I live in a college town in CA. It is has a pretty high percentage of "Democracy is Life" AKA "Lib" (where both of those words mean pretty much the opposite of their original meaning).
So here I was, riding around town (I bike several times a week so that was not uncommon) and I was struck with how many people had political posts on their lawn. Indeed, it seemed that about 30%+ of the houses (in the area of town I was riding in) had political signs. As a college town (a "hippy town," only most of the hippies are dead, so pseudo-hippies) it is not uncommon to show your political preferences on your lawn. But in this case, I'd guess it was around two to three times as many people posting signs as was usual.
But here's the thing:
There was not a SINGLE PERSON giving a shit about the Governors Primary. Not one single sign, nor anything else on the state or federal level. Instead, every single sign was about a local measure. This particular measure has been pushed for the past few months by a well paid for (propaganda) "Yes" vote on the measure. Every week we get a new mailer showing how great that measure is, and I never saw a single mailer against it. Despite that, it seemed to me that about 60-65% of the political lawn signs I saw were "No."
For the past couple months it has been pretty clear to me that the measure was a corporate power land grab. It has all the hallmarks of another push towards their "perfect 15 minute city". As a CA college town this place has a lot of money, and they have been pushing that agenda for quite a while now. Despite that, and despite all of the money coming in to push the agenda, the agenda seems to have been failing (according to my informal polling during my ride). I guess I'll find out tomorrow what the final vote was (or maybe in 2 weeks from now when the "dead vote" comes in...).
Now, I'm not gonna lie: from my perspective their "utopian city" is not a bad thing. As I said, I ride a lot. So more riding infrastructure is nice. Lots of parks is nice. Low crime is nice. Lots of money is nice. But the cost of living is insane (gas, food, power, water, etc.) and housing is INSANE (I'm not going to say how insane it is, because it's grotesque). The taxes are over the top (like the measure being voted on). And the taxes ONLY GO UP. They are never "paid off." If we hadn't grandfathered ourselves into an apartment (been there for 12 years now), we couldn't possibly afford to live there (well, we could, but we would be in the "poor" category, even though we should be in the "reasonably well off" category). The only way the people of the city can survive is by either paying WAY too much for rent (a fair bit of it paid for by foreign (Chinese) students), quite a bit from other student's loans (that they will never be able to pay off and/or will be paid off by very rich parents), people who bought their house 20-30+ years ago, people like me who are renting (and have been for way too long), or by Blackrock (et al) (which is more and more of the town all the time).
The point is this:
Here, in this local political environment, where engagement is always high, people care both more, in general, and specifically about their town (related to the obvious corporate land grabs and taxes), than they care about the Governor of CA (which is a hop skip and a jump away from Pres.).
I've never seen anything like it.
Despite the plethora of similar titles, this isn't a post promoting silver, or the price of silver, or the fuckery in the silver market, etc. This is a post about getting delivery of your silver if you buy it.
On Jan 17th I bought some silver from JMBullion.com. Whenever I buy PM, I am always afraid that at some point it will become impossible to actually get delivery of the purchase: that the dealers, who are all ultimately controlled by the Monopoly, will "take the money and run." Or in the best case, the money will be refunded.
As of today, on Jan 29th 2026, after two full weeks without nary a word, and despite the fact that the silver has gained 30%+ between buying the purchase and sending it, they finally sent my silver purchase. I haven't actually received it yet, but Fedex reports having it, and that strongly suggests I will probably get it soon.
So for any of you who worry "it's too late," it's not too late. You can trust your purchase.
Until you can't.
Additional Evidence
This deep dive on the Amazon book from Sep. 9 from GAW regarding the Charlie Kirk assassination gives plausible reasoning suggesting that the book may not have been posted early. However, that was only one piece of evidence for "Media Precognition". There was an X post about a TikTok post that gave information about a Google search showing media headlines prior to the event. I had found the original X post at some time before the link I am going to show you, but for the life of me I can't find it now. I was able to find a partial of that post however, linked from another GAW post, which linked to an Infowars Youtube video that contained a partial of the original X post (though not the original TikTok post). You can find the relevant part on Infowars starting at 9:04.
She (the TikTok poster) says (and partially shows) that her Google search provided links to both the Los Angeles Times and the New York Times. The Google search gives headlines about the assassination of Kirk, and the time stamp of the crawler, according to Google, was "19 hours before" her search. This 19 hours was at 5:01 PM, Sep. 10th according to the X post, but the time zone is unknown. However, she said “I'm devastated, I'm stressed, I hope he's OK,” and later she said "this just happened" so it was clearly prior to any reasonable window. That suggests that the Google crawler had found those pages for the news sites, and they had created those headlines before (at the latest) 1:00AM Sep 10th. (Here's a little bit of info) about how time stamps work for Google's crawler.)
As corroborating evidence, u/polish_snausage had linked this picture showing an X post showing a New York Times posting about the assassination 8 hours prior to some persons feed. The time of that posting (again, time zone unknown, but both times in the same time zone) was 4:53PM. While there is no way to be sure what time that is, all of the other news sites in their feed was from 4 hours prior or earlier.
Media Precognition And Psyops
There is precedence for psyop creators giving information to the media concerning major events prior to the event actually happening. I'm not sure why, but perhaps it is done to make sure the information of the narrative is correct, even if the timing is not. Any timing errors will be fixed in post (using the memory hole, or "plausible reasoning").
The most famous Media Precognition that I'm aware of is the report (from the BBC?) concerning the “collapse” (demolition) of Building 7 15-20 minutes (iirc) prior to it actually falling down. Indeed, the media had the “I'm not dead yet” building IN THE PICTURE FULLY STANDING, with a time stamp, showing as plain as day that they were some how reporting the future. I don't have a link to that off the top of my head, but it's in my notes somewhere. If it's really important I can find it, though I imagine most here have already seen it and linked it themselves many times.
As I said, I had seen the X post in its entirety, but I can't find it now. I think it is interesting that the Infowars video had truncated it. She had something in her TikTok post about archiving some links, but I can't find that info. (I may be misremembering this information. I looked at a lot of different things at that time.)
I do not know how to use X or TikTok. I don't know if those posts can be found with the available information from the Infowars video. The X post had something about Wall Street Apes, but I am completely inept when it comes to these things. Any help to find that original post (and maybe what those news site or google search result irls actually were) would be helpful.
I think there is more to the story than the Amazon book. Indeed, at the time, I didn't think that book was all that interesting when I was looking into it on the 10th. The crawler searches are far more compelling evidence.
I have heard it said recently that "MAGA is imploding."
Perhaps those of us who understand Q realize that is not the case. However, I want to look at the idea.
MAGA is about We The People, period. That was the purpose of Q. It was never about Trump. This alignment against the Epstein "debacle" proves it. Indeed, if MAGA is aligning against Trump (even if only a little bit), it proves it lives beyond Trump and is even more united than ever. It reminds the People that We have the power.
But this unification has much further effects than just MAGA.
Some believe the protection of Agency is what matters most.
Some believe the declassification [public exposure of truth] and rebuilding of
Agency is what matters most.
Apply same to FBI.
Apply same to State.
Q is saying that these things are NOT what is important. Indeed, they are saying that the SYSTEM ITSELF is not what is important.
