It's relevant to why people in the news are calling the group QAnon, that's all I'm explaining. The reason why is because people both on the inside and the outside referred to it as such.

they can have a fake anon go and shoot up a pizza parlor so that the whole thing can be made all about him instead of the content of what Q actually had to say

I'm confused...does "anon" just mean "people" in this context?

Isn't this all sort of a "no true scotsman" fallacy

Woah you really love posting this

Thanks for sending twice

I'm talking 2017

I'm aware of what was said in 2020. Up until then QAnon had been widely accepted by both outsiders and insiders as the name of the group. It's just how others address you

Most people don't really care about 4chan as a source. I mean a public one.

Before Q wrote that, there was a generally accepted term of the group, said by both outsiders and insiders. That name has stuck with the outsiders. They're still talking about you even if you don't call yourselves QAnon.

Emojis show up differently depending on the device you're using. A person reading it on an iPhone might see one color rabbit, and a person reading it on an Android might see a different color. Still, a person seeing it on a PC would see a third variation of a rabbit emoji.

Anyone can then take that screenshot and post it. I wouldn't read too much into it

More or less yeah. It's become the accepted name for the movement now.

I don't think I'm the only one. I'm just relaying factual history here, and a reason why people are still using the term QAnon. They don't care if it's what you prefer to be called. The general population knows the movement as QAnon. Unfortunately that's where marketing landed you.

What's this grey rabbit you're talking about?

Bud it was way early days. Nobody understood Q. I'm talking 2017. People called themselves QAnon and that's when it first was getting talked about. The name is going to stick with people who have since lost interest, because that's what it was once called. Unless there's some official statement made by some embodiment of person or people, which there won't be, by very nature of the "Anon" part, people are gonna call you the name that you had when it was still growing.

I mean it's just what people call it. It's like saying "I'm not the manager. I'm the head supervisor. There are no managers here." It's the same thing. People are just calling you a title you don't call yourselves.

There's Q, and there's Anon. There are Anon who follow Q, and Anon who don't follow Q. People came up with a distinction for the two.

Furthermore, in the early days when it was on reddit, people were calling themselves QAnon

There's a stickied thread currently with QAnon in the title.

If he doesn't deny it, as the first comment said, doesn't that mean there is a darker meaning?

Why would he lie?

This article is nearly 2 months old...is there really not that much to talk about?

So then based on that OP should recognize that both broke the law, not just Greiner

Twitter isn't a website like reddit, so you can't really draw the comparisons of how threads operate.

If a dude hits you, are you going to go along with it and say he wasn't hitting you just because the nearest retard says he didn't?

Nope

Too*

It's a good thing every man and every woman have the same shoulder to hip ratio, right?

You're really reaching bud.

Or a woman

Both persons broke Russian law, and both dumb laws.

Because he wasn't president when Greiner was detained

Based on what? Do you have a comparison?