0
TheLighthouseBlues 0 points ago +1 / -1

I can understand why you would think that. Personally, I feel like the narrator sounds much younger.

I'm also starting to pack away any faith I had in this channel. It's too easy to change the titles and descriptions of videos and I can't verify that they were Q related at the time they were posted.

2
TheLighthouseBlues 2 points ago +3 / -1

This is why we're a community.

Thank you for talking this out with me. I definitely agree. I won't put stock in this channel since I can't verify what things looked like in 2017.

Man. I got so excited haha

1
TheLighthouseBlues 1 point ago +2 / -1

I agree with you and User6395 that this is a very likely possibility, but I find it very interesting that the channel's first video is from October of the month that Q began, along with a video being posted on October 17.

But maybe they used to have more videos and they deleted their backlog to look more convincing and fit the Q narrative.

Do we know if there are any ways to mine metadata or look through archives to see what these video titles and descriptions were back when they were posted?

1
TheLighthouseBlues 1 point ago +2 / -1

Go right ahead, friend. I've already watched several of them. You should, too.

Who knows? You might be right.

2
TheLighthouseBlues 2 points ago +3 / -1

Right, and I hear that, but wasn't Q's first post October 28, 17?

The first video on this channel is from October 9, 2017. It's called Q Riots = Soros Obama.

Its description? Look below...

Deep State Riots

  1. Instill fear
  2. Lock people in their houses
  3. Drive tens of millions out of work
  4. Remove the pressure valves: Sports, Concerts, Bars, Theaters, Lunch with Friends...
  5. Close the churches
  6. Dehumanize through masking the healthy
  7. Wait
  8. Strike match...

Don't allow their dark energy to negatively influence you.

Soros (tick tock)...

Stay on course...

(End of Description)

Their second video is titled "Q P(l)andemic." Their third video, called "Q Deep State Virus," was posted on October 17, 2017.

So, "no outside comms," but then how do we explain this? How could these videos be about Q stuff before Q started posting if it wasn't Q?**

1
TheLighthouseBlues 1 point ago +2 / -1

This is an incredible analysis and explanation, way more of one than I thought I would get. Thank you for taking the time!

I have two follow-up questions, if you don't mind:

Has Q made any mention of Hunger Games before? I definitely see the similar theme with the clocks, but surely there are lots of movies and stories that use clock imagery. I've seen people on here mention that scene before, but I'm not sure what led to this movie being a focus of analysis. Maybe I would understand more if I read the book, like you said. I know you shared those videos of the lightning, but I would be really convinced if Q posted something related to lightning on the 12 o'clock hour.

And if this theory about that scene from the series is correct, what does that mean exactly? Does it mean that tomorrow's drops will be at 1am and 1pm? Are we counting down to 10/10 for the "big [red] wave"?

2
TheLighthouseBlues 2 points ago +3 / -1

No, definitely not. I'm fairly positive that that is him.

https://youtu.be/aCjb1jNoBIU

2
TheLighthouseBlues 2 points ago +3 / -1

A beautiful way to put it. And of course I care immensely about the children. I follow those happenings and they're what sparked my journey into being redpilled to begin with.

But when I see stuff like this, it makes it hard not to believe that he's out there: https://youtu.be/aCjb1jNoBIU

2
TheLighthouseBlues 2 points ago +4 / -2

Yeah, but I mean realistically what would anyone actually expect him to say: "yes"? No way haha, not before it's time.

0
TheLighthouseBlues 0 points ago +2 / -2

I want to believe this so badly. Seeing Vincent Fusca at Trump's rallies is the closest thing that's convinced me this is all real. This photo looks legitimate, too, but I don't really trust Pryme Minister. I want to, but many of his claims are way, way too out there with zero evidence backing them up.

Earlier in the summer he was posting "Tweets from Robert Trump" on his deathbed about Bohemian Grove and Q being real. The account was unverified and deleted. He also says that all these corrupt celebrities and politicians are already dead, despite us seeing them on TV. I know there are theories around this, but it's too hard to believe some of the more out there claims, which makes me hesitant to believe this if he's the one purporting it.

I'll mark October 17 on my calendar and I pray that this is real, but I don't want to get my hopes up.

4
TheLighthouseBlues 4 points ago +5 / -1

These are greattttttt videos to watch. Definitely attaching my vote to these as well!

3
TheLighthouseBlues 3 points ago +4 / -1

I'm at work and I don't have time to go looking for a specific episode, but The Amazing Polly on YouTube is really phenomenal. She's an incredible investigator, she does seriously impressive deep dives, she's super easy and relaxing to listen to, she's funny and serious, and most importantly she's very genuine and real.