Any attempt to buck the system, no matter severity of crime, and they will fight back [self-preservation].
The system will fight back. What is the system in this context? It's the US Government. Who currently runs the US Government? With regards to the current focal point, it's Trump, Patel, Bondi, Bongino.
From the Systems perspective, it must be preserved. From the We The People's perspective, we now realize that that System has been self-preserving itself no matter the cost to We The People.
SHADOW GAME.
What is a shadow game? It is obfuscation of purpose, misdirection.
The system must preserve itself. But what if what you want is to not preserve the System. What if it is too corrupted, even at it's very core. How can you destroy it while also seeming to be working towards preserving it?
Kayfabe. Obfuscation. Shadow game.
Act in one direction, with the actual intention of the opposite.
What if what you want to do is
Prevent public exposure of truth.
Why?
Is "preventing public of exposure of truth" exactly what Trump is doing?
Why would he do that?
What if working towards an action is actually intended to accomplish the opposite?
PEOPLE [UNITED] HAVE THE POWER.
How do you unite the people against a System so powerful, a System whose entire design is to divide the people through control of belief?
You have to use the very System that is designed to divide the people against itself. You have to create counter beliefs.
That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, -That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government,
The system must be abolished. That doesn't mean "fixed." It means abolished, destroyed.
Now, I don't know exactly what that means. I'm not suggesting we need to throw out the baby with the bathwater. But I can prove, beyond question, that the very Constitution itself is fatally flawed. There are a lot of good things in there, especially within the rhetoric. There are a couple required omissions and a few evil laws from the inception, but those statements are beyond the scope of this argument, and it's certainly not all bad.
The point is, whatever it is that we need to do, we can only do it if we are truly United (not counting 4-6%). We must be United to up to ~95% of the population. We are a currently a fair bit away from there. The only way to do that is to find a focal point, a shared belief that will unite us.
Political leader(s) [+family (follow)] w: possible ties to sex trafficking?
A huge portion of the planet thinks that Epstein was tied to Elite sex trafficking. But they don't know how big it really is. Their normalcy bias pushes them to think it's just a few isolated incidents. It's "not that bad," and it's definitely not "the whole system," or "their party."
Attacks [barrage] by media signify what?
Attacks by media are designed to push wide spread belief, specifically division. Trump has been attacked because he is against the establishment.
But now they must attack his ties to sex trafficking (many ties, true or not).
And those ties are deep with Epstein. Even if he himself isn't a criminal, the ties are very deep. There is a lot of fodder to create reasonable doubts. That makes it more than "plausible" that Trump is himself a subject of the Epstein blackmail system.
And Trump is feeding that belief full bore.
Why? Well, what is the actual effect of his actions? He looks guilty as fuck. What can the media do? They need to stop talking about Epstein. They need to mute that line of reasoning because of where it goes.
The media is fucked.
In addition, all (ALL) of the Dem pundits, both controlled opposition and true believers are pushing that presumed guilt just as far as the MAGA pundits are, or even more.
'Sex trafficking' [safeguarding women & children] topic(s) that UNITE all political factions against a common enemy [faith in Humanity]?
Everyone is UNITED. More than I've ever seen in my life.
Those you are taught to trust the most.
I used to think those "trusted people" were the other politicians that were shown to be tied to the Cabal, no matter their ideals. I suggest it has multiple meanings. Who do you trust the most? For MAGA it's Trump.
This questioning against Trump teaches MAGA to unite with the Dems, even if they don't necessarily realize it yet.
Sex trafficking' [safeguarding women & children] topic(s) that UNITE all political factions against a common enemy [faith in Humanity]?
"Topics that unite all political factions against a common enemy..."
At the moment that common enemy is Trump vis a vis Epstein.
Kayfabe.
How do you unite EVERYONE?
It had to be this way.
Sometimes you must walk through the darkness before you see the light.
The crux of the issue is, according to Roberts, that Judges are above the will of The People. He points out, by his own admission, though perhaps not by his intention, a fundamental flaw in our judicial system.
This is what Trump said that elicited the response by Roberts:
This Radical Left Lunatic of a Judge, a troublemaker and agitator who was sadly appointed by Barack Hussein Obama, was not elected President - He didn’t WIN the popular VOTE (by a lot!), he didn’t WIN ALL SEVEN SWING STATES, he didn’t WIN 2,750 to 525 Counties, HE DIDN’T WIN ANYTHING! I WON FOR MANY REASONS, IN AN OVERWHELMING MANDATE, BUT FIGHTING ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION MAY HAVE BEEN THE NUMBER ONE REASON FOR THIS HISTORIC VICTORY. I’m just doing what the VOTERS wanted me to do. This judge, like many of the Crooked Judges’ I am forced to appear before, should be IMPEACHED!!! WE DON’T WANT VICIOUS, VIOLENT, AND DEMENTED CRIMINALS, MANY OF THEM DERANGED MURDERERS, IN OUR COUNTRY. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!!!
Emphasis mine.
Trump is saying here, or at least implying, that We The People have no recourse when a judge is evil. Note I am talking about the Judge, not their decision. We can't impeach a judge. We can't do anything against a judge. They are the law (literally) and are, at least in our current system, above the will of the people.
Roberts agrees:
The court has obviously made mistakes throughout its history, and those should be criticized, so long as it is in terms of the decision, really, and not ad hominem against the justices
You can agree with a Judge's decision, but only through a ludicrous and expensive process chock full of cronyism and self-protection. You can criticize only the decision itself, never the person (equal human being) we call "Judge," no matter how bad of a person they are, or how powerful their decisions are.
This systemic flaw has always been that way, from the very beginning of our historical record. In the Code of Hammurabi, for example, they had laws for almost everyone, even the King. The only people who were (legally) above reproach were the Priests, the very same people who wrote the laws. Of course at the time, the Priests were the Judges. This system of laws created (by intention) this class of people at the top of the hierarchy. Importantly, the King was said to be the most important person in their society, but in reality it was the Priests, controlling behind the scenes.
The more I look into things the more that nothing has changed since that Mesopotamian culture (in more ways than one).
For more than two centuries, it has been established that impeachment is not an appropriate response to disagreement concerning a judicial decision. The normal appellate review process exists for that purpose,
"The normal appellate review process" (a system of cronyism) is the ONLY "appropriate response to [a judges] disagreement". WE HAVE NO CAPACITY TO GET RID OF THEM, NO MATTER HOW EVIL THEY MAY BE.
To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize.
Who are you not allowed to criticize? Judges.
Who rules over you? Judges.
Who wrote the law? Judges.
What can we do about it?
Nothing.
At least nothing Constitutional.
This was a response I made regarding LBJ and the JFK files, and "how the world really works." There may be those who believe that LBJ was the person who put the hit on JFK. OK, maybe, but who told him to?
I felt my response was worthy of presentation to a larger audience. A great deal more is elaborated in my report. I hope to put out more evidence and elaboration in the future. Here, I will attempt to be brief. This is as minimal as I can figure out to say it where it will make any sense.
The Social World is Constructed as a Pyramid.
-
At the base of the pyramid is the useless eaters (the populace). Almost all of them are completely oblivious. They live in The Matrix and they are happy to be there, living purely as an energy source for the Machine.
