it is doesn’t likely reflect the true impact.
Many of these reactions are typically FATAL and many are IRREVERSABLE.
Ruminating fuckery working it's evil until you become sick. If you took this shit, the real shit; sooner or later you're going to be a lifelong customer.
Probably just as sick, is the sad truth that most of the normies that pushed this crap or took it themselves could not care less.
It would have been nice if the adverse reaction section was in a list.
Wow. Pages and pages of adverse events.
Are we supposed to believe that every single jab recipient was fully informed of nine pages of known risks?
They weren't. They couldn't have been.
What sane person would inject an experimental drug their body even if one in a million had each effect? #pfucked
Let's break this down so that every crayon eating moron can understand the bigger point, the ONLY point that truly matters... "the fox knows many things, but the hedgehog knows one big thing."
What the hedgehog knows: the propaganda machine lied and continues to lie about the possibility (at the very least) of harm caused by the various drugs (not really vaccines, but when you change the definitions of words... I digress) they claim are so safe, based on their testing that didn't face anywhere near the level of scrutiny normally required for pharmacudical treatments, OR AT THE VERY LEAST the ineffectiveness of the drug, which they claim[ed] to be so incredibly effective.
Claim: "drug is safe and effective."
Evidence based observed reality:
While not always a 100% provable correlation, there are indicators suggesting possible reaction and/or injury caused by said drug. An immunization should render the person IMMUNE. They should experience no effect from the virus. None. That's literally the definition of immunity. And yet, MORE people tested positive and experienced symptoms after the vax push than prior to it. More symptoms. More cases. More deaths. Where are all the people getting polio? So because reality is not in sync with the promise, doubt rises. Controllers cannot lose grip over minds. So they change the narrative, move the goal posts, redefine words, claim "NeW VaRiAnTs". And some retards will still continue to believe the lies because the come from authority figures..
Test subject: "Are you sure it's ok to keep shocking him? His screams (evidence) sounds like he's in pain."
Authority: "Oh yes. He's fine. That's just a natural side effect. He really should get the answers right. He'll eventually figure out he should try harder to get the right answers so he won't get shocked."
Test subject: "He's not making noises anymore, really sure he's ok?"
Authory: "Absolutely fine! Would I lie to you?"
Any idea how this humongous list compares with normal/traditional vaccines?
Looks like new files just dropped.
I'll take Herpes zoster meningoradiculitis. Y'all can have the rest.
Shared this everywhere. Thank you. I used a nice TIL about herpes also. Fuck me if one can look at this list and thinks this poison is ok.
Holy shit!