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJkOZZrGNEJYDhzVwd24Bfg

1
TheLighthouseBlues 1 point ago +2 / -1

Sure, but I suppose I'm meaning more-so once the deep state has been weeded out, if that reality is possible and in our future. @Gotrek was saying that Q said we would "never" find out the depth of it.

So, I was wondering if "never" really meant never, or if the truth will come out once we have control and can prosecute all involved.

3
TheLighthouseBlues 3 points ago +4 / -1

Never? Do we not think that that information is going to be part of the Great Awakening?

6
TheLighthouseBlues 6 points ago +7 / -1

This is good thinking, but I don't believe it's correct. We were told last week that information regarding the Durham report would be dropping over the next 13 days.

The dates in that Q post (Sep 14-18, 21-25) are the two work weeks within those 13 days. I believe Q is just telling us to pay attention to these business days for more information regarding Durham. Track and follow events.

4
TheLighthouseBlues 4 points ago +5 / -1

I definitely agree with this assessment, but I believe the 9 and 11 simply refer to 9/11, 2001. You could be right about those being the dates where the process started, but I think that might be reaching a little too much, when the connection to 9/11 is pretty obvious. Plus the fact that the text stacked on top of each other looks like towers.

But yes, this is great analyzing!

2
TheLighthouseBlues 2 points ago +4 / -2

Can you share more evidence that you think Gowdy is one of them? I'd love to learn.

1
TheLighthouseBlues 1 point ago +2 / -1

I find it weird that that Q drop mentions Godfather III, when news literally just dropped that a new Director's cut of Godfather III is soon to be released in theaters.

I can't imagine this actually means anything, I just thought it was weird.

8
TheLighthouseBlues 8 points ago +9 / -1

"Hillary Clinton is an amazing person who has done so much."

That's really all he had to say to confirm that he's lost his way and/or has been compromised. Poor guy. It sounds like he's bounced around a lot in his head throughout his life.

I can't wait to see what "proof" he posts on his website.

7
TheLighthouseBlues 7 points ago +8 / -1

Can we please group up and show this woman some love? She's a confused puppet of the media. She doesn't understand what her daughter is doing

Maybe if we show her that Q is full of love, warmth, and hope it will encourage her to dig deeper and maybe we can save this family.

2
TheLighthouseBlues 2 points ago +3 / -1

I think he's just being silly and making a point at the same time :)

People tend to be very ominous around here. Haha! I guess it's to be expected given the nature of the information we're dealing with.

But really, Q is basically exposing everything. All the bad things in our country, in our world, they really do seem to stem from the same source. And that's going to be a really hard pill for people to swallow.

Our world is a terrible, awful place full of bad people getting away with doing lots of bad things. We all know this to an extent, every single one of us, yet it's very easy for us to also shrug off "conspiracy theories."

I like to think about it this way... (but please don't think I'm directing this at you, just writing down more thoughts because communication and the sharing of ideas is so important)

All of this corruption, evil, wrongdoing that we all know exists - which of these two options is, in your mind, a happier explanation for why it all exists in our societies?

  1. Because people are naturally capable of doing good and evil things. There are a lot of people who decide to do those evil things and find ways to get away with it. They act independently and the world we've built for ourselves rewards bad people.

  2. There is one organization that controls, owns, and leads all of it, creating ways for people to operate undetected to further the agenda of those at the very top of the pyramid.

Doesn't it give you more hope to think that all of the chaos, evil, and madness in our world stems from one organization that is about to be ripped up from the earth, root and stem?

Of course there will always be bad people, always be evil, always be criminals. But without the puppet masters creating their ideal world and using us as pawns, the vast majority of all this cruelty in the world is going to drop off and leave room for us as humans to rebuild into a better, more "good" image of the world we want to live in.

1
TheLighthouseBlues 1 point ago +2 / -1

I've always felt this way about Alex, too, which is why I mentioned earlier that this has all been messing with my head - because a lot of what he's said is looking to be very true.

But you're absolutely right, he's very roundabout and he doesn't make it easy to listen to him. I almost never watch him, but let me tell you... watching him every once in a while can be absolute gold for entertainment value. You just have to enjoy the absurdity of who he is, and his dark self-righteous humor, which can be understandably hard to do.

And thankfully, there are lots of places to get information other than Alex Jones. Haha.

2
TheLighthouseBlues 2 points ago +3 / -1

I couldn't agree more about this strategy. They honestly make it way too obvious to figure out what's legit and what's not. They don't realize that if they didn't react, we would gain no further insight into the validity of any information being given to us.

Polly has a beautiful reaction to this video that I felt was incredibly inspiring. If you have the time, I recommend that you (and everyone else) give it a watch.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PI3kdaMQfPc

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›