-
Above them is the first layer of management. These are agents of the Cabal, but most of them have no idea that they are agents of the Cabal. They believe "the Cabal" is just a "conspiracy theory," just like everyone else. All of these people have been compromised; they are aware they are corrupted and are controlled by "someone up the food chain", but for the most part their belief is that the Food Chain doesn't extend very far (up to a mafia don, e.g., or corrupt local politician, etc.). These are the people who have some level of awareness of "how the world really works," but they get it all wrong, intentionally. These people are the corrupted people who have some level of influence or control. This level are the corrupt cops, low level CIA/FBI agents or their assets (newsmen, writers, some actors, youtube influencers, etc.), lawyers, some judges, lieutenants in the mafia, VPs in big corporations, etc..
-
Above them is the second layer of management. These people have more influence and more control, but they are still visible; the Front Men (front people). They have more knowledge, to an extent, that there is a bigger Food Chain and who the real people are who are running the show. They aren't just compromised, they are made. They get to the positions they have because they are owned, promoted to become the people who sit at what the populace believes is the "top of society." These are people like big corporate CEOs, A-list actors, the world's most popular newsmen, high level judges, police chiefs of big cities, high level CIA/FBI agents (the corrupted ones), Senators, Vice Presidents, Presidents. These people become who they are because the next level up the chain has promoted them.
-
Above these Front Men are the Board of Directors. These are actual boards of directors (BOD), aka people who sit on BODs of major corporations, NGOs, mafia, etc. Basically the Cabal. They are in the positions they are in because they were both born into it, and they are corrupted. They are groomed from birth. Not everyone who is born to this top level of society is corrupted, but those who make it to a BOD become who they are because they are both born into it (a genetic legacy, aka an aristocracy) and by skill (meritocracy), and because they are corrupted, compromised, black mailed.
-
Within the "top of the pyramid" is another pyramid, an internal structure. For example, the Council of Foreign Relations has such an internal structure. There is the low level CFR members, people who have some level of what is going on but who have no real decision making power, and the top level CFR members who are promoted within that internal group. These top level are the people who “advise” the Senators and Congressmen to make the Country’s foreign policy decisions. This top level of CFR are also the exact same people who sit on the Bilderbergs, Trilateral Commission, and other such organizations. Similarly there are the corporate BODs. No one who is at the highest level sits on just one organization. They sit on them all. The more BODs you sit on, the more higher up the food chain you sit. Look at how many BODs some people sit on (a lot of that information is hidden). After the Teapot Dome scandal, a Senate investigation into Frank Vanderlip for example (an agent of JD Rockefeller), was found to be on 40+ BODs, not to mention a founding member of the CFR. It requires a great deal more elaboration to understand this internal structure, and it's not as cut and dry as I've said (JD Rockefeller sat higher than Vanderflip e.g., even though he was on fewer BODs), but this an example.
The Cabal Is Constructed as a Terrorist Organization
The Cabal is composed of Cells. At each layer there is minimal information and understanding of the real organization, people, agendas. In the lower and middle layers, most don’t even know the Cabal exists; only that they are compromised (someone controls their actions to some extent). Only the top layer knows what is really going on; they are the ones who do the actual decision making. The people just below the top layer know they are controlled, compromised, black mailed. Indeed, they make it that high because of that compromise. LBJ was one such person. So was Allen Dulles. They were both provably made men (agents of family Rockefeller).
A thought recently occurred to me related to the upcoming election: What if all the ducks somehow get aligned and the real vote is counted? What if that count were not, as it proposes, around "50:50," but rather closer to 80:20?
That may sound ridiculous, but frankly I think that would be a trivial thing to accomplish given the information control machinery that exists. Through propaganda, false polls, control of the narrative, active psyops, and all the shit we know exists, I don't think it would actually take that much effort for the C_A et al to construct this specific Illusion.
I have no doubt that many have had similar thoughts, but what if that event actually occurred? The power of such a Black Swan event would be absolutely epic, across not just the US, but the entire planet. Everything would change completely. At least some version of the Great Awakening would be instantaneous.
Would it be violent? I don't think so. In this supposition it would already be 80/20. That makes it a lot easier to swallow that pill given the demographic influences. Would it be too damaging for the 20%? We have some pretty good indications we'll lose about 5% to broken brains. That represents 25% of the residual (25% of 20% is 5%). 5% is no small number of people, but it is aligned with the projected particular cost of the war. I think the resulting mental displacement is a plausible cause for that level of destruction.
I don't know. Just some ideas I had when a swan bit me in the shower.
P.S. Addendum: I think it may be even more likely that a few key battleground states will get a real vote, and the numbers will be so far off (80/20 e.g.) that it wakes up a huge swath of new sleepers (Big Black Swan bites hard). It wouldn't be as potent of a wake up call as a 50 state bonanza, but logistically it would be a lot easier and there are already some potent moves happening in that direction (Georgie, NC, etc.).
An interesting topic of conversation came up over Thanksgiving. My sister is pretty savvy on what's going down. She's aware of the Cabal. She's hip on Q (or at least mostly aware of the Q story). I don't think she is fully aware of everything, but far more than most.
But she also is not a fan of Trump. She recognizes that most of what is said about him is a lie, but she just doesn't like him. She thinks he's a blowhard and overly divisive. I agree with her, but I've explained to her (albeit briefly) why I think both of those qualities are intentional. However, she doesn't care. She does however love RFK, Jr. She said she would vote for him in a heartbeat no matter what party flag he waves.
I thought about it, and I think RFK, Jr. could very likely be a unifying force, not to mention that there is both a sense of justice and closure to the effort of Q if he became President.
What do you think? What if RFK is the democrat nominee, or even an independent. Would you vote for him over Trump? Even if not, even if you think such a statement is sacrilegious, do you think he would be good for the country? Do you think he would be a unifying force? Do you think him as President would bring honest debate to the table on the "hot topics?" Do you think he would be able to put an end to the propaganda driven division (not by himself of course, but rather, as part of the Q plan)?
Of course, I don't know what The Plan is, and I don't think anything can change the course, but there are layers upon layers to The Plan, and there is nothing better than a surprise ending, especially one that feels like Justice. Who knows. Maybe RFK, Jr. IS The Plan.
What do you think of him as President for 2024?
I hate to date fag (I don’t actually hate it, I’m just not very good at it), but after the events of last night, and especially after Trump's return to Twitter, I started looking at some Q posts. On Nov 2, 2017 Q posted the famous post we are all anticipating:
On the same day, Q posted this:
55-44 = 11
Tonight is Friday. Last night (Aug 24) , arguably the "first arrest" and Trumps first tweet in ages is on a direct line on the Q clock from Nov 2 on the 5 o’clock line (the [:25][:55] line), 11 spaces down.
5 x 11 = 5:5?
Tomorrow is the 5 year delta for this:
On the [:28] line is 10/31. On Oct 31, 2017 is Q post 16:
Big night tonight?
Big week ahead?
The month of AUGUST is traditionally very HOT.
We’ve got heat waves, Maui fires, threats of a second Covid lockdown, the first arrest of a President ever... how hot will August get?
