1
Modeler42 1 point ago +1 / -0

So the man was told to stay standing during the time when everyone else was kneeling so that people watching could be made aware that what was happening was fake?

Who told him to stay standing?

1
Modeler42 1 point ago +1 / -0

Okay well...what do you think would have to be done in order to ensure mentally unstable people aren't able to get their hands on firearms?

Because if it's something you don't want, especially when it endangers otthers, we should work to find a solution to it, don't you think?

1
Modeler42 1 point ago +1 / -0

I wasn't aware that was the topic of discussion. I asked you about what compelled the man wearing the 33 jersey to stay standing.

You've done very well at changing the subject, but that's not a game I'm very interested in

1
Modeler42 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well that still goes back to how would you regulate banning them? Theoretically a person on medication can still go into a gun store and buy a gun. You can't ban them without requiring everyone to provide their medical records to gun clerks, including you and I

Do you want to submit your health records to every gun store you buy from?

1
Modeler42 1 point ago +1 / -0

A lot of people are going to AI to get answers just like they stupidly go to wikipedia

Yeah, and you're one of them

Stop sourcing shitty sources and share something meaningful

1
Modeler42 1 point ago +1 / -0

Nah that's a pretty common optical illusion.

But I notice that you don't really have an answer for the standing player. There would naturally be some explanation for how the player knew to stay standing. Was he just compelled? Is he in on it? Why haven't you asked these questions?

Do you just accept it and not ask anything?

1
Modeler42 1 point ago +1 / -0

If it's not credible, then it shouldn't be acknowledged.

Bob may be the source for bad information, but you're the one asking Bob these questions and then coming back to talk about what he said as if it's worth anything. Why go through the effort if Bob sucks?

1
Modeler42 1 point ago +1 / -0

Uh, no lol. I don't get your drift. Chat GPT is an AI program. It's not a source at all. That's insane that it should be seen as credible.

1
Modeler42 1 point ago +1 / -0

Right but...how would that be enforced? Would people have to submit their medical records to gun shops?

1
Modeler42 1 point ago +1 / -0

The user I replied to said that mentally people should not own firearms. How would that be enforced?

1
Modeler42 1 point ago +1 / -0

How can we ensure that only qualified people buy firearms? Right now, pretty much anyone can buy a gun without too much hassle

1
Modeler42 1 point ago +1 / -0

There's gotta be evidence of it first before it can be confirmed they were lying about this

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›