7
PaucaSedMatura 7 points ago +7 / -0

This was delightfully unexpected (DEEZ NUTS never stops being funny to me!), a sort of verbal pie-in-the-face to these libtards. But i would have played a longer game here if I were that Project Veritas journalist. Getting a damaging tell-all interview with AOC should have been the goal here.

It seems so easy for PV to do this because these people are so narcissistic, and they know exactly how to play that to their advantage.

5
PaucaSedMatura 5 points ago +5 / -0

Why are they always beating drums? It's so gay.

1
PaucaSedMatura 1 point ago +1 / -0

ACTACUAALLY, iT wAs fLAvOR-AiDE!

2
PaucaSedMatura 2 points ago +2 / -0

I prefer none at all, but to each their own!

1
PaucaSedMatura 1 point ago +1 / -0

To answer, you'll have to explain what it means for a set of pixels to have a "cellular makeup as [in] a living person". Your question doesn't really follow based on my earlier tounge-in-cheek (but factual) statement about pixels vs. proteins.

Perhaps you're asking about the eventuality of finding a living person that bears a strong resemblance to one of the generated images. That would depend on a totally subjective observation, and you would always be able to take any number of photos of the alleged real subject showing discrepancies with the generated one.

1
PaucaSedMatura 1 point ago +1 / -0

how do we know for sure that the person doesn’t exist just because it’s a computer generated image of a human? What is the probability of the AI generating a human that does exist?

You can verify that by running the code yourself on your computer and comparing the output images with the methods (code) used to generate them.

After a few seconds of loading the page, you'll see some information displayed about the image:

Imagined by a GAN (generative adversarial network) StyleGAN2 (Dec 2019) - Karras et al. and Nvidia Don't panic. Learn how it works [1] [2] [3] Help this AI continue to dream | Contact me Code for training your own [original] [simple] [light] Art • Cats • Horses • Chemicals Another

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u8qPvzk0AfY https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dCKbRCUyop8 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SWoravHhsUU

https://github.com/NVlabs/stylegan2 https://github.com/lucidrains/stylegan2-pytorch https://github.com/lucidrains/lightweight-gan

As for the question of "what is the probability of the AI generating a human that does exist?" ... i'd say the probably is precisely 0.0 since you're looking at pixels and not proteins. ;)

1
PaucaSedMatura 1 point ago +1 / -0

They think this is still a R vs. D fight - they are way behind.

8
PaucaSedMatura 8 points ago +8 / -0

"LET"S SMOKE SOME POT!"

(it's my first post, sry)

view more: ‹ Prev