I know it’s not much, but my implied prediction of “The Tweet” being tonight will prove itself right or wrong in a matter of hours, so I thought I’d throw it out there, just in case.
This post contains so many clues to the history of 20th century. This must have been analyzed a great deal when it first came out and since then, but finding those digs is proving problematic. I am requesting information on any digs into the clues laid out in q post 142.
Specifically, I want to know who family 'y' is (House of Windsor?). I want to know how Soros connects to it. What is his history with regard to WWII? How do Hitler and Merkel connect?
I know there are is a lot of speculation about some of these things (Merkel daughter of Hitler, Hitler grandchild of Rothschild, etc.), but I want to see the actual digs (evidence). If anyone knows where the investigations might be, please point me in that direction.
Thanks in advance.
For whatever reason this video was recommended to me on Youtube. I've never seen this guy before, and for my tastes, he's a little too exuberant in his bias, but his sourcing is impeccable, and he gives details on those sources within his narrative.
According to his evidence, Abraham Lincoln, and the entire American Civil War had nothing to do with freeing black people, and everything to do with creating a totalitarian Federal Government (AKA Globalism).
People think the Greenback is proof of Lincolns "side" ("against" the bankers). I have not found that to be corroborated in my investigation. In fact, I think that pushed us more in debt to the Rothschilds, though I have yet to nail down a direct connection between that act and the Rothschilds, so it's more of a supposition at this point.
Regardless, my investigation into Lincoln outside of the Greenback produced a very different story than official history suggests. This is especially true within the scope of the Civil War, which put us forever in debt (we are STILL in debt from the Civil War to the European Central Bank (AKA Rothschild)), and put us all (every single citizen of the United States of America) in perpetual debt slavery, from which we can never legally escape.
I think Lincoln was an agent of the Cabal, pushing us towards a One World Government. This video exposes a great deal of evidence that supports that assertion, and imo, is a must see for the citations alone.
If you find the narrator off-putting, please try to get past his obvious bias. There is really a lot of good evidence in there.
I am reposting a response I made in another thread and expanding it. People don't appreciate what it would mean to "go to a gold standard" per H.R.2435. The idea is that it doesn't matter how much money there is, they can set the ratio of gold to dollar at whatever they want. "However much there is in present day dollars. It doesn't matter."
That's the first problem, so let's look at that:
How Much Is Gold Worth
According to the official narrative, there are about 8,133 metric tons of gold in U.S. reserves. I doubt that is true, I think it has been mostly moved into private bankers hands, but we'll go with it. There are 32,150 troy oz. per metric ton. That means there are, in reserve:
8133 metric tons times 32150 troy oz/metric ton ~ 261 million troy oz.
As for the total money that exists, the official number (not that I trust it, but we'll go with it) is between 40 trillion (narrow money), 90 trillion (broad money) or 1.3 quadrillion (derivatives, investments, etc.). With the amount of naked short selling, I wouldn't be surprised if you could double or triple that, so upwards of 4 quadrillion.
Putting this into perspective, we get one U.S. gold backed dollar is equal to:
- narrow money: 6.5e-6 oz
- broad money: 2.91e-6 oz
- derivatives: 2.01e-7 oz
- short sales: 6.5e-8 oz
These numbers don't mean much, so let me try to put it into something that makes a little more sense. Here is a picture of 1g of gold. It's not the best picture since it doesn't show the whole hand, but it shows that it isn't very much. Carrying that around, it would be pretty darn easy to lose it. But let me give you an idea of what one U.S. gold backed dollar would look like:
- narrow money: 1/5000 of a gram
- broad money: 1/11,000 of a gram
- derivatives: 1/160,000 of a gram
- short sales: 1/500,000 of a gram
Even with narrow money, think about dividing that gram picture into 5000 parts, then try to find it in your pocket. With short sales, divide it into half a million parts. It's almost easier to start measuring dollars in atoms of gold.
That 1g sells for about $130. This suggests it should be worth between $5000 and $500,000 if we were to move to a "gold standard" as things stand today.
For reference, that translates to between $150,000 and $15,000,000 per troy oz in today's money.
Now on to the next problem. The dollars that exist aren't money, they are debt. If we go to a "gold standard" there will still be all the debt, and the interest on that debt, that belongs to Megabank. If we move to a "gold standard," all that debt either needs to be paid off, or needs to be wiped out. But where does all the money reside?
Where's The Money
If we just look at narrow money (bank accounts, bank notes, etc.) that's the stuff that people have "on hand" (not really, because it's mostly in the fractional reserve shenanigans, but close enough). But who has the most money in bank accounts? According to this, the median bank account in America (in 2019) was about $5000, and the average was $42,000. That is a HUGE discrepancy, which means that the people with all the money have far more than the average person. The people with all the money are, in general, the Aristocracy AKA the Cabal. If we use the median this amounts to about $1.7 trillion (5000 times 330M people in America). Most of the rest of that $40T of narrow money lies in the hands of the very rich.
However, if we look at derivatives (not to mention naked short selling money) ALL of that money is in the hands of Megacorp.
So no matter how you divide it, as things stand today, the gold goes into the hands of the same people that rule the world right now.
Paying Off The Debt
If we don't wipe out all debt, then all those debts need to be paid off. But money is debt. Money comes to be when a debt is created. That's what "printing" money means. A loan is taken out, in one column a credit is given. This is money. In the other column a debt is created.
Money = Debt
BUT, that's not what really happens. A debt is paid back at interest.
Money + Interest = Debt
So all the DEBT in the world is equal to all the money PLUS all of the interest it has accrued, i.e. there is more debt than there is money. The debt can't be paid off. So all of that gold will eventually end up in the hands of the PTB, PLUS we will remain debt slaves forever.
With the current financial system, no matter how you slice it, all the power remains exactly where it is if we move into a "gold standard."
The system must fail. There is no other choice.
I've been having an idea for a while. I hate to prognosticate (because I'm really bad at it), but this is a hypothesis that will be proven true or false in very short order. Because there isn't too much time left for me to look like an idiot with bad predictions, I will put it out there now.
Everyone thinks there will be a "Red Wave" in the next couple weeks. I've been thinking it can't be. I think it might go Red majority in the house and senate (or maybe just one of them), but I don't think it's going to be overwhelming. I think it's going to be very close no matter what happens.
Let me elaborate.
If we get an overwhelming Red Wave it won't expose the election fraud. People need to see the fuckery without the incredibly polarizing person that is Trump. Also, if there is an overwhelming Red Wave, all actions taken by that super Red legislature will not wake people up, but rather will be seen as partisan and deepen the division.
I think a Purple Wave will happen for the same reason that Biden had to win. This isn't over yet.
I think that:
"This is not simply another four-year election. This is a crossroads in the history of our civilization that will determine whether or not we, the people, reclaim control over our government."
meant Biden's tenure, just as much as it meant Trump's.
Think multiple meanings.
Look at all the huge victories we've had since Biden "took over" that are seen as under the Blue flag. For example, imagine if the Roe v. Wade reversal happened under Trump. In a non-Patriot controlled Show, the world would probably be at full out WWIII right now and the R v. W decision would have gone right back after Biden, or perhaps more likely, made into Federal law.
We have a long ways to go yet I think. If it is truly a Red Wave, things won't play out in the "Wake Up" way I think they need to.
