I wonder if there is a sort of covert discussion/negotiation going on as to what kind of occupation we are under, what is permitted (notice that changes to the constitution are specifically mentioned).
"conservationist principle" vs "transformation project(s)"
The occupation chapter in the 2015 Manual is not an original publication. It builds on the corresponding chapter in the 1956 Manual (as amended in 1976) and its antecedents. Thus, the present analysis pertains to a long standing view of the US and is not limited to the 2015 Manual. Nevertheless, the recent update informs the analysis through a number of innovative features. First, it contains a much more elaborate doctrinal exposition with regard to the two questions, reflecting the engagement of practitioners and scholars with these issues through the years.
This engagement, in turn, stems both from developments in international relations, such as military interventions that are not motivated by territorial aspirations and a growing participation of non-state actors who wield territorial control; and from developments in international law, such as the emergence of the law of non-international armed conflict, international human rights law and the law of self determination. Furthermore, its treatment of issues is not in all cases identical to that in the 1956 Manual, indicating a change in the view at least of the DoD on those matters. In addition, the 2015 Manual, unlike its antecedent, makes extensive use of references, especially in the sections on the framework of the law of occupation, citing judicial rulings, government action and military manuals, as well as academic writing (albeit almost exclusively of the US, a matter discussed below).
"a growing participation of non-state actors who wield territorial control" -- what shadowy group does that sound like to you?
"law of non-international armed conflict" -- i.e. civil war
"law of self determination" -- do we have it under our current system of pedo politicians controlled, blackmailed, and murdered by the CIA/FBI/Mossad?
I might make a post highlighting this paper as analysis from military workers on interpreting the Manual & its history seems to be of high value.
Trump has entered a phase of almost open communications with anons confirming our increasing understanding of the plans implementation and overall status. This isnt the first direct link in just the last few days.
This is the Storm. The precipice nears. Prepare for a bumpy ride but the conclusion is set in stone.
exactly what I thought when he said it. 11.3 verifies as First Marker.
Think about it logically.
The only way is the military. Fully controlled. Save & spread (once 11.3 verifies as 1st marker).
Biggest advanced drop on Pol.
Maybe a landslide victory for Trump is all the military needs to put the final steps of the plan into action? Meaning they can start when he is declared the winner, not when he is inaugurated…
There are many ways this could play out, but DJT did once say at a rally (responding to a women in the crowd) that he would be back "...sooner than you think." It's possible the occupying force will be removed prior to 1/20/25.
I wonder about that as well, because he continually mentions Nov5, but never Jan20. Maybe he knows something we don’t. Maybe that something is the Brunson case.
THAT IS MUSIC TO MY EARS!!!! Thank you!
I've been digging on this and the corresponding Truth.
https://x.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1844869841087258770
https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/113292078461228157
I think it's also worth reading some of the discussion of the "Occupation Chapter" and how it's interpreted by various military analysts.
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3011827
I wonder if there is a sort of covert discussion/negotiation going on as to what kind of occupation we are under, what is permitted (notice that changes to the constitution are specifically mentioned).
"conservationist principle" vs "transformation project(s)"
"a growing participation of non-state actors who wield territorial control" -- what shadowy group does that sound like to you?
"law of non-international armed conflict" -- i.e. civil war
"law of self determination" -- do we have it under our current system of pedo politicians controlled, blackmailed, and murdered by the CIA/FBI/Mossad?
I might make a post highlighting this paper as analysis from military workers on interpreting the Manual & its history seems to be of high value.
Trump has entered a phase of almost open communications with anons confirming our increasing understanding of the plans implementation and overall status. This isnt the first direct link in just the last few days.
This is the Storm. The precipice nears. Prepare for a bumpy ride but the conclusion is set in stone.
Yes
I'm getting aroused 🌭
https://dod.defense.gov/Portals/1/Documents/pubs/DoD%20Law%20of%20War%20Manual%20-%20June%202015%20Updated%20Dec%202016.pdf
exactly what I thought when he said it. 11.3 verifies as First Marker.
Think about it logically. The only way is the military. Fully controlled. Save & spread (once 11.3 verifies as 1st marker). Biggest advanced drop on Pol.
LAW OF WAR MANUAL https://dod.defense.gov/Portals/1/Documents/pubs/DoD%20Law%20of%20War%20Manual%20-%20June%202015%20Updated%20Dec%202016.pdf
Was there ever any doubt? I believe that - absolutely! Trump 2024 GUARANTEED! Thank you Mr. President!
The Law of War manual, as far as I can tell, has been a big nothing burger.
Feels a bit related as well:
https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/113301536483621969
Show support for President Donald J. Trump on Twitter.
https://x.com/realDonaldTrump
Maybe a landslide victory for Trump is all the military needs to put the final steps of the plan into action? Meaning they can start when he is declared the winner, not when he is inaugurated…
November 5th, 2024 and not January 20,2025?
They never thought Hillary would lose.
They never thought Patriots would remain peaceful.
We were supposed to raise hell so the UN Globalist troops which were mostly Chinese, to show up to help "keep the peace".
Wait till people see who the blood thirsty criminals actually are.
Correct, that will be part of the precipice. Nov 5th isn't when it's over.
The Lame Duck Period.
There are many ways this could play out, but DJT did once say at a rally (responding to a women in the crowd) that he would be back "...sooner than you think." It's possible the occupying force will be removed prior to 1/20/25.
Saddam Hussein did the same with all his oil wells. He knew how to hurt the real enemy.
I wonder about that as well, because he continually mentions Nov5, but never Jan20. Maybe he knows something we don’t. Maybe that something is the Brunson case.
ty i didn't know about the nero decree. this is what the BH have been doing for 4 years. hell since Reagan, with the help of the bushes.