5
PelosisCellMate 5 points ago +5 / -0

I wish you would've screenshotted it.... Gab just buffers for days here in FL.

5
PelosisCellMate 5 points ago +5 / -0

because 20,000 soldiers isn't enough...

If she really requested additional personal security then she's a fucking kook

1
PelosisCellMate 1 point ago +1 / -0

The same man who gets rich yelling about gay frogs is saying Q is Psyop.

Isn't he worried some gay frogs are going to get him? He should keep runnin

4
PelosisCellMate 4 points ago +4 / -0

I meant it in the way that Q left behind clues and we are following the clues, not him directly. But yeh you get it.

3
PelosisCellMate 3 points ago +3 / -0

Beyond that it seems we need to wait until 1/23 I think was the next time he's referenced.

1
PelosisCellMate 1 point ago +1 / -0

3 year "variation of a variable" it's been 3 years since he posted it; if you're on this board you should understand the significance of that.

2
PelosisCellMate 2 points ago +2 / -0

What timezone are you in? Q always uses EST. Whitehouse is in EST. It was posted at 6:02 EST, not 11:02 EST.

1
PelosisCellMate 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'd love to read but....

Well, congress refused the 2k stimulus and my broke ass can't afford the paywall.

Mind quoting the meat n bones?

4
PelosisCellMate 4 points ago +4 / -0

There's other posts on here from like 3 hours ago about that.

It reads to me like US about to sanction the living hell out of china though.

3
PelosisCellMate 3 points ago +3 / -0

Were US and china (or russia as this article claims) were at the brink of war that could easily become WW3... But I agree the title is somewhat fearporn due to the speculative nature.

1
PelosisCellMate 1 point ago +1 / -0

A. You're complaining about nothing happening before the time that this post implies something would happen.

B. I never directly said something would happen, I did however make what's known as a CONDITIONAL STATEMENT. Let me requote it, notice the word "if" If this Jack prediction is anything like other Q proofs then something massive should happen at precisely the 3 year delta.

2
PelosisCellMate 2 points ago +2 / -0

Very true, but I still think something might happen at 10:48 given the mccain proof.

9
PelosisCellMate 9 points ago +9 / -0

"Future proves past" If this Jack prediction is anything like other Q proofs then something massive should happen at precisely the 3 year delta.

The essay tweets didn't match the time and I don't feel it is equivalent of being "biblical" as we've told it would be.

2
PelosisCellMate 2 points ago +2 / -0

... this was posted 5 minutes ago on my end. Time changes. Yes.

11
PelosisCellMate 11 points ago +11 / -0

What's more then that is his tweet storm all occurred within 2 minutes.

That's a lot of paragraphs to tweet in less than 2 mins

1
PelosisCellMate 1 point ago +1 / -0

The only one that opens the way he did is #34.

I was he had said 55 tho... Look to Twitter: Exactly this: "My fellow Americans, the Storm is upon us......." God bless.

5
PelosisCellMate 5 points ago +5 / -0

Care to fill me in? Who's name?

Edit : Just read wiki about him. :/ Makes me think about Harrison Deal... Deep state needs to be punished...

by Hooji2
4
PelosisCellMate 4 points ago +4 / -0

This speech at this point is kinda old news...

But yeah, Pompeo graduated WestPoint first in his class also graduated Harvard law school, this man isn't a simpleton and that phrasing was not a mistake.

4
PelosisCellMate 4 points ago +4 / -0

I'd take his form of protesting over 2020's protesting any day.

That being said, you're judging him by the content of his character; he would be proud. :)

3
PelosisCellMate 3 points ago +4 / -1

Pompeo recently shared a pic of him standing with Gina and Trump.

I got some real hate on here when I shared that, but I feel Pompeo was saying she's with him. Either in custody or co-operation. https://twitter.com/SecPompeo/status/1345097467965140993/photo/1 I could be wrong and it's just a meaningless photo op... but I don't think Pompeo does meaningless things.

2
PelosisCellMate 2 points ago +2 / -0

MrsMason was referring to Washington and California ect.

States that may or may not still have active FEMA emergencies due to wildfires.

2
PelosisCellMate 2 points ago +2 / -0

I agree. you'd imagine she'd be speaking daily to any press that will hear her, i don't doubt that at all. I'm just saying that she has been in public (as far as the public can tell) and I'm a little on a speculative side with everything... until hard evidence comes out I'll have doubt.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›