Having said that, this isn't my Show, and I know exactly dick, so who knows.
We shall see soon enough.
Buckle Up. I think it's going to be a very interesting couple of weeks. The wave may or may not be Red, but the sky is red as fuck. The Storm is coming.
It may be "upon us" very soon.
I have begun release of Part 2 of my report: Welcome To The Machine.
The first part of that release is found on Superstonk. If you could go upvote it just so it gets to more people I would really appreciate it.
However, the real post is on the website I made for it.
Part 1 is a revised version of a report I made last year that shows all companies are one company.
Part 2 is going to do that and more. It is a normie Red-Pill though, and designed to make it past Superstonk censors (I hope) so it takes a direct approach to the problem through the corporate world. I show how the world was created. I show how The Matrix was created.
What I have up so far (sections 4 and 5) does not do that quite yet. That is about the first 1/3 of my report. Hopefully section 6 will be done in a couple weeks. Each section increases the scope of the problem, allowing people to see the evidence without rejecting it due to cognitive dissonance. At least that is how it is supposed to work. We shall see.
If you are interested, it shows a whole lot that not many people know. It represents a few thousand hours of research over the past year and a half or so. I believe the details of the nature of our world are important, and it gets into the details.
If you are interested in Economics (almost all of life's decisions are economic), or the way the world we live in was constructed, what that means, and what the solution to the conundrum is, I humbly suggest my report will be covering that. What I have up so far doesn't quite get there yet, but it makes a proper start.
Thanks for reading.
Building off this post by u/JSSS I did a few minutes of digging into the possibility of the same crisis actor being killed twice. I looked into seeing if perhaps Eva Mirales, a teacher "killed" in Uvalde was the same person as Rachel D'Avino, a teacher "killed" in Sandy Hook.
Here is a pic of "Rachel D'Avino". I put that in quotes because Rachel might be Sarah. With more to that story here.
Compare that to this pic of Eva Mirales a decade later.
I think this pic is the same Eva Mirales as the one that was "killed" in Uvalde, but she appears quite a bit heavier. Here is her website that tells all about how great she is at teaching.
Here is a pic of Rachel D'Avino that is also very overweight (taken from the "Sarah" link above). Compare that to the Eva Mirales overweight pic above.
I think it is very possible that once again, Finkle is Einhorn.
The damned time line is completely fubar now.
In the report I am writing, I used the line "Drive by fruiting" from Ms. Doubtfire. I went to go find a clip of it so I could include it, but apparently it's now "Run by fruiting."
This time shift had better be worth it.
There isn't a lot of primary source and red-pill friendly documents on the money hospitals make from COVID that is subsidized by the Federal government through the CARES Act. This is intended to be an exposure to that for the purpose of showing to skeptics.
This article published on the Kaiser website states:
The three COVID-19 stimulus bills that Congress has passed provide additional funding for hospitals and for free coronavirus testing for the uninsured through Medicaid. While Congress did not allocate any money specifically for COVID-19 treatment or coverage for the uninsured, President Trump has stated his intention to reimburse hospitals for treating the uninsured by tapping a new $100 billion in funding for hospitals and other health care entities...
...administration officials have said that hospitals would get reimbursed at Medicare rates, which are substantially lower than prices paid by private insurers. The administration has not provided any cost estimates for this new policy, other than to say that the funding will come from the $100 billion in the CARES Act.
They estimate how much an uninsured person diagnosed with COVID will cost the taxpayer. The official Medicaid government site estimates the number of people on Medicaid (which is what covers these “uninsured”) is 71.4M in 2019. This Kaiser article also estimates how much the hospital will get for anyone on Medicare, which is exclusively for people over 65. This Medicare receiving population is a large percentage of the people admitted to the hospital for COVID, and a large percentage of the people put on ventilators. This site (stated to be on contract with cms.gov) estimates the number of people on Medicare is 64.4M in 2019.
The difference between Medicare and Medicaid is that Medicare is supposedly paid for by a Trust that people put in to, however, Medicare is highly subsidized by the Federal and State governments. In response to the “COVID crisis” these subsidies were increased by the CARES act. Medicaid on the other hand is paid effectively 100% by government subsidies.
In either case the CARES act puts all of those people in one COVID crisis bucket, and pays for all the COVID stuff. The total number of Americans (or illegal aliens in America) that are paid for by these government subsidies is around 136M + some number of illegal aliens.
This Kaiser article also says something else very interesting. The hospitals get more from everyone else; i.e. those with their own health insurance. It states:
Medicare payments are about half of what private insurers pay on average for the same diagnoses.
You might say, well that’s Health Insurance; the Health Insurance Companies bear that burden. But the money doesn’t come “from” the health insurers, it comes out of the paychecks of people who work. It is just another payroll tax, generally compulsory. The point being, the hospitals receive even more for everyone else than what is stated in this Kaiser article.
They go through some justifications for their final estimate before stating it:
To project how much hospitals would get paid by the federal government for treating uninsured patients, we look at payments for admissions for similar conditions. For less severe hospitalizations, we use the average Medicare payment for respiratory infections and inflammations with major comorbidities or complications in 2017, which was $13,297. For more severe hospitalizations, we use the average Medicare payment for a respiratory system diagnosis with ventilator support for greater than 96 hours, which was $40,218. Each of these average payments was then increased by 20% to account for the add-on to Medicare inpatient reimbursement for patients with COVID-19 that was included in the CARES Act.
That’s $13,297 (in 2017 dollars) on average for anyone admitted to a hospital for such a disease, and $40,218 (in 2017 dollars) on average for anyone put on a respirator. You then take that amount and multiply it by 20% (per the CARES Act), and then adjust for inflation (a whopping 13.7%) for totals of $18.1k and $54.9k. This doesn’t take into account the bonuses for Remdesivir, or the other incentives.
These bonuses can be found in this document from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). The details begin on page 53.
It should be noted that this bonus 20% is if someone is diagnosed with COVID. It should also be noted a person can be diagnosed with COVID even if they haven't tested for it, or even if they test for it and the test is negative, if the doctor determines that they likely have COVID.
From the CDC COVID diagnosis guidance (page 2, left side bottom):
In cases where a definite diagnosis of COVID–19 cannot be made, but it is suspected or likely (e.g., the circumstances are compelling within a reasonable degree of certainty), it is acceptable to report COVID–19 on a death certificate as “probable” or “presumed.” In these instances, certifiers should use their best clinical judgement in determining if a COVID–19 infection was likely
This article from the American College of Cardiology says this about false negatives for the RT-PCR test in May 2020 (one of the peaks of the COVID crisis):
Over the 4 days of infection before the typical time of symptom onset (day 5), the probability of a false-negative result in an infected person decreased from 100% (95% confidence interval [CI], 100%-100%) on day 1 to 67% (CI, 27%-94%) on day 4. On the day of symptom onset, the median false-negative rate was 38% (CI, 18%-65%). This decreased to 20% (CI, 12%-30%) on day 8 (3 days after symptom onset) then began to increase again, from 21% (CI, 13%-31%) on day 9 to 66% (CI, 54%-77%) on day 21. The false-negative rate was minimized 8 days after exposure—that is, 3 days after the onset of symptoms on average.
