This is true if we do know for a fact how severe it is, but there aren't enough cases to know yet.
It makes us all look like idiots and I think there are people on this forum that do it on purpose, they post sensational headlines and screenshots they know will get people worked up then run with it. If it's false, they shrug and post the next false thing over and over again. Meanwhile everyone here has the memory of a goldfish and just gets angry about the next link that is also false. We're all kept fat and busy.
Yet here we are what? He's just making up numbers that are not in that article. What he is saying is just wrong.
Did you actually read the article? They say outer lips several times.
I can't believe I'm debating this with strangers on the internet and this gets to my exact point here. Penisse, the poster who posted this, posts these stupid articles that get stickied and people argue over them instead of doing actual research into a global elitist cabal that is kidnapping children and stealing elections.
We're doing exactly what they want us to do.
Actually it's not. He's misreading the data and changes it to meet his needs. He says that the total sample size is 824, but then if you remove 700 of them (for some reason?) you have 124 left. The 100 miscarriages in the group then means that it is Eighty Percent.
That's like saying I have 10 cheeseburgers in front of me. One of them has shit instead of a hamburger patty. That means 10% of cheeseburgers are actually shit sandwiches. Now if we remove eight hamburgers for no particular reason, that means 1 out of 2 are shit sandwiches. That means 50% of all sandwiches are actually shit sandwiches!
It's called misrepresenting data.
We all know the vax is a death shot and horrible, but don't just make stuff up to make it look bad. But, I'm guessing that's not what he's doing, he probably thinks he's actually being clever and uncovering information instead of just making stuff up.
I spent about two hours last night looking, but couldn't find anything but this guy saying it's true, no research, no actual study. He mentions a paper, but it doesn't seem to exist and he is just misreading the one he's looking at. If you listen to what he says, he just doesn't understand what he's reading.
I tried that stuff for a while, it helped for a few months but then stopped doing anything, I'll have to try the DMSO, my sister was using it after her mastectomy and said it helped.
I'm not voting until the machines are fixed, it's not worth it.
It's really not a big deal, I just drink more water and slap some lotion on for a few weeks until I adjust to the heating being back on. It happens every year.
Also weirdly my scars get really dry, I have two bullet holes leftover from Afghanistan and they get crazy dry and itchy!
Oh man, you got 'em!
That's not what it says.
You need to stop watching infowars, it's controlled opposition
That literally says the opposite.
Maybe, but that evidence isn't clear.
My grandfather died of skin cancer in 1968, what are you even talking about?
Who is talking about global warming? I'm talking about the heat in my house.
10-15% of women have miscarriages normally, that's just a fact. My wife and I had two before our first kid was born.
This isn't an article, it's a letter to the editors. They publish these to drive further discussion with no comment on the science involved.
That being said, the dude is spot on, it will be interesting to see how the editors react.
But they're not being held in DC.
It really doesn't. Theres no real source given.
Do you have a non bitchute link to this?
We all know the vaxx is deadly, but is there more context because 10 to 15 in 100 pregnancies (10 to 15 percent) end in miscarriage in the United States.
I'd rather hear an update on what's going on with Lindell's SCOTUS briefing.