Burdick v. United States (1915)

• The Supreme Court ruled that:

A pardon carries an imputation of guilt; acceptance is an admission of it.

• Meaning that accepting a pardon is legally considered an admission of guilt, unless explicitly denied. Therefore accepting a false pardon is like a confession under false pretenses so still usable if it was voluntary.

• This could be the way we get them. They all freely accepted these pardons believing they were real. They all admitted their guilt legally.

Imagine: The pardons get revoked, but the guilt still stays.

There have been a few people on here who have expressed belief that the Civil War was started because of State Rights and the Federal Government infringing on those rights.

This is provably false.

• The Southern Democrats actually wanted Federal intervention. They wanted to federalize slavery and give new federal protections for slave owners. When the Nothern Democrat's candidate won (who wanted slavery to remain a state by state issue) the Southern Democrats protested the vote.

There is no getting around this key evidence.

Key Points

• Research suggests Southern Democrats walked out of the 1860 Democratic National Convention due to disagreements over slavery protection in territories.

• The evidence leans toward the Civil War being more about slavery than states’ rights, given Southern demands for federal intervention. Background

• The 1860 Democratic National Convention, held in Charleston, South Carolina, saw a significant split between Northern and Southern Democrats, primarily over the issue of slavery. This event is crucial for understanding the political tensions leading to the Civil War.

• The Northern Democrats, especially during the antebellum period (pre-Civil War), were a faction of the Democratic Party that often supported the idea of “popular sovereignty.” This concept, championed by figures like Stephen Douglas, held that the decision to allow or prohibit slavery in a new state or territory should be left to the settlers of that region, rather than dictated by the federal government.

The Walkout

• Southern Democrats walked out because the convention failed to adopt a platform that included strong federal protection for slavery in the territories. They demanded that the federal government actively support slaveholders’ rights, which was at odds with the Northern Democrats’ preference for popular sovereignty, allowing territories to decide on slavery.

Implications for the Civil War

• This walkout challenges the myth that the Civil War was about states’ rights, as it shows the South sought federal intervention to protect slavery, not less federal involvement. This unexpected detail highlights how the conflict was rooted in slavery’s expansion, not just state autonomy.

Historical Context and Event Details

• The 1860 Democratic National Convention convened on April 23, 1860, in Charleston, South Carolina, a city emblematic of Southern interests and pro-slavery sentiment. The convention was marked by deep divisions within the Democratic Party, reflecting broader national tensions over slavery’s expansion into new territories. Stephen A. Douglas, a Northern Democrat, was the front-runner for the presidential nomination, advocating for popular sovereignty, which allowed territories to decide on slavery through local votes. This stance, however, was unacceptable to many Southern delegates, who sought a stronger federal guarantee for slavery’s protection.

• The Southern delegates, led by figures such as William Lowndes Yancey of Alabama, a prominent “Fire-Eater” and advocate for Southern rights, insisted on a platform that re-affirmed the 1856 Cincinnati platform and included explicit federal protection for slave property in the territories. This demand was rooted in recent legal and political developments, such as the 1857 Dred Scott decision, which suggested federal support for slavery in territories, and the ongoing debates over the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854, which had already inflamed sectional tensions.

Reasons for the Walkout

• The walkout occurred on April 30, 1860, when the convention failed to adopt the Southern-preferred platform. Historical records, including the official proceedings of the convention (Official proceedings of the Democratic National Convention, held in 1860, at Charleston and Baltimore), detail that the Southern delegates, particularly from states like Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas, withdrew because the adopted platform was seen as an “almost exclusive sectional vote,” not representing the majority and failing to embody Southern Democracy’s views on slavery. Key reasons included:

• The convention’s refusal to assert that territories could not legislate against slavery, a principle the Southern delegates deemed essential. The denial of the federal government’s duty to protect slave owners’ property in the territories, a stance they believed was constitutionally mandated. The Alabama delegation, for instance, was instructed by their state convention on January 11, 1860, to withdraw if the national platform did not align with their resolutions, which emphasized federal protection of slavery (Speech of the Hon. William L. Yancey, of Alabama). William Yancey’s speech on April 28, 1860, at the convention, is particularly illuminating. He appealed to the “sovereign states of the Union” to accept a Southern platform, warning of disunion if Northern Democrats did not protect Southern rights. His rhetoric underscored the Southern belief that federal action was necessary to safeguard slavery, contradicting the states’ rights narrative.

