Starship has made all of it's 11 flights since the last time SLS has flown.
do you really need to know the answer? I think we all know which 200IQ genius did this
yup won't be reading any posts today
It's already been litigated - you cannot TM a surname. See the case about Dale Earnhardt (his widow attempted to sue her stepson Kerry for naming his company "The Earnhardt Collection")
owww,my neck
Very cool!!
POTUS is using his trolling/shitpoasting account to troll and shitpoast the haters...kek
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Field_marshal
I do not believe POTUS has to advertise that anyone has been promoted to this rank, it can be done and not known to anyone outside the ranks. Maybe someone here who knows more can confirm this.
AJ has referred to him multiple times as "Field Marshal Elon"
did u watch it? or gonna pretend like it doesn't exist
Here's a couple more links,
Danny Jones x Bart Sibrel https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=58YGzlW3Koc
Danny Jones x Everyday Astronaut https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R7gFk_By5wU
Like I said, does this prove or disprove? No. But I used to believe it was real, then I believed it was fake, now I KNOW it was at least plausible. Nobody knows, except the astronauts.
I'm not a genius, I'm actually pretty dumb. But lucky for me other smart people have already figured this out. https://youtu.be/fMHLvoWZfqQ (Chapter 2)
Here's another thing - I never believed that vaxxes caused SIDS, I thought that was crazy talk. I 100% do now, and for the last several years, even seeing evidence of it in my own friends' families.
Watch this. https://youtu.be/fMHLvoWZfqQ (Go to chapter 2)
Timestamp 10:00 for the exact section that addresses the "confetti explosion"
When I was a kid I believed the moon missions were real. Then I saw Bart Sibrel, and for years and years, I believed the moon missions were faked. I BELIEVED it was fake. And then in the last few years I found out that Bart is a complete idiot, almost everything he says is demonstrably false, and the things he points out are actually easy to understand and prove. Does it mean we really went to the moon? Of course not, only the astronauts know that (of which, I think we're down to the last two or three of them, not sure.) So yea, I changed my mind on this very topic, TWICE. Not trying to fight about this, either. Just making conversation. This topic is banned btw, so we're probably getting a vacation soon.
Watch this video with an open mind, and see what you think. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fMHLvoWZfqQ
I agree with what you're saying, we should have kept going back. But we didn't. We have other political agendas of the 1970s to blame for that, Vietnam war, space shuttle program/LEO, etc. Belee dat, if I was president at the time, we would have never stopped the moon missions
https://youtu.be/fMHLvoWZfqQ (chapter 2, timestamp 10:00, explained in full) the video link even ends with qQ
Building that stuff would be like trying to build a 1967 Camaro today. All the suppliers and tools are long gone, and we just don't (sadly) build stuff the same way anymore. We have new players, new tools, new techniques, new materials, new designs
but i assure you they will never land on the moon
I guess we'll know within the next couple years, right?
and the reason that you’ve never seen this video before, is because it’s so horrible that it actually causes people to question the rest of moon landing 🤔
I have seen this video since I was a kid, it's been out there since it was published like 50 years ago
confetti comes out of the rocket 😂
This is aKtually a well known, well understood phenomenon in photography - what you're seeing is chromatic aberration which is worsened by converting an SSTV signal to NTSC. This is photography 101 stuff.
Edit: I was sortof wrong with my initial response. While true it is a type of chromatic abberation, it was not due to the lens used, but due to the fact that they used a color wheel to simulate color broadcast in SSTV within the bandwidth of a B/W TV signal. Check out the video, they explain it much better than I can https://youtu.be/fMHLvoWZfqQ (10:00 timestamp)
and its of the lunar lander “launching” off of the moon…
If it's fake, why did they take 6 missions to get this shot right? If it's CGI, why not just nail the shot on the first mission?
yes but I also think that one of NASA's missions is to do the things that are exploratory and not profitable (yet), the types of things that only nations can do, yet SpaceX is changing all that.
we've had interplanetary nuclear powered spacecraft for decades - he must mean either nuclear fission powered, or fusion engine, rather than RTG
Looks more like ukraine flag to me