Feels a bit related as well:

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/113301536483621969

I've been digging on this and the corresponding Truth.

https://x.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1844869841087258770

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/113292078461228157

I think it's also worth reading some of the discussion of the "Occupation Chapter" and how it's interpreted by various military analysts.

https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3011827

I wonder if there is a sort of covert discussion/negotiation going on as to what kind of occupation we are under, what is permitted (notice that changes to the constitution are specifically mentioned).

"conservationist principle" vs "transformation project(s)"

The occupation chapter in the 2015 Manual is not an original publication. It builds on the corresponding chapter in the 1956 Manual (as amended in 1976) and its antecedents. Thus, the present analysis pertains to a long standing view of the US and is not limited to the 2015 Manual. Nevertheless, the recent update informs the analysis through a number of innovative features. First, it contains a much more elaborate doctrinal exposition with regard to the two questions, reflecting the engagement of practitioners and scholars with these issues through the years.

This engagement, in turn, stems both from developments in international relations, such as military interventions that are not motivated by territorial aspirations and a growing participation of non-state actors who wield territorial control; and from developments in international law, such as the emergence of the law of non-international armed conflict, international human rights law and the law of self determination. Furthermore, its treatment of issues is not in all cases identical to that in the 1956 Manual, indicating a change in the view at least of the DoD on those matters. In addition, the 2015 Manual, unlike its antecedent, makes extensive use of references, especially in the sections on the framework of the law of occupation, citing judicial rulings, government action and military manuals, as well as academic writing (albeit almost exclusively of the US, a matter discussed below).

"a growing participation of non-state actors who wield territorial control" -- what shadowy group does that sound like to you?

"law of non-international armed conflict" -- i.e. civil war

"law of self determination" -- do we have it under our current system of pedo politicians controlled, blackmailed, and murdered by the CIA/FBI/Mossad?

I might make a post highlighting this paper as analysis from military workers on interpreting the Manual & its history seems to be of high value.

It would be good politics to go after an older candidate's health, if that candidate wasn't travelling and interacting with the public at an incredibly high level, and if you hadn't just successfully bullied the public into imagining Biden's age/health was not an issue, and if you hadn't just had to drop Biden as a candidate because of his age/health that you just lied about, and if Trump hadn't already publicly released a doctor's assessment of his health as well as having gone so far as to take a cognitive test.

This kind of thing is the subtle reason it should be obvious that white hats are in control. Yeah, Kamala is dumb, but not this dumb, and her would-be handlers would come up with a better line of attack if they had agency.

https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/VP-Harris-Health-Summary.pdf

====

"...drinks only occasionally and in moderation...."

Hmm...

I'm hoping the baby stuff is BBBY.

🙏🙏thx fren!

That's a great point regarding the provisional. I wonder though how easily that would be to implement, but it does seem that the legislature would have to legislate that for it to be an "out" for this situation.

My gut feeling is the court will find a compelling state interest.

This case deals specifically w/respect to the 69 day period up to elections when new voters are registering (after the Quiet Period has been entered and up to the 21 day deadline to register to vote).

I'm not sure it's even about illegals voting. They're here for cash and good times and likely don't give a fig about the election.

Note that the cabal is very smug and confident about stating that no illegal immigrants are voting. I think that's for a reason: they're not. Rather, the cabal is voting on their behalf through security gaps in the registration system.

https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/4929789-doj-sues-virginia-voter-rolls/

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.vaed.561740/gov.uscourts.vaed.561740.1.0.pdf

So what is good to understand about this, is there is the Quiet Period Provision of the National Voter Registration Act, as I think this case reveals the details of how it's used by the cabal to drive fraudulent registration.

Basically, in the 90 days period before an election, the states are not allowed to clean voter rolls on certain factors. Citizenship is one of those factors.

Youngkin initiated a program to clean voter rolls of non-citizens by cross referencing them with DMV records of noncitizen drivers.

Citizenship is not excepted from the Quiet Period. See Arcia v. Fla. Sec’y of State

https://casetext.com/case/arcia-v-fla-secy-of-state-2

This case could I suppose create conflicting decisions and bring the matter to the Supreme Court that States have a compelling interest in validating the citizenship of voters during the Quiet Period.

Could non-citizens in the DMV database be a quick cabal source for filling in the voter rolls and voting on their behalf?

Case can be followed here:

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69256404/united-states-v-beals/

This might be it:

https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3011827

Can anyone help a fren with a link to the Law of War Manual and also this accessory book?

The United States Department of Defense Law of War Manual -- Commentary and Critique

It has a chapter:

The DoD Conception of the Law of Occupation

I'm trying to read up on the concept of "occupation" in relation to this Trump tweet that mentions OCCUPIED AMERICA:

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1844869841087258770

Buy what you want, beg for what you need.