Analysis of the Walkout’s Meaning

• The walkout had profound implications for the Democratic Party and the nation. It led to a split, with the Northern Democrats nominating Douglas in a subsequent convention in Baltimore, while the Southern Democrats held their own convention and nominated John C. Breckinridge. This division contributed to Abraham Lincoln’s election, as the Democratic vote was fragmented, and ultimately to Southern secession and the Civil War.

• The event is critical for dispelling the myth that the Civil War was primarily about states’ rights. The Southern delegates’ demand for federal protection of slavery in the territories directly contradicts the idea that they sought to limit federal power. Instead, they advocated for federal intervention to enforce slavery, as seen in their support for measures like the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 and the Dred Scott decision. This demand for federalizing slavery — ensuring the federal government actively supported and protected the institution — undermines the states’ rights argument, which posits that states should have autonomy over such matters without federal interference.

Evidence Against the States’ Rights Myth

• Further evidence supporting this interpretation includes historical documents such as the Declaration of Causes of Seceding States, which emphasized federal failures to protect slavery rather than states’ rights (The Declaration of Causes of Seceding States). The Southern states’ insistence on federal enforcement of slavery, as seen in the Compromise of 1850, also highlights their willingness to use federal power when it served their interests. This pattern suggests that the Civil War was more about preserving and expanding slavery than defending state autonomy, aligning with the user’s observation that if it were truly about states’ rights, the South would not have sought federal intervention.

Conclusion

• The Southern Democrats’ walkout in 1860 was a pivotal moment that revealed their prioritization of federal protection for slavery over states’ rights. This event, documented in primary sources from the Library of Congress and other archives, provides compelling evidence that the Civil War was fundamentally about slavery, not state autonomy. By demanding federal intervention, the South contradicted the myth, aligning with the user’s intent to dispel it.

Key Citations

Official proceedings of the Democratic National Convention, held in 1860, at Charleston and Baltimore Speech of the Hon. William L. Yancey, of Alabama: delivered in the National Democratic convention, Charleston, April 28th, 1860 Library of Congress 1860 Democratic National Conventions

I remember biden only got 13 how many did trump get?

• Trump Wins, Rapid Reform and Great Awakening: Trump's victory initiates swift reform, with a “Great Awakening” sweeping the nation. High-profile arrests are made, leading to greater public trust in government. Key officials and influencers face accountability, and the political landscape undergoes a profound shift.

• Trump Wins, Financial Crisis Delays Reform: Trump’s win coincides with a severe economic downturn, forcing him to address financial stability before enacting broader changes. His administration focuses on restoring the economy, delaying other policy reforms until stability is achieved.

• Trump Wins, Contested Presidency Sparks Civil Unrest: Democrats dispute Trump’s eligibility and refuse to certify the election, leading to a prolonged legal and political battle. The unresolved conflict results in protests, social divides, and, potentially, civil strife as citizens rally around opposing sides.

• Trump Wins, Federal Push for Media and Tech Reforms: With Trump back in office, his administration takes aim at large tech corporations and media conglomerates, pushing for regulations that limit censorship, promote data privacy, and increase transparency in news reporting.

• Trump Wins, Constitutional Amendments on the Horizon: Trump’s return inspires a push for constitutional amendments focused on electoral integrity, limits on federal power, and mechanisms to prevent future political crises. Citizens advocate for greater local autonomy, and several states begin campaigns for amendments.

• Trump Wins, U.S. and Allies Strengthen Ties: Trump rebuilds alliances with conservative-leaning foreign nations, leading to robust trade deals and a united front on certain global issues. The U.S. develops stronger defense and trade alliances, particularly with countries sharing similar values.