So at best (only on day 8 after infection) the false negative rate is 20%, coming down from 38% on day 4, and rising up to 66% on day 9 according to this article. I don't know if that's accurate. I did not do an analysis on their methods. But it is what they say, and if it is what they say, it is likely what doctors believe.
If doctors believe that there are a ton of false negatives, and there is a real scare in the community that an absolutely devastating virus is about to consume the world, might they err on the side of caution?
This doesn't even touch the financial incentives. This is just accidental, fear based misdiagnoses. Misdiagnoses happen all the time for other things. This article suggests a 9.7% average misdiagnoses across the board in Medicine. Now we have new tests, that are shown to err all the time (I haven't even touched false positives here). We have fears that missing a COVID diagnosis could result in other deaths because we are told that constantly by the media. We have massive financial incentives to diagnose COVID. I’m not saying that it is happening, but it is ridiculous to think its impossible given the absolute Billions involved. Corporations have done a lot worse than encourage a misdiagnosis for money. It would be completely unreasonable to assume that misdiagnoses aren't happening here.
Could that be why the flu has been cured? Might they not be misdiagnosing the flu for COVID just in case? How about pneumonia? That also looks like COVID no matter the cause. How about remdesivir treatments which can cause kidney disorders. Kidney disorders of this type can cause the lungs to fill with fluid because your body is unable to take the fluid out (the job of the kidneys). Both of these symptoms from remdesivir are also reported symptoms of COVID. Are there possible complications from this symptomatic crossover, including perhaps ventilation, which has a 50-90% mortality rate depending on your age group?
All that aside, the Kaiser article then puts the greed icing on the corruption cake:
Based on the above, we estimate total payments to hospitals for treating uninsured patients under the Trump administration policy would range from $13.9 billion to $41.8 billion. At the top end of the range, payments on behalf of the uninsured would consume more than 40% of the $100 billion fund Congress created to help hospitals and others respond to the COVID-19 epidemic. Given the uncertainty of our estimates of the total funding that will be needed to reimburse hospitals, and the fact that infections may come in several waves over the next year,2 it is unclear whether the new fund will be able to cover the costs of the uninsured in addition to other needs...
“Thanks for the extra 100 Billion dollars, but it’s probably not going to be enough.”
To which I say, “Good thing you get double that from the compulsory tax provided by the money laundering fund called Health Insurance, which you also own.”
It's been a year since that amazing and infamous day when "The Plan" seemed like it was falling apart (or at least the common understanding of it). We were supposed to be saved by the military, and all the evil bastards arrested, bringing in a new golden age.
That didn't happen. Instead we learned that We The People are The Plan. We are our saviors. We will bring in a new Golden Age. We have learned to be critical of everything, even our own beliefs. From this enlightened position we can build, and are building a... dare I say it...
A New World Order.
LOL
Whatever you want to call it. It falls to us to build it, and building it we are.
I see all the signs of a guiding hand, leading us towards both our own empowerment, but also a precipice. At this precipice we, an awakened We The People will become en masse fully cognizant of The Matrix that has guided our actions and beliefs, and restricted our potential for millennia (especially the past century). At this precipice point I believe we won't need guns or bombs or F15s or nukes to end the madness of the Age Of Demons. We will simply Stop Playing The Game.
The point of this post wasn't to make a grand statement of our future, but to comment on this year. For the past couple decades of my life, working in corporations, academia, etc. every year has felt like a week. On every important day I think to myself, "Has it been a year already???" The time in between the moments of that life I remember were as nothing. They were wasted moments spent doing meaningless things for evil people who were using me to create their Machine.
Now, I can't believe it's only been one year. It feels like I've lived those lost two decades in a year.
Time flies when you're having fun, or doing completely meaningless shit for all the wrong reasons. But apparently when you're trying to save the world time stands still.
I have lived more in the past year than in all the years before. I understand that my life is precious now, and they can't have another second of it. I will work towards bringing their evil to an end, not because of them, but because it is rewarding work (even though the pay is shite, but money is a farce anyways, so who gives a shit).
I am doing what I'm doing not for me. I'm already free. I am doing this because everyone deserves to understand that their life is precious, and that they can choose to throw off their chains of slavery.
Everyone deserves to have their years be full of life instead of a forgotten moment of "waiting to die."
A wrinkle in a shirt can be thought of as two parts. It can be thought of as two otherwise separate parts of cloth touching each other. But it's also a larger part sticking out, the "in between" those two touching parts. Similarly, A Wrinkle In Time is two parts. It is a decades long life that feels like a forgotten snippet (the beginning and the end of a time period touching each other, where you just skip over the middle). But it's also the in between; a day that lasts a year; a year that feels like a century, a moment that lasts forever.
I have spent a century of being truly free in this past year. No matter what comes next, ThanQ for showing me the value of my life.
This is part of my report on our education system. I am not providing evidence for it right now (it's long and in my report), but our entire education system (as well as all books, movies, research journals, and all other sources of media) come from a single source, and they have for over 100 years (multiple generations). I like to call that source The Trust, but you can call them the Rockefellers. It's not entirely accurate, but for now it's close enough.
I am making this post because people often don't understand what "trust" is. Nor do they understand what "critical thinking" is. The reason they don't understand these things is because they have been taught that they are something different than what they actually are. These confusions give the PTB control over our beliefs and our actions. They are fundamental control mechanisms for The Matrix. Here I will discuss these concepts a little bit.
This is part of a longer report, so forgive the flow, as it may relate to other content, and forgive some of the normie centric stuff. The report is intended for an audience that still thinks vaccines are God's gift to mankind.
What is critical thinking?
Looking up the definitions I am very unsatisfied with what I find. In addition to a lack of agreement, the definitions seem nebulous, even circular. You would think something so fundamental would not be that difficult to explain. Stanford’s philosophical encyclopedia says this about it:
Critical thinking is a widely accepted educational goal. Its definition is contested, but the competing definitions can be understood as differing conceptions of the same basic concept: careful thinking directed to a goal. Conceptions differ with respect to the scope of such thinking, the type of goal, the criteria and norms for thinking carefully, and the thinking components on which they focus.
So its an “educational goal” that has apparently completely failed since it can’t even be defined in a satisfactory manner. What else?
John Dewey (1910), who more commonly called it ‘reflective thinking’. He defined it as:
active, persistent and careful consideration of any belief or supposed form of knowledge in the light of the grounds that support it, and the further conclusions to which it tends.
Mmkay… I find when something seems difficult to define, its best to look at the roots. The etymological dictionary is quite nice for this, though we have to… think critically about what it says to piece it all together:
critical: critic + -al "involving judgment as to the truth or merit of something"
-al: relating to
critic: from Greek kritikos "able to make judgments," from krinein "to separate, decide" (from PIE root *krei-"to sieve," thus "discriminate, distinguish"
So to be critical means to judge the truth or merit of something. An important implied statement is that if you are being critical, it is you being critical, i.e. you are the “critic” in “critical thinking”. It is you applying judgment as to the truth or merit of something. It is you that is being discriminating (discerning). It is you that is deciding for yourself after consideration.
think: "imagine, conceive in the mind; consider, meditate, remember; intend, wish, desire"
To think means (according to this) to conceive in the mind. It’s perhaps a bit narrow of a definition, but for this purpose I think (conceive in my mind) that it will suffice. This suggests it is possible to “think” without being critical, but it is not possible to be critical without thinking. Thus, using the etymological dictionary, my conclusion is:
critical thinking: to be discerning and think for yourself, applying your own judgment, after consideration, as to the truth or merit of something.
