1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

The appropriate term for Indians is Natives.

This ain't hard people.

"Cleveland Natives"

4
Questionable 4 points ago +4 / -0

If you open up the link in private window using Firefox. You can quickly hit the escape key and cancel the page from hiding the contents.

Or you can select the small portion of visible text, select all, copy paste into .txt file.

Though the only real information given is in that intro stub, that links to a recent letter acknowledging Durham's report will inevitably be released.

1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

Deleted comments remain, showing as deleted. There is no gap in our conversation that shows a deleted comment. And here is the history for the only comment in this thread that I edited.

Have you ever once considered the possibility that you are wrong? Wrong, and resorting to name calling out of anger?

1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

"I'm not making things up weirdo. You're defending pedophiles."

Feel free to quote a single instance of me doing so.

12
Questionable 12 points ago +12 / -0

You are reading details on a person who defines herself in quite unique ways... And yet somehow then chooses to then stereotype people based on the color of their skin, calling for their Euthanization. Even though she herself shares this pigmentation.

Sorry. I meant to say, You are looking at the highlighted profile of a wack job. Bitch is nuts.

2
Questionable 2 points ago +2 / -0

I would say you are mixing up psychosis with liberalism. But these days, there really isn't much difference.

1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yahh! We can't allow people to change sides! Or else we won't have an 'us vs them' dynamic! We need to remain in conflict forever! Because people can't change! /s

Now stare off into oblivion and repeat this mantra as your eyes glaze over:

"All of this has happened before, and it will all happen again..."

Don't think! drool!

1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

You again react with your heart and not your head. Making up stories in your mind.

May I remind you again. The person I was trying to talk to never came back.

He never acknowledged how that he derailed a thread on Pence's actionable crimes, or of how his reply was not related to to parent comment at all.

You continue to derail that thread further. Not caring at all about the actual topic.

Just as he had.

Outlandish accusations, baseless statements. Implications of mind games, and even fictional back stories, and narratives for motivations.

Again, you care only of winning. Even if that victory takes place exclusively in your head, and is based in fiction, and lies.

Personaje no jugador.

Es hora de despertar a LibreTrumplan.

2
Questionable 2 points ago +2 / -0

I am asking a really simple question. How did the people in this thread, go from judging something on the bases of merit, to reacting emotionally.

How did we get from here:

"Get where you're coming from, unless the accusations against him for child rape and plotting to assassinate Trump are true."

To here:

"Exactly! Pedos have really no good purpose in life and should die a painful death."

This is not a continuation of the conversation. It is not even addressing it in any way. His reply makes no sense in context. It derails the conversation, and he never replied to me. Don't you find that odd? Don't you ever Question anything?

Take this for example:

"What the fuck is wrong with you"

That's not a Question I can answer, it's not even a proper sentence. Do you not find it troubling that you communicate in sound bites? What kind of response did you expect from such an open ended Question?

This is the actual conversation thread, and it has been supplanted by emotional reactions.

2
Questionable 2 points ago +2 / -0

Murderous urges, are not a crime, murder is. Only murderers should be punished. Thoughts of violence is a psychiatric disorder, which implies one is a crime, and the other is a thought crime. Then you have the nerve to try and gaslight me, a guy who is now calling you out on that action. That is not acceptable behavior, at all.

Go find the definition of the word you are using. Keep looking until you find one that fits the definition you assume it means. You won't be back. Because it doesn't exist.

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/pedophilia

We don't prosecute or execute people for thoughtcrimes. Only actual criminal actions.

Which again, was not the point. The point being further down the comment thread, one which you are INTENTIONALLY ignoring, to try and gain leverage on a parent comment. Because you don't care about the truth, you only care about winning. Does that sound like someone you wish to be?

1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

Now that my mind has been set at ease on the topic of predictive programing, I am left with many Questions. What they have done to those children seems intentional, possibly with treasonous intent. How corrupted has Germany become?

2
Questionable 2 points ago +2 / -0

"You're the one worrying about semantics/misused words. You're the one that brought up"

Correct. As these are the tools used to corrupt and destroy nations.

0
Questionable 0 points ago +1 / -1

"Why are you defending pedophiles?"

I'm not. I Questioned the intentions of a statement, and it's incorrect use of grammar and words. I am a person that believes in Law & Order.

Now allow me to Quote myself, so that you may better assess my statements at this time:

"Rather odd jump in logic you just made from Questions of criminal intentions, to torturing people to death. Especially considering the person you are replying to named crimes, where as you are calling for torture and death based on psychiatric disorders."

Again the topic was Pence, and evidence of his criminal intentions. Yet you, as many others have, have allowed your feelings to take control, and guide you towards a path of torturing people to death based on misused words.

Coercion under the penalty of torture and death, over crimes of the mind, are the tools of totalitarianism and communist regimes.

Rape, molestation, child endangerment, child trafficking. These are actionable crimes.

This is the greatawakening not thedonald. This is not a place for "helicopter goes brrrr" This is a place of "Law & Order".

6
Questionable 6 points ago +6 / -0

True. But, they didn't expect Trump to be elected. So this has more to do with the great reset, and less to do with Trump himself.

Speaking of which, the last age we entered was referred to as a great reset. Just as it is now, when we are transitioning from Pisces, to Aquarius.

2
Questionable 2 points ago +2 / -0

I mostly understood what you were trying to say. The theorist in me though, wishes to know if you are using an autocomplete tech that helps you to complete your sentences. such as featured on many phones.

3
Questionable 3 points ago +4 / -1

No, I really didn't. That's something you are actively making up in your own head to justify your own incorrect statements. Which by the way, is the definition of "Mental Gymnastics"

Do you really not know the difference between criminal actions and disorders of the mind?

Next time you are to quote me. I expect you to quote me verbatim, and not just make up stories in your own mind.

1
Questionable 1 point ago +2 / -1

That's not what I said, and you know it. +2 Instant up votes on a handshake account.

4
Questionable 4 points ago +4 / -0

"Every psycho with even fleeting knowledge of this horrific crime against children should never again see the light of day."

So we are prosecuting the possession of knowledge, and not the criminal actions of people involved?

I am highly concerned with the thought process that formed that sentence.

-5
deleted -5 points ago +2 / -7
3
Questionable 3 points ago +3 / -0

What we know as the earth could be a small portion of a super earth, much larger than we realize.

1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes. But I think I know who Woody Allen was referring to, and it wasn't himself.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›