• Trump Loses, Fraud Evidence Leads to Reinstatement: Evidence of election fraud is uncovered and publicly accepted, leading to Trump’s reinstatement as president. This dramatic turn triggers high-profile arrests and legal actions, fundamentally reshaping public trust in the electoral system.

• Trump Loses, But Establishes “Parallel Economy”: With Trump out of office, his supporters rally around the creation of an alternative economy, building independent social media platforms, financial systems, and corporate networks to bypass traditional institutions and promote conservative values.

• Trump Loses, but Key States Implement Election Reform: Trump’s loss sparks a wave of state-level election reforms, with states passing new regulations on voting procedures, audits, and election transparency. The resulting policies create a patchwork of voting laws across the nation, reflecting each state's political climate.

• Trump Loses, Fraud Evidence but 2020 Repeats: Fraud is exposed, but the results are left unchanged, echoing the aftermath of 2020. Kamala Harris assumes office as a continuation of Biden’s policies, creating dissatisfaction among Trump supporters. Some states respond with calls for stricter local election laws.

• Trump Loses, Great Reset Agenda: With Kamala Harris as president, the administration pushes forward the “Great Reset” agenda, enacting policies focused on large-scale economic restructuring, environmental measures, and social reforms that reshape the role of government in daily life.

• Trump Loses, Supreme Court and States Take Action: Conservative legal cases flood the Supreme Court, which issues rulings that alter the balance of power between states and the federal government. Simultaneously, several states move to adopt conservative policies on education, healthcare, and individual freedoms.

• Trump Loses, Military and Foreign Policy Shifts Intensify: Under the new administration, military involvement in global affairs increases. Public concern over these actions leads to intensified debates on foreign policy, defense spending, and the role of the U.S. abroad.

• Third-Party Momentum Grows, Regardless of Outcome: Dissatisfaction with both major parties leads to a surge in third-party support, prompting calls for new political movements and alternative candidates. Independent organizations gain traction, changing the dynamics of future elections and political alliances.

Im trying to find clinical info on gardasil I remember a lomg time ago beimg told it was a repurposed drug but cant find it anymore. Also I need info on if it causes infertility.

HOW TO TREAT YOURSELF FROM MONKEYPOX (From my own research)

• 1. Inhibition of Viral Entry and Attachment

Flavonoids

• Most Flavonoids and other phytochemicals, have a very low absorption rate between 0 and 5% Purchasing nano or liposomal versions along with peperine enhances absorption to nearly 100%

  • Quercetin

    • Mechanism: Quercetin interferes with the virus's ability to bind to and enter host cells. It can stabilize cell membranes and block viral adhesion.
    • Dosage: 500-1,000 mg/day, divided into 2-3 doses. Higher doses may be used in acute situations under professional supervision.
    • Toxicity: Generally well-tolerated. High doses may cause gastrointestinal upset, headache, or fatigue. Long-term high doses could impact kidney function.
    • Cautions: Can interact with certain medications, including blood thinners (e.g., warfarin) and some antibiotics, potentially affecting their efficacy.

  • Catechins (e.g., Epigallocatechin Gallate - EGCG)

    • Mechanism: EGCG prevents the attachment of viruses to host cells and inhibits viral entry. It also has anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties.
    • Dosage: 200-400 mg/day. Higher doses may be considered for acute symptoms with medical guidance.
    • Toxicity: Typically safe in moderate doses. High doses may affect liver function or cause gastrointestinal disturbances. May interact with anticoagulant medications.
    • Cautions: EGCG can interact with anticoagulants and antiplatelet drugs, increasing bleeding risk. It may also affect the absorption of some medications.