(Emphasis because these ideas are so often skipped in our teaching.)
That wasn’t so hard. I like mine a lot better than any of the other “competing definitions” I’ve seen, though I had to use some critical thinking to get to it.
What would be the opposite of critical thinking? It could be “any thinking that is not applying your own judgment as to the truth or merit of something” (not being critical). It could also be “not thinking at all” (not thinking).
On an unrelated note (but totally not unrelated at all), what does it mean to trust?
trust: reliance on the veracity, integrity, or other virtues of someone or something
belief that someone or something is reliable, good, honest, effective
To “trust” means to rely on someone else (e.g. to make judgments, or decide what is truth) for us. To be “critical” means to rely on yourself to make judgments, or decide what is truth. To trust means to assign your critical thinking over to someone else. Trust, in this context, is the opposite of critical thinking since you are giving up the “you” part of the critic and giving it to someone (or something) else.
Why would we trust? Sometimes there just isn’t enough time to do a whole lot of critical thinking or to be skeptical. Imagine couples figure skating without trust. It isn’t that I think there is never an appropriate time for trust. What I mean to say is, most of the time we are trusting, we aren’t realizing we are doing so. We are instead doing what we were trained to do (trust) instead of critical thinking, which is what we should be doing.
For example; we are told:
- Listen to your mother (but we really mean trust).
- Listen to your teacher (but we really mean trust).
- Trust your doctor.
- Respect your elders (but we really mean trust).
- Trust the experts.
- Trust the science (which is the opposite of what scientists are taught about science).
- Trust what you see on the news, they can’t lie because you are being shown the truth.
Other than what we are told, we trust certain institutions as well. For example:
- We trust government institutions, even though almost no one trusts any politicians.
- We trust large corporate institutions even though they are basically conflict of interest machines.
- We trust books if they are old.
- We trust what someone says, if someone we trust also trusts them. Trust is like a virus, it spreads unabated within whatever echo chambers we belong.
- We trust leaders, because they are more important than us, and there must be a reason they are more important than us.
In other words, we give up our own critical thinking in all of these circumstances.
All our lives, from cradle to grave, this is what we are taught; to trust these sources. I do not mean to suggest we should not be listening to our mothers, or teachers, or doctors, or experts, etc. On the contrary, I think that listening is an excellent path to understanding Reality. What I am trying to say is, listening to someone's argument and then thinking critically on it, and trusting someone are not the same thing. In fact they are, at least sometimes, at odds.
We've likely all see the recent press release from the whitehouse about how all the vaccine free people are doomed this winter from Omicron (a Decepticon).
What's really interesting is that the day before Joe said it too.
They probably had to repeat the message by someone who could read as he kinda flubbed the seriousness of the Dark Winter message in his brain cell dying (and killing) manner of speech.
For unvaccinated, we are looking at a winter of severe illness and death — if you’re unvaccinated — for themselves, their families, and the hospitals they’ll soon overwhelm.
mmhmm. Ok Joe, one more time. This time use proper sentence structure.
Fifty-seven -– excuse me –- five hundred and seventy –- excuse me –- I don’t want to read -– I’m not sure I got the right number. The — the total number of boosters is what?
Thank you for clearing that up. I am properly afraid now.
Enjoy the show. Q
The articles of incorporation for the central bank companies (The BIS, The Fed, IMF, etc.) make the explicit statement that all agents are immune to all laws except their own, i.e. they state explicitly that they are the highest sovereign in the world. These are self-proclamations. No state or other entity gives the banks the authority they have. Just like the Natural Person signers of similar documents for the United States, the signers for the BIS's articles of incorporation, as sovereign entities themselves, create from out of the aether, the BIS corporation (AKA a legal entity, in this case, the legal sovereign of sovereigns).
The definition of a corporation is a "legal entity." A legal entity is distinct from a Natural Person (you, your neighbor, etc.). A legal entity (corporation) is a shield, created by an authority (a State, or even a group of sovereign people, such as with the United States government) that acts as a barrier in case of lawsuit. It protects those who created the entity (or otherwise run it and/or are shareholders) from incurring a social debt if the corporation gets in trouble. That doesn't mean a CEO can't get in trouble, but that requires a separate suit with evidence for specific illegal actions done by the Natural Person, not "the corporation" as a whole.
This corporation (The BIS) achieves legal sovereign of sovereign status because all the other sovereign government corporations (AKA legal entities) agree that they have it. They grant, by their own laws, that The BIS has all the rights stated within their articles of incorporation. This includes not only the rights of controlling the entire economy (and all the other levels of control implicit with that power), but also extends all legal exemptions from a countries own laws. "The King can do no wrong."
For example, from the BIS
Article 55
(1) The Bank shall enjoy immunity from jurisdiction, save:
(a) to the extent that such immunity is formally waived in individual cases by the Chairman of the Board, the General Manager, the Deputy General Manager, or their duly authorised representatives; or
(b) in civil or commercial suits, arising from banking or financial transactions, initiated by contractual counterparties of the Bank, except in those cases in which provision for arbitration has been or shall have been made.
(2) Property and assets of the Bank shall, wherever located and by whomsoever held, be immune from any measure of execution (including seizure, attachment, freeze or any other measure of execution, enforcement or sequestration), except if that measure of execution is sought pursuant to a final judgment rendered against the Bank by any court of competent jurisdiction pursuant to sub-paragraph 1(a) or (b) above.
(3) All deposits entrusted to the Bank, all claims against the Bank and the shares issued by the Bank shall, without the express prior agreement of the Bank, wherever located and by whomsoever held, be immune from any measure of execution (including seizure, attachment, freeze or any other measure of execution, enforcement or sequestration).
The only ones that are allowed to bring suits are those who have contracts with the BIS. Who are those? Other member banks. Anyone else? I don’t know, maybe. But the only suit they can bring is a bank related civil or commercial suit. No other suit. No other law binds their actions. None. Blow up the world? No one can sue them.
That's the law.
All countries (that I have looked at so far) have written into law that they agree; all agents of the BIS are immune to all laws, in every country, on the planet.
Example:
Article 3
Inviolability
1. The buildings or parts of buildings and surrounding land
which, whoever may be the owner thereof, are used for the
purposes of the Bank shall be inviolable. No agent of the Swiss
public authorities may enter therein without the express consent of the Bank. Only the President,3 the General Manager of the
Bank, or their duly authorised representative shall be competent
to waive such inviolability.
2. The archives of the Bank and, in general, all documents
and any data media belonging to the Bank or in its possession,
shall be inviolable at all times and in all places.
