1
ObjectiveReality 1 point ago +1 / -0

Over $1.5 trillion was repatriated into the United States from overseas.

Wow

1
ObjectiveReality 1 point ago +1 / -0

They charge you $1,000, that's not what it costs. And it's not what they charge others. The US subsidizes the health care costs of the rest of the world.

1
ObjectiveReality 1 point ago +1 / -0

Pinephone ($150) has switches that physically disconnect the modem, wifi, mic, cameras. It runs on linux so no google, microsoft, or apple stealing all your metadata.

1
ObjectiveReality 1 point ago +1 / -0

Consider this option: Pinephone $150

  • Physical switches to physically disconnect mic/camera/wifi/modem(cell)

  • Linux based (no microsoft/google/apple surveillance)

  • Developed by people against the creeping fingers of big tech

1
ObjectiveReality 1 point ago +1 / -0

ending the pursuit of objectivity

REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

5
ObjectiveReality 5 points ago +5 / -0

The power isn't Trumps but rather that of the executive. He just normally is the senior member of that branch. Since his term is up let's go through the succession:

1 President Term is up, Biden is illegitimate

2 Vice President Term is up, Harris is illegitimate

3 President Pro Tempore of the Senate Needs to be voted on, hasn't, that vote wouldn't be legitimate anyways due to treasonous voters (ie treasonous senators)

4 Secretary of State - Mike Pompeo

5 Secretary of Defense - Christopher Miller

SoS doesn't have a term limit, they persist until replaced. And if Biden is illegitimate then his picks are as well. So Pompeo is still the Secretary of State. (And if not Pompeo, then next up is SoD)

So if The military DOES make a move, It is Pompeo's (or Miller's) shoulders that the duty to head the Executive would fall on (whether he wanted it or not) and he would be the man to ensure EOs were put in motion.

(is my thinking)

23
ObjectiveReality 23 points ago +23 / -0

In BOTH todays speech AND yesterdays he kept highlighting his death, his legacy and how he wanted to be remembered. That's not a man who is confident in tomorrow.

7
ObjectiveReality 7 points ago +7 / -0

I've been doing a lot of thinking along these lines as well.

The cabal having a deadman's switch - nucs, bioweapon, infrastructure hacking -- you have to secure all that first. I figured we HAD secured it, but apparently we don't.

I think the 6th rattled the left more than we think. False flag and all that sure, but they were rattled. I don't think anyone but their guys were supposed to be there. I don't think they were ever supposed to evacuate. I don't think they were ever expecting that many people storming and inside. And I definitely don't think having their laptops and hard drives stolen was part of the plan either. Nancy was livid. "protestors" neatly spray painted her home with anarchist symbols and pig blood, and she's like whatevs because THAT'S false. But this got her off her rocker.

So I think they threatened Trump with something the group hadn't yet accounted for. At least, that's one theory that explains events.

4
ObjectiveReality 4 points ago +4 / -0

I don't think the military is sworn to protect how things look.

And how does it look better when they do it tomorrow, or in a week, or a month?

8
ObjectiveReality 8 points ago +8 / -0

once he was sworn in, the government became illegitimate (belligerent) and the military is now responsible for restoring legitimate civilian government

Fine. I agree with everything. So what's the reason you don't act at 12:01pm when you had months to prepare?

1
ObjectiveReality 1 point ago +1 / -0

I can't imagine why, if your goal was to affect arrests, what value there would be in delaying much longer. Arguments, whether good or bad, can be made to wait until they "complete" the steal, and can be made to wait until uninvolved parties are no longer in the crossfire -- but what are the arguments for waiting longer than that?

Without such an argument, it needs to be dismissed that arrests from the militray side are coming.

Which means either the plan doesn't involve arrests (what? What then??) or any plans have been defeated.

So, what are the arguments for waiting? Best I've heard is the same for why they didn't roll up on people years ago, that the string pullers have their own equivalent of 'dead mans switches' that are still live or they have lost accountability for. Until we the people are safe, you can't make a move.

1
ObjectiveReality 1 point ago +1 / -0

Value must be created, it can not be printed into existence. The purchasing power, the share of goods that paper entitles you to can only be taken from somewhere else, because the amount of goods hasn't changed. You can not "print" more food, homes, cars, clothes, or electronics.

That money is stolen value from all other existing money, it is stolen from the value of your next paycheck, from the value of your stocks, or other investments, it is another shackle placed around the neck of your children, with the chains held by the same private bankers that hold the chains to yours.

1
ObjectiveReality 1 point ago +1 / -0

If the military is as compromised at the top as the CIA, FBI, Congress, Courts, Governor, Legislatures, Media and LEOs... how would we know? What would be a good sign?

by Sharker
5
ObjectiveReality 5 points ago +5 / -0

Infuriating if true, yet literally who

4
ObjectiveReality 4 points ago +4 / -0

The moment before the orders came from Washington that we'd be crossing the river at night, every soldier whose heart was drained of faith stood around, freezing, believing that the end was near.

Everyone remembers the moment, and never the moment right before.

History didn't care that they did or didn't keep faith, but those who did keep it lived a simpler and happier life through out.

5
ObjectiveReality 5 points ago +5 / -0

Trump just declared us all Sovereign Citizens you guys!!

3
ObjectiveReality 3 points ago +3 / -0

You sound like the kind of person who loves Return of the Jedi and skips the Empire Strikes Back,

2
ObjectiveReality 2 points ago +2 / -0

We are safe, you are safe, that's a large part of the prerequisite for moving.

1
ObjectiveReality 1 point ago +1 / -0

I follow up EVERY lead.

I review source documents, and NEVER stop at a headline.

My hard drives, plural, are filled with leaks, files, charging and sentencing docs, hundreds of hours of testimony, most of which I have personally reviewed, to great extent if not fully.

And I dismissed Q. Because I looked into it very early, could not verify any of it, and saw it as the disinfo distraction it made more sense to be at the time. I erred in never, NEVER following up on it again. Until a few days ago as well.

I lent the weight of tongue and keyboard against your position FOR YEARS and I am sorry to each of you for doing so, but take solace that perhaps, the more Q stayed under the radar the better off it was to be.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›