• 2. Disruption of Viral Replication

Saponins

• Ginsenosides (from Panax Ginseng)
  • Mechanism: Ginsenosides can inhibit viral replication by disrupting viral enzyme activities and modulating the host cell’s antiviral responses. They also enhance the immune response.
  • Dosage: 200-400 mg/day. Acute dosing should be managed by a healthcare professional.
  • Toxicity: Generally safe. High doses may cause insomnia, nervousness, gastrointestinal issues, or affect blood sugar levels.
  • Cautions: Ginsenosides may interact with anticoagulants, diabetes medications, and immunosuppressants. Use cautiously with other supplements that affect blood sugar or immune function.

Tannins

• Ellagic Acid
  • Mechanism: Ellagic acid inhibits viral replication by blocking viral RNA/protein synthesis. It also has antioxidant properties that protect host cells from damage.
  • Dosage: 100-300 mg/day. Acute treatment may involve higher doses under medical supervision.
  • Toxicity: Usually well-tolerated. High doses might cause gastrointestinal issues or allergic reactions. Limited data on long-term high-dose safety.
  • Cautions: Can inhibit the absorption of certain minerals (e.g., iron). Caution is advised if taken with iron supplements or medications affecting mineral absorption.

• 3. Modulation of Immune Response

Terpenes

• Limonene

  • Mechanism: Limonene enhances immune function and has direct antiviral properties. It may help modulate inflammatory responses and support overall immune health.
  • Dosage: 250-500 mg/day. Acute treatment should involve careful dosing.
  • Toxicity: Generally safe at recommended doses. High doses may cause gastrointestinal issues or skin irritation.
  • Cautions: Limonene may interact with medications metabolized by the liver’s cytochrome P450 enzymes. Caution is advised if taking drugs processed by these enzymes.

• Thymol

  • Mechanism: Thymol boosts immune function and exhibits direct antiviral activity, potentially reducing viral load and inflammation.
  • Dosage: Typically used in topical applications at concentrations of 0.5%-2%. Oral or high doses should be managed carefully.
  • Toxicity: Essential oil can be irritating. High doses may lead to nausea, vomiting, or liver toxicity. Use cautiously in children or during pregnancy.
  • Cautions: Avoid excessive use, particularly with other irritants or in sensitive individuals.

• 4. Protease Inhibition

Glycyrrhizin (from Licorice Root)

• Mechanism: Glycyrrhizin inhibits viral proteases, crucial for viral maturation and replication. It can reduce viral load and enhance the host’s antiviral response.
• Dosage: 100-400 mg/day. Acute situations might require higher doses under supervision.
• Toxicity: Long-term or high doses can cause hypertension, hypokalemia, and fluid retention. Not recommended for individuals with cardiovascular issues, high blood pressure, or renal problems.
• Cautions: Glycyrrhizin may interact with antihypertensive medications, diuretics, and corticosteroids. Caution is needed for those with cardiovascular issues or on medications affecting blood pressure.

Quercetin

• Mechanism: Quercetin, a flavonoid found in many fruits and vegetables, has multiple bioactive effects, including antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and antiviral properties.

• Antioxidant Action: Neutralizes free radicals, reducing oxidative stress and protecting cells.

• Anti-inflammatory Action: Inhibits inflammatory pathways and reduces cytokine production.

• Antiviral Action: Interferes with viral replication by blocking viral entry and modulating host cell responses.

• Indirect Protease Inhibition: While not a direct protease inhibitor, quercetin may affect viral protease activity indirectly by modulating cellular pathways involved in viral replication. This can influence the processing of viral proteins necessary for replication.

  • Cautions: High doses may cause gastrointestinal discomfort.

• 5. Anthelmintic Properties

Wormwood (Artemisia absinthium)

• Mechanism: Contains artemisinin and other compounds with antiviral and antiparasitic properties. It may interfere with viral replication and modulate immune responses.
• Dosage: Typically 200-400 mg/day of standardized extract. For acute treatment, dosages may vary, and professional guidance is essential.
• Toxicity: Generally safe in recommended doses. High doses may cause nausea, vomiting, or neurological effects. Prolonged use can be toxic.
• Cautions: Combining wormwood with anthelmintics like ivermectin or fenbendazole may increase the risk of adverse effects or toxicity. Wormwood may also interact with drugs metabolized by the liver’s cytochrome P450 system.