3. The Bank shall exercise supervision of and police power
over its premises
Article 4
Immunity from jurisdiction and execution
1. The Bank shall enjoy immunity from jurisdiction, save:
(a) to the extent that such immunity is formally waived in
individual cases by the President,3 the General Manager
of the Bank, or their duly authorised representatives;
(b) in civil or commercial suits, arising from banking or
financial transactions, initiated by contractual
counterparties of the Bank, except in those cases in
which provision for arbitration has been or shall have
been made;
(c) in the case of any civil action against the Bank for
damage caused by any vehicle belonging to or operated
on behalf of the Bank.
...
3. The Bank shall enjoy, in respect of its property and
assets, wherever located and by whomsoever held, immunity
from any measure of execution (including seizure, attachment,
freeze or any other measure of execution, enforcement or
sequestration, and in particular of attachment within the
meaning of Swiss law), except:
(a) in cases where execution is claimed on the basis of a final
judgment rendered by a court which has jurisdiction over
the Bank in accordance with paragraph 1(a), (b) or (c)
above;
...
The only court with "jurisdiction" over the Bank is the Bank itself, or someone else that they allow to have jurisdiction.
Other examples:
With amendments
With explicit statements of immunity for all international banks.
Here's a statement that a bunch of countries are assigning greater sovereignty to the BIS.
The BIS (and all central banks as their agents) are our sovereign by law.
Of course the fact that such a decree is unlawful according to Natural Law (and Constitutional Law) is not relevant to the PTB, nor is it relevant to us.
Until we make it relevant.
On June 04, 1963, JFK signed EO 11110. Five months later, on Nov. 22, 1963 he was assassinated.
The Constitution Article 1, Section 8 clause five, speaking on the exclusive powers of congress says:
To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures;
The coinage act of 1792 says:
SEC. 9. And be it further enacted, That there shall be from time to time struck and coined at the said mint, coins of gold, silver, and copper, of the following denominations, values and descriptions, ... Dollars or the same is now current, and to contain three hundred and seventy-one grains and four sixteenth parts of a grain of pure, or four hundred and sixteen grains of standard silver
The U.S. dollar was defined to be 371.25 grains of silver.
Is the U.S. dollar still defined that way? I'm not sure. Its a little confusing.
in 1900 the Gold Standard Act defined gold as 23.22 grains of gold, taking us off a bimetal standard (which can never work because of conflicting supply/demand curves).
In 2019 bill H.R. 2558 attempts to reintroduce a Gold Standard (it has not been voted on). It says:
To define the dollar as a fixed weight of gold.
This is confusing because I think the dollar is still defined as gold (or maybe silver or maybe both). Would that make this bill automatically fail? I'm not sure. It could redefine its value, but it doesn't say that. I think the problem with this bill is, it misses the fact that we haven't used a U.S. dollar as legal tender in circulation for a very long time. We have instead used Federal Reserve notes (FRN). The U.S. Dollar has never been redefined as an FRN but remains either gold, silver, or both.
Legal Tender is defined by the Coinage Act of 1965 Section 31 U.S.C. 5103 as:
"United States coins and currency (including Federal reserve notes and circulating notes of Federal reserve banks and national banks) are legal tender for all debts, public charges, taxes, and dues."
It goes on to say:
This statute means that all United States money as identified above are a valid and legal offer of payment for debts when tendered to a creditor. There is, however, no Federal statute mandating that a private business, a person or an organization must accept currency or coins as for payment for goods and/or services. Private businesses are free to develop their own policies on whether or not to accept cash unless there is a State law which says otherwise.
This means that no one has to accept the debt IOUs we mistakenly call the U.S. Dollar (when what we really mean is FRN) as payment. BUT, you can use it for debts, public charges, taxes, and dues and it must be accepted as legal tender (tender meaning "an offer", legal meaning "by declaration of law").
I am not sure how the FRN bypasses Article 1 Section 8 Clause 5. It may be that FRNs are not "money" by definition, but legal tender. It may be that because the money is technically printed by the US Department of the Treasury its still "under control" of the Congress. Whatever the loophole is, FRN's are not necessarily lawful tender (as defined by the constitution) but are legal tender (as defined by subsequent laws on the books that may not be constitutional).
So FRN's aren't mandatory for the four things listed above, but since there is no other real option (unless you want to bring in all the pennies you have saved up in your lifetime) you pretty much have to use FRN's for several of the things we are most used to paying, notably loan debt and taxes, both of which are strictly banking endeavors (taxes go to the Fed, not the Treasury).
Of course if there were a legitimate option besides FRNs to pay taxes and debts (bank loans), this would bypass the Federal Reserves economic monopoly. Anything but an FRN would be really bad for the Fed if used widespread as they would lose their legal monopoly and thus would lose all their power unless they could compete with the new currency (which would really fuck them up).
Enter JFK and EO 11110.
EO 11110 modified EO 10289 (Truman 1951) which said (in Paragraph 1)
- The Secretary of the Treasury is hereby designated and empowered to perform the following-described functions of the President without the approval, ratification, or other action of the President:
This power of the SoT was added to by EO 11110 as follows.
(a) By adding at the end of paragraph 1 thereof the following subparagraph (j): "(j) The authority vested in the President by paragraph (b) of section 43 of the Act of May 12, 1933, as amended (31 U.S.C. 821 (b)), to issue silver certificates against any silver bullion, silver, or standard silver dollars in the Treasury not then held for redemption of any outstanding silver certificates, to prescribe the denominations of such silver certificates, and to coin standard silver dollars and subsidiary silver currency for their redemption,"
So the SoT was given power to issue silver certificates (print money) separate from the power of the President (and more importantly, from the power of the Fed). And fractional reserve lending by the Treasury was also not allowed:
to issue silver certificates against any silver bullion, silver, or standard silver dollars in the Treasury not then held for redemption of any outstanding silver certificates
Fractional Reserve Banking was not allowed because it is literally the root of all of the worlds current evils.
From EO 10289 Paragraph 2 reads:
- The Secretary of the Treasury is hereby designated and empowered to perform without the approval, ratification, or other action of the President the following functions which have heretofore, under the respective provisions of law cited, required the approval of the President in connection with their performance by the Secretary of the Treasury:
So the SoT had the following powers:
(b) The authority vested in the Secretary of the Treasury by section 9 of the act of June 19, 1934, c. 674, 48 Stat. 1181 (31 U.S.C. 448a), to issue rules and regulations necessary or proper to carry out the purposes of the said act or of any order issued thereunder.
(c) The authority vested in the Secretary of the Treasury by section 1805 of the Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.D. 1805) to issue rules and regulations (with respect to silver bullion) necessary or proper to carry out the purposes of the said section.
EO 11110 revoked these powers:
(b) By revoking subparagraphs (b) and (c) of paragraph 2 thereof.
This took away the ability of the SoT to overwrite the Presidents EO to give the power to print money to the SoT.
The 1951 Truman EO basically gave all rights to the SoT to do whatever the fuck they wanted without any oversight. Which was great, because the SoT's primary job was as a globalist, being the U.S. Governor of the IMF, which is to say, they were working for the Fed.
This is why almost every SoT has been a banker.
The JFK EO gave the power back to the Treasury to print real money, and took away from the Treasury the power to not have that power.
It basically opened the door to destroy the Fed. JFK was killed not long after, and that door was quickly closed.
The C_A may have pulled the trigger, but the Fed killed JFK. Not that I think many here are surprised by that, but I thought it should be made clear where that idea stems from.