Trump knew the inevitable backlash from his not being in the pamphlet would show the Oregon SoS for what they are and be worth more than $3500 and being in the pamphlet as the most widely known candidate in history.

A dark but frosty analysis.

Does anyone else read this "sending of the COVID test to Putin" narrative as code for:

"Trump sent a tool to Putin that allows him to identify cabal members"

Because we had all those instances of cabal members "testing positive for COVID" and "working from home". Tested positive = put into submission, being questioned, etc.?

u/#q4585

Trump announced Rebe's grave is a National Heritage Site, Aug 9 2020:

https://www.chabad.org/news/article_cdo/aid/4836952/jewish/Rabbi-Levi-Yitzchak-Schneersons-Grave-Declared-Heritage-Site.htm

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/QxfTB1Uzs34

https://5townscentral.com/2020/08/10/trump-administration-announced-that-the-ohel-of-r-levi-yitzchak-schneerson-an-offical-heritage-site/

https://collive.com/president-trump-declares-rebbes-fathers-gravesite-official-heritage-site/

Chabad's Stance on the Trump Peace Plan: Field Report

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IGmyjAmITUE

Opposed to peace deal that would lead to land concessions.

^ This video worth watching for some recent historical context...

https://www.ohelchabad.org/templates/articlecco_cdo/aid/3402126/jewish/About-the-Ohel.htm

https://www.ohelchabad.org/templates/articlecco_cdo/aid/78447/jewish/Conduct.htm

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Menachem_Mendel_Schneerson

Not sure if it's just typical bending of the knee to Israel or what, but maybe someone will spot an interesting detail.

I thought it was kinda wild that Schneerson's motorcade ran over two kids and kicked off the Crown Heights riots.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crown_Heights_riot

#1824 hits "the the" also in terms of US money being spent elsewhere.

u/#q1824

Oh, not for us then?

https://www.fema.gov/about/organization/offices-leadership

If you search (Acting) in here we have a list of potential candidates who are in past their expiration date. There appear to be 15.

Nicole C. Wood, Director (Acting)

Malia Collins, Deputy Director (Acting)

Angela R. Gladwell, Deputy Associate Administrator (Acting)

Randolf “Randy” Steiner, Chief Technology Officer (Acting)

Brian Given, Deputy Chief Security Officer (Acting)

Robin Keegan, Associate Administrator (Acting)

Jeffrey Jackson, Assistant Administrator (Acting), Federal Insurance

Rachel Cychosz, Assistant Administrator (Acting), Risk Management

Robert A. Farmer, Deputy Assistant Administrator (Acting)

Keith Turi, Associate Administrator (Acting)

Leiloni Stainsby, Deputy Associate Administrator (Acting)

Robert Sullivan, Assistant Administrator (Acting)

Thomas Connelly, Deputy Assistant Administrator (Acting)

Rodrigus McAllister, National Incident Management Assistance Team Leader (Blue) (Acting)

Bob Grimley, Acting Deputy Director, Public Assistance Division

================

Spot checking a few of these, and operating under the assumption that the webpage is listing their "acting" status corrrectly(which is a huge assumption).

Bob Grimley seems to have been in for 11 months. Director, Recovery Division Dec 2023 - Present 11 months

Rodrigus McAllister looks like they've been in since May 2024.

https://www.fema.gov/about/organization/rodrigus-mcallister

Robert Sullivan also since May 2024. We have a "May" trend her which ties to drop #1433

https://www.fema.gov/about/organization/robert-sullivan

Leiloni Stainsby, we have a SEC sighting as well as a May appointment...

https://www.fema.gov/about/organization/leiloni-stainsby

I think all the may ones are under 210 days until December.

So is anyone related to FEMA an acting official that has expired?

It's more corruptive than censorial.

It can be seen even in basic things like window lites, trimwork, low ceilings, prominent garage placement, etc. Things designed to flatten and misshape the building, then like modern artwork or body positivity--bully the people into thinking bad is good or avant-garde.

This was a low-key EO that didn't get a lot of attention, but if you've walked through a brutalist government building recently, you'll appreciate it:

https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/presidential-actions/executive-order-promoting-beautiful-federal-civic-architecture/

I did not know this. Had some vague recollection about Beau being a prosecutor or somesuch (common stepping stone to higher office).

Really great digging on a topic hidden in plain sight.

https://x.com/dezzie_rezzie

The link doesn't seem to be in the announcement here:

https://www.donaldjtrump.com/news/0668716d-28c1-4be6-ae3f-31960f9093e1

It may be specific to the medium of delivery, or a browser enhancement that is auto-highlighting certain key terms. Hard to say.

I see some Q's but also a good chunk of O's too TBH. 🤣

Make sure to stick around for the opera performance..