Garlic (Allium sativum)

• Mechanism: Contains allicin, which has antimicrobial, antiviral, and anthelmintic properties. It supports immune responses and disrupts the metabolism of pathogens.
• Dosage: 600-1,200 mg of aged garlic extract daily. Acute treatment might involve higher doses with medical advice.
• Toxicity: Generally safe. High doses may cause gastrointestinal upset, heartburn, or allergic reactions.
• Cautions: Garlic can enhance the effects of anticoagulants (e.g., warfarin), increasing bleeding risk. Use with caution if on blood thinners or undergoing surgery.

Black Walnut (Juglans nigra)

• Mechanism: Contains juglone, which exhibits anthelmintic and antimicrobial properties. It disrupts the metabolic processes of parasites and pathogens.
• Dosage: Typically 500-1,000 mg/day in extract form. Acute treatment dosages should be managed by a healthcare provider.
• Toxicity: Generally safe but can cause gastrointestinal discomfort. High doses may lead to liver toxicity and allergic reactions.
• Cautions: Black walnut may interact with anticoagulants and medications metabolized by the liver. Caution is advised if taking other drugs that affect liver metabolism.

Ivermectin

• Mechanism: Binds to parasite muscle and nerve cells, causing paralysis and death. Ivermectin may also exhibit some antiviral effects by inhibiting viral replication.
• Dosage: Typically 150-200 µg/kg body weight, administered as a single dose. Dosage may vary based on specific indications and should be adjusted according to clinical guidance.
• Toxicity: Generally well-tolerated. High doses or prolonged use may cause dizziness, gastrointestinal issues, or neurological effects.
• Cautions: Caution advised when used with other medications that affect liver enzymes, as it can interact with drugs metabolized by cytochrome P450.

Fenbendazole

• Mechanism: Disrupts the parasite’s microtubule formation, leading to its death. Fenbendazole also has potential antiviral effects by affecting viral replication.
• Dosage: Commonly 10-50 mg/kg body weight per day, typically for 3 days. Dosage may vary based on clinical indications.
• Toxicity: Generally safe at recommended doses. High doses may cause gastrointestinal upset or liver issues.
• Cautions: Use with caution if combined with other drugs that affect liver metabolism. Limited data on interactions with other medications.

Purchase Links from what I take and know works.

• 1. Nano Cucumin: https://a.co/d/cACbW0s
• 2. Nano EGCG: https://a.co/d/1ccmzo6
• 3. Nano Quercetin: https://a.co/d/b7LT41d
• 4. Fenbendazole: https://fenben.pro/product/fenbendazol-powder/

Peer reviewed sources (Mostly Meta-Analyses)

• 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph17060692
• 2. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2021.606782
• 3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcp.2016.09.029
• 4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rechem.2023.101013
• 5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nutos.2021.12.004
• 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics15020348
• 7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11101-023-09855-2

Links showing Kamala being a border czar:

Definition of Czar

... a person who has been appointed by the government to deal with a particular problem that is affecting the country.

Examples

• whitehouse

• AP

• BBC

• CBS News

• CNN

• Politico

• NyTimes

• I know Q said he was dead.
• I am one of the most skeptical on here when it comes to people and actors.
• Whenever someone claims that person A is actually person B I test it against a forensic technique called facial wrinkle mapping.
• Here is the results: https://i.ibb.co/282Sz25/JFKJR.png
• Here is a photomorph based on those results:https://3dthis.com/play.htm?h=MTQ4NTMyOA
• Pay attention to the fine lines, and the blemishes.

• notice the unique tuff he has on the top of his eyebrow and how they both have that?
• notice the flat tragus on the ear
• Notice that his fine wrinkles when he was young matches the deep wrinkles of this old person.
• Notice the several blemishes that all match on the other face.
• take a look at the blemish in the center of the bridge of his nose and how it appears on both images

Just found out my sister took him to the hospital.

• His name is David

• He has Edema, shortness of breath and a low oxygen saturation.

