No it isn't. The only one ceding ground is the one letting degenerates steal our language and twist it up. Giving up words at the first sign of danger is the epitome of ceding ground.
He did say less, not never.
Gender is a synonym for sex.
There is no basis to trust history you didn't witness. You think multiple sources can't collude to lie. Or that those sources are basing their claims on the truth, and not something that itself is incorrect. False history doesn't have to be some obvious lie that doesn't line up with other claims. All claims could be wrong, or there could only be false history. Even if one side thinks they're telling the truth, they might simply be reciting false information that they think is accurate.
Just because someone is trying to warp the narrative, doesn't mean the narrative they're trying to warp is correct, true, or not already warped.
You think you know history. How? Were you there? Or did someone have to write it down for you to read? Who wrote it down?
The reality is that we have no basis to trust history we weren't alive to see. It could all be made up, and everything past 100 years or so completely fabricated.
So basically, your position is Hitler good guy and that means Q can't be military intelligence. YOU can't be wrong, it must be that Q is fake.
In the end, you have to establish whether the proofs are sufficient, not whether you agree with what Q says or not. If Q is military intelligence and the proofs show this, they know more than us.
And the answers aren't really up for interpretation. It's a method of questioning that leaves the answers obvious or confirmed via the next question. The hardest stuff to "interpret" from Q aren't the questions, it's the statements and claims that simply haven't happened yet or aren't yet deciphered in terms of meaning. The questions are easy for the most part.
And that's the point. They know it's not Nazism. They are projecting. They are Nazis, so they call everyone else Nazis. Just like they project in every other way. Racist, sexist, tyrant. Every label they use seems to be a projection.
And I'm sure they would import a bunch of Nazi scientists and officials with operation paperclip if they weren't buddy buddy with them...
Who told you what Hitler stood for? Who wrote the history books? Who won the war?
The second one is Q replying to the person asking the question with no response other than the link to their comment. The implication being that the answer is yes and that it needs no further explanation.
The first one reads:
"Was Hitler a puppet?
Who was his handler?"
This is Q's style. The following question answers the preceding. Only a puppet has a handler. This isn't a question, nor is it even an implication, it's just the standard way Q presents information.
Also this: https://qalerts.app/?n=1941
What does that have to do with the fact the advertisers would run if everyone was unbanned from Twitter due to the fact they love their ideology more than money?
Execute them, exile them, or do nothing to them. Not other option exists that is just. Deprivation of rights is tyranny and if we did that we wouldn't need to worry about fighting the same battle with them as we'd have already lost to ourselves and become just like them.
Surely their only healthcare being goobermint healthcare would incentivize them to expand goobermint healthcare? Seems shortsighted.
Property tax is easily worse than income. Can't save up for a property and quit your job to live off your land if you have the constant need of paying the gubermint. In terms of being a slave to the system, it's way up there.
That being said, fuck both equally.
Advertisers get triggered and run away from money whenever the size of the advertising pool increases, if the increase is in "evil racist Nazi terrorists".
Trump is not god emperor of anything, and no one wants him to be. To take the term literally is asinine.
Flipping the table has 0 benefit in a game of chess. There is no loser until checkmate. Even if checkmate is a forgone conclusion, there's still the tiniest chance that the player in the winning position makes a colossal fuckup and you can win. And even if they don't fuck up, you can still try to force a draw depending on the situation. So the only thing that anyone who wants to win (and in this case winning means surviving) would do is play the best move every turn no matter what the outcome looks to be.
I haven't even been to a church since before I can remember. I do listen to what others say on certain interpretations in the attempt to find what makes the most sense. My view is that the Bible is mostly literal, so the interpretations can't be too separated from what the words say and mean.
So we should become just as bad as our enemies? The solution to tyranny is tyranny?
They're also taken away from everyday people. Doesn't make it just.
Pigs are chickens
New conspiracy unlocked KEK!
Does looking "beyond what you were told to believe by others" include the Bible?
That was my assumption, forgive me if that is not what you meant.
You know, fair enough. I suppose I'm a little sensitive to responses that come across as outright dismissals after so much time hearing MSM and NPCs call everyone who disagrees with them crazy lunatics.
Someone who thinks 2+2=5 is off the deep end, even if they don't claim it with certainty. And I agree with your point about disclaimers and moderate language, as well as that people who say things that aren't proven are "obviously so" aren't being open-minded.
Forgive my initial response to your comments, looking at them more I don't really disagree with much.
Woke exists because of Satan and people turning away from God.
Otherwise, I agree.