• He is unvaxxed.

• He is a heavy smoker.

• He just traveled to see his parents.

• I am assuming its either pneumonia or heart failure.

• Edit 1: He is getting a CAT scan right now.
• Edit 2. found a mass inside his lungs. He is admitted
• Edit 3. It's stage 4 lung cancer.

This is how cancer grows and how to fight it.

• Aerobic Glycolysis (Warburg Effect): In normal cells, glucose is metabolized through a process called aerobic respiration, which involves glycolysis followed by the citric acid cycle and oxidative phosphorylation in the mitochondria. However, cancer cells tend to favor glycolysis even in the presence of oxygen, leading to the production of lactate as a byproduct. This allows cancer cells to generate energy rapidly, support their high proliferation rates, and adapt to the microenvironment of tumors.

• Lactate Fermentation: In addition to aerobic glycolysis, cancer cells may also rely on lactate fermentation. This involves the conversion of pyruvate, a product of glycolysis, into lactate. This process helps regenerate the cofactor NAD+ (nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide), which is required for glycolysis to continue. Lactate fermentation can occur under both aerobic and anaerobic conditions, contributing to the metabolic flexibility of cancer cells.

• Oxidative Phosphorylation (OXPHOS): Some cancers rely on oxidative phosphorylation for energy production rather than aerobic glycolysis. This is more typical in certain tumor types and can involve efficient utilization of mitochondrial function.

• Glutamine Metabolism: Glutamine is an amino acid that cancer cells can use as an alternative substrate for energy production and as a source of carbon and nitrogen for biomass synthesis. Some cancer cells exhibit high dependence on glutamine metabolism.

• Fatty Acid Oxidation (FAO): In addition to glycolysis, cancer cells may enhance fatty acid oxidation to meet their energy needs. This is particularly relevant in certain cancers where lipid metabolism is upregulated. This could be a problem for ketogenic diet solutions as it increase Fatty Acid availability in the body. This is why a meat based diet which is higher in proteins and lower in fats than typical keto diet is recommended.

• SOLUTION: A carnivore ketogenic diet + Fasting, which involves low carbohydrate intake and increased consumption of fats, can hinder aerobic glycolysis in cancer cells.
• The rationale behind this lies in the reduced availability of glucose, a primary substrate for glycolysis. Secondarily, it induces Glycogen Depletion. the body will shift its energy metabolism away from glucose utilization toward the breakdown of glycogen and fatty acids.
• As glucose levels decrease, the rate of glycolysis and, consequently, lactate fermentation may decrease.
• Some studies suggest that a ketogenic diet may influence mitochondrial function, potentially affecting oxidative phosphorylation.
• Fasting has been associated with an increase in the utilization of glutamine by certain tissues, including the liver and immune cells. This adaptation may provide an additional energy source during periods of nutrient scarcity.
• Switching to Keto and fasting may cause mitochondrial Stress: Increased reliance on oxidative metabolism might place stress on mitochondria, potentially leading to the induction of apoptosis (programmed cell death) in cancer cells with mitochondrial dysfunction

• Cautionary Note:

• Enhanced Fatty Acid Availability: A ketogenic diet increases circulating fatty acids, which could potentially provide more substrate for FAO, and this may support the growth of certain cancers that thrive on fatty acid metabolism.

• Ketone Body Utilization: Some cancer cells may adapt to utilize ketone bodies as an energy source, potentially sustaining their growth even under conditions of reduced glucose availability.

• It is important to lookup and learn what type of cancer you or your loved one has, and what mechanisms your cancer uses for growth.

• CONCLUSION: No Manipulation Detected.

• NOTE: This doesn't mean it wasn't manipulated. It means at least with this software is was not detected.

• I've downloaded the audio from https://videos.dailymail.co.uk/preview/mol/2024/01/23/4186753578982030593/636x382_MP4_4186753578982030593.mp4

EDIT: it appears the video link no longer works. Another link would have to be used for those that would like to test.

• I am using an audio authenticator forensics software from: https://github.com/Gabriel-Desharnais/audio-forensic-authentication
• This software does tampering detection: Digital audio tampering detection can be used to verify the authenticity of digital audio.
• I then ran this though the software and it did not detect anything noticeably altered.

In my previous experience, I have conducted extensive analysis on the facial features of Biden through the use of forensic facial wrinkle mapping techniques. These methods have proven to be equally reliable as fingerprinting methods and operate on a similar principle. It is worth noting that facial wrinkle mapping cannot be replicated in an imperceptible way through the use of masks, surgery, or makeup. Thus, I challenge anyone who posits the notion that Biden is a clone, an impersonator, or anyone other than the original individual, to provide evidence that matches or surpasses the credibility of forensic facial wrinkle mapping. For instance, the application of forensic audio analysis could be considered.

• 40+ point facial analysis visualization
• gif of images used
• Ear specific gif
• Additional research findings suggest that Biden may have undergone cosmetic procedures. Multiple plastic surgeons have made observations regarding his appearance. Dr. Steven Davis stated that based on photos taken over the years, it appears that Biden had a facelift at least a year ago, as evidenced by scars along the ear cartilage. Similarly, Dr. Barry Cohen mentioned that Biden had hair transplants in the past, which required subsequent adjustments to his frontal hairline. Dr. Cohen also speculated that Biden likely receives regular Botox injections and possibly filler. He further noted that such procedures are now common and not subjected to much scrutiny. For reference, I have included an image illustrating excessive scarring from a facelift, as well as a facelift gallery that showcases different outcomes, including earlobe attachment.
• face lift scar
• Earlobe attachment due to facelift
• many are not aware that biden has a malformed right upper ear
• additionally his right ear is attached while the left one is not.

We are approaching our childs 1 year mark and the doctor will be pushing a few vaccines on us. I am preparing a list of DOI links and resources on why. Here are the vaccines they will try and push.

• Covid19
• Flu
• Hep-A
• MMR
• PCV
• HIB

I am righting reasons for each vaccine as to why we arent getting them. Like clinical trial data, studies etc. And a DOI or link to each reason. I would like it to be a compelling as possible Ant help would be appreciated

If I were evil i would.

• Make a virus and unleash it on the world.
• Make a vaxxine that weakens and slow kills those that take it.
• do this a few time making it clear that the vax only harms.
• now we know who complies and who doesnt. We have seperated the sheep from the rams.
• unleash a virsus woth a 100% death rate, and unleash a vaccine that works against it but it works in tandem withr he covid vax poison.
• let those that risisted vaxxines die and those that always comply live as weakened slaves.

• 1. Anger TDS
• 2. Envy Equity Movement
• 3. Gluttony Body Positivity Movement
• 4. Greed Liberal Taxation
• 5. Lust LGBTQ
• 6. Pride Pride month
• 7. Sloth Democratic socialism

This is just a list of news sites claiming Russia/Ukraine and a dirty bomb. Ots possible this could be nothing but it also could be conditioning for their plan to bomb Ukraine and blame Russia.

• https://web.archive.org/web/20230104211040/https://www.cnn.com/2022/10/25/europe/dirty-bomb-russia-ukraine-explainer-intl-hnk/index.html
• https://web.archive.org/web/20230709143650/https://www.bbc.com/news/world-63373637.amp
• https://web.archive.org/web/20230709143821/https://www.defense.gov/News/News-Stories/Article/Article/3199422/general-says-use-of-dirty-bomb-would-bring-consequences/
• https://web.archive.org/web/20230709143948/https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/russia-ukraine-dirty-bomb-what-to-know-rcna53844
• https://web.archive.org/web/20230709144447/https://www.arabnews.com/node/2186821/amp

• Trump is a funny dude. He also writes with double or triple entendre. I can imagine something like this happening: (not good at impersonation)

The Dirty Democrat Swamp In New York is trying to storm the police on me with the Stormy, stormy Danials. They arent just storming me. My fellow Americans